Skip to main content

How to deal with the condition $u_i=u_{i+1}$ in B-Spline basis function?


The defintion of B-Spline basis function as shown below:


Let $\vec{U}=\{u_0,u_1,\ldots,u_m\}$ a nondecreasing sequence of real numbers,i.e, $u_i\leq u_{i+1}\quad i=0,1,2\ldots m-1$


$$N_{i,0}(u)= \begin{cases} 1 & u_i\leq u

Although I know that Mathematica owns a built-in function BSplineBasis, however, I would like to write my auxiliay function $N_{i,p}(u)$ to learn the NURBS theory and Mathematica programming.


NBSpline


Alogrithm:




enter image description here



 (*=======================Caculate N[i,0](u)================================*)
NBSpline[i_Integer, 0, u_Symbol, U : {Sequence[_] ..}] /;
i <= Length[U] - 2 :=
Piecewise[
{{1, U[[i + 1]] <= u < U[[i + 2]]},
{0, u < U[[i + 1]] || u >= U[[i + 2]]}}]


(*=======================Caculate N[i,p](u)================================*)

NBSpline[i_Integer, p_Integer, u_Symbol, U : {Sequence[_] ..}?OrderedQ] /;
p > 0 && i + p <= Length[U] - 2 :=
Module[{ini},
ini = Table[NBSpline[j, 0, u, U], {j, i, i + p}];
First@Simplify@
Nest[
Dot @@@
(Thread@

{Partition[#, 2, 1],
With[{m = i + p - Length@# + 1},
Table[
{(u - U[[k + 1]])/(U[[k + m + 1]] - U[[k + 1]]),
(U[[k + m + 2]] - u)/(U[[k + m + 2]] - U[[k + 2]])}, {k, i, i + Length@# - 2}]]}) &,
ini, p]
]

Test


NBSpline[1, 3, u, {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7}] // TraditionalForm



enter image description here



In my function NBSpline I avoid the condition $u_i=u_{i+1}$, because it will occured the case $\frac{0}{0}$


In the book "The NURBS book", it defines this quotient $\frac{0}{0}$ to be zero.


Question


How to deal with the condition $\frac{0}{0}$ that I sometimes need to set it to 0 ? Namely, How to deal with the condition $u_i=u_{i+1}$ in B-Spline basis function?



Answer



Here is one way to deal with repeated entries in U. One can define a function to compute the coefficient, using one rule when $u_i = u_j$ and the general formula otherwise. One might put extra conditions on the patterns in coeff below, but if the function is called only within NBSpline, then one might assume the conditions are met.



ClearAll[coeff];
coeff[u_, i_, j_, U_] /; U[[i]] == U[[j]] := 0;
coeff[u_, i_, j_, U_] := (u - U[[i]])/(U[[j]] - U[[i]])

Then change the definition of NBSpline for p != 0 as follows.


NBSpline[i_Integer, p_Integer, u_Symbol, 
U : {Sequence[_] ..}?OrderedQ] /; p > 0 && i + p <= Length[U] - 2 :=
Module[{ini}, ini = Table[NBSpline[j, 0, u, U], {j, i, i + p}];
First@Simplify@
Nest[Dot @@@ (Thread@{Partition[#, 2, 1],

With[{m = i + p - Length@# + 1},
Table[{
coeff[u, k + 1, k + m + 1, U],
coeff[u, k + m + 2, k + 2, U]},
{k, i, i + Length@# - 2}]]}) &, ini, p]]

Example:


NBSpline[1, 3, u, {1, 2, 2, 4, 5, 7}]

Mathematica graphics



The output of NBSpline[1, 3, u, {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7}] agrees with the output in the question.


P.S. The pattern U : {Sequence[_] ..}?OrderedQ is equivalent to U_List?OrderedQ. You might want a check that restricts U to be a list of numbers, since an ordered list of symbols such as {a, b, c} passes the OrderedQ test. The pattern U_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] && OrderedQ[#] &) is one way.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...