Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Integrate gives wrong results


Integrate[a/(Sin[t]^2 + a^2), {t, 0, 2 Pi}]


$$\int_0^{2 \pi } \frac{a}{a^2+\sin ^2(t)} \, dt$$


gives $0$


This cannot be true. What is going on?


If I insert a number into a, it gives a reasonable result:


NIntegrate[2/(Sin[t]^2 + 4), {t, 0, 2 Pi}]

give 2.80993



Answer



$Version


(*
Out[228]= "8.0 for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (October 7, 2011)"
*)

The result provided by Mathematica is correct:


Integrate[a/(a^2 + Sin[t]^2), {t, 0, 2 π}]

(*
Out[213]= (2 π)/(Sqrt[1 + 1/a^2] a)

*)

Now the same procedure as "always" which "explains" the zero result. The indefinite integral is


Integrate[a/(a^2 + Sin[t]^2), t]

(*
Out[214]= ArcTan[(Sqrt[1 + a^2] Tan[t])/a]/Sqrt[1 + a^2]
*)

This result is not continuous for real a. In this graph we can see the jumps as well as the necessary additional terms to restore continuity.



The jump must be determined by taking (directed) limits. Assuming first $a>0$ gives


Simplify[Limit[ArcTan[(Sqrt[1 + a^2] Tan[t])/a]/Sqrt[1 + a^2], 
t -> π/2, Direction -> +1], a > 0] -
Simplify[Limit[ArcTan[(Sqrt[1 + a^2] Tan[t])/a]/Sqrt[1 + a^2],
t -> π/2, Direction -> -1], a > 0]

(*
Out[408]= π/Sqrt[1 + a^2]
*)


and therefore


With[{a = 1/2}, 
Plot[{ArcTan[(Sqrt[1 + a^2] Tan[t])/a]/Sqrt[1 + a^2],
ArcTan[(Sqrt[1 + a^2] Tan[t])/a]/Sqrt[1 + a^2] + π/Sqrt[1 + a^2],
ArcTan[(Sqrt[1 + a^2] Tan[t])/a]/Sqrt[1 + a^2] + (2 π)/Sqrt[
1 + a^2]}, {t, 0, 2 π}]]

150601_plot_int.jpg


The blue (lower) curve is the original antiderivative, the red (middle) curve has π/Sqrt[1+a^2] added, and is the continiuous continuation between π/2 and 3π/2, finally the brown (upper) curve does it for the rest adding again the same amount π/Sqrt[1+a^2].


Hence taking the difference of the antiderivative at the endpoints according to the fundamental theorem of calculus would lead to zero on the blue curve, and is only correct for the continuous version leading to the correct result given in the beginning.



EDIT #1


The case $a<0$ need not be discussed separately because of the (anti)symmetry of the integral.


Note that because the antiderivative vanishes at both ends the integral is equal to the "total" jump, which here is twice the amount of the jump at $\pi/2$.


This and other examples point to the (tentative) rule: if the result of Integrate[] is zero despite the fact that the integrand is positive check for jumps and calculate them using the directed Limits. The integral will then be the sum of the jumps over the whole interval.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....