Skip to main content

parallelization - Are built-in Mathematica functions already parallelized?


I've been noticing something strange since updating to Mathematica 8, and that is that occaisionally I'll see that the MathKernel is using up to 800% CPU in my Activity Monitor on OS X (I have 8 cores). I have no Parallel calls whatsoever, and this is in a single kernel, not across multiple kernels. My code is pretty much only Interpolates, Maps, Do loops, and plotting routines.



I'm curious if some of the built-in Mathematica routines are in fact already parallel, and if so, which ones?



Answer



Natively multi-threaded functions


A lot of functions are internally multi-threaded (image processing, numerical functions, etc.). For instance:


In[1]:= a = Image[RandomInteger[{0, 255}, {10000, 10000}], "Byte"];

In[2]:= SystemOptions["ParallelOptions"]

Out[2]= {"ParallelOptions" -> {"AbortPause" -> 2., "BusyWait" -> 0.01,
    "MathLinkTimeout" -> 15., "ParallelThreadNumber" -> 4, 

   "RecoveryMode" -> "ReQueue", "RelaunchFailedKernels" -> False}}

In[3]:= ImageResize[a, {3723, 3231}, 
   Resampling -> "Lanczos"]; // AbsoluteTiming

Out[3]= {1.2428834, Null}

In[4]:= SetSystemOptions[
 "ParallelOptions" -> {"ParallelThreadNumber" -> 1}]


Out[4]= "ParallelOptions" -> {"AbortPause" -> 2., "BusyWait" -> 0.01, 
  "MathLinkTimeout" -> 15., "ParallelThreadNumber" -> 1, 
  "RecoveryMode" -> "ReQueue", "RelaunchFailedKernels" -> False}

In[5]:= ImageResize[a, {3723, 3231}, 
   Resampling -> "Lanczos"]; // AbsoluteTiming

Out[5]= {2.7461943, Null}

Functions calling optimized libraries



Mathematica surely gets benefit from multi-threaded libraries (such as MKL) too:


In[1]:= a = RandomReal[{1, 2}, {5000, 5000}];

In[2]:= b = RandomReal[1, {5000}];

In[3]:= SystemOptions["MKLThreads"]

Out[3]= {"MKLThreads" -> 4}

In[4]:= LinearSolve[a, b]; // AbsoluteTiming


Out[4]= {4.9585104, Null}

In[5]:= SetSystemOptions["MKLThreads" -> 1]

Out[5]= "MKLThreads" -> 1

In[6]:= LinearSolve[a, b]; // AbsoluteTiming

Out[6]= {8.5545926, Null}


Although, the same function may not get multi-threaded depending on the type of input.


Compiled function


CompiledFunctions and any other functions that automatically use Compile can be multi-threaded too, using Parallelization option to Compile.


Caution




  1. Measuring timing with AbsoluteTiming for multi-threaded functions could be inaccurate sometimes.





  2. The performance gain is usually not direct proportion to the number of threads. It depends on a lot of different factors.




  3. Increasing number of threads (by using SetSystemOptions ) more than what your CPU support (either physical or logical cores) is not a good idea.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....
Post a Comment
Read more