Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Bad performance of Integrate (and WolframAlpha) for an Integral of Bessel function of the first kind: Version 11 edit


Version 11 Edit


The issue still remains:


Integrate[BesselJ[0, x], {x, 0, ∞}] // Timing
(* {29.8125, 1} *)

$Version


(* "11.3.0 for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (March 7, 2018)" *)


Original post


The following returns unevaluated in WolframAlpha. Also in my machine Mathematica needs quite a lot of time to compute it.


In[720]:= Integrate[BesselJ[0, x], {x, 0, \[Infinity]}] // Timing
Out[720]= {26.520170, 1}

I am puzzled because I thought such integrals are well tabulated in Mathematica.


At least the numerical integration is performed very quickly.


In[721]:= NIntegrate[BesselJ[0, x], {x, 0, \[Infinity]}] // Timing
Out[721]= {0.826805, 1.}


Any ideas about this performance of Mathematica and WolframAlpha?


EDIT


As J. M. is back suggested the following gives the result almost immediately


In[734]:= LaplaceTransform[BesselJ[0, t], t, s] /. s -> 0 // Timing
Out[734]= {0., 1}

For me the poor behavior of Integrate here still remains. What is even worse are the differences between the result of Mathematica and WolframAlpha.


In[761]:= LaplaceTransform[BesselJ[0, t], t, s]
Out[761]= 1/Sqrt[1 + s^2]


whereas WolframAlpha returns


1/(sqrt(1+1/s^2) s)

So you have to type


Limit[1/(sqrt(1+1/s^2) s),s->0]

in order to get finally 1.


EDIT 2


In[2]:= Quit[]


In[1]:= Integrate[BesselJ[0, x], {x, 0, \[Infinity]},
GenerateConditions -> False] // Timing
Out[1]= {26.301769, 1}

In[2]:= Quit[]

In[1]:= Integrate[BesselJ[n, x], {x, 0, \[Infinity]},
GenerateConditions -> False] // Timing
Out[1]= {0.109201, 1}


In[2]:= Quit[]

In[1]:= Integrate[BesselJ[n, x], {x, 0, \[Infinity]},
GenerateConditions -> True] // Timing
Out[1]= {8.049652, ConditionalExpression[1, Re[n] > -1]}

Compare the times 8.049652 (with n and GenerateConditions->True !) and 26.301769 (with n=0).


Rather funny:-)!


EDIT 3 Even more weird...



In[2]:= Quit[]

In[1]:= Integrate[BesselJ[n, x], {x, 0, \[Infinity]},
Assumptions -> n > 0] // Timing
Out[1]= {22.417344, 1}

Compare the times of Assumptions and GenerateConditions->True.


EDIT 4


Apparently something goes very wrong. With a clear kernel I got


Table[Timing[Integrate[BesselJ[0, x], {x, 0, Infinity}]], {i, 1, 10}]

Table[Timing[Integrate[BesselJ[1, x], {x, 0, Infinity}]], {i, 1, 10}]
Table[Timing[Integrate[BesselJ[2, x], {x, 0, Infinity}]], {i, 1, 10}]
Table[Timing[Integrate[BesselJ[3, x], {x, 0, Infinity}]], {i, 1, 10}]

Results


For m >= 4 Mathematica gives the 1 for m odd (same behavior as for m=3). For m even also gives 1 in all cases but needs more than 20 sec per average to evaluate the integral.


I cannot find a reason to explain this behavior which other more experienced users have called it buggy. I think Mathematica makes use of this reference. So apparently something is treated differently for n even.


EDIT 5 I_Mariusz pointed out a workaround. I added here in order to show its performance (if any) in Timing (and since on one hand our comments had misprints and on the other I did not know that Integrate can be compiled).


With a clear kernel I got:


int = Compile[{{x, _Real}}, 

Integrate[BesselJ[0, x], {x, 0, Infinity},
GenerateConditions -> False]];

Table[int[x] // Quiet // Timing, {10}]


{{26.254968, 1}, {24.897760, 1}, {24.897760, 1}, {20.046128, 1}, {0.046800, 1}, {0.046800, 1}, {0.062400, 1}, {0.062400, 1}, {0.062400, 1}, {0.062400, 1}}



At least now we get 1's in the whole loop!



Answer




I think this is not a answer but can serve as a summary of the useful workarounds. Still we do not have a rigorous explanation of the buggy (?) behavior.


Since


Integrate[BesselJ[0, x], {x, 0, \[Infinity]}] // Timing
(*{27.112974, 1}*)

J. M. is back suggested the following which gives the result almost immediately.


LaplaceTransform[BesselJ[0, t], t, s] /. s -> 0 // Timing
(*{0., 1}*)

In WolframAlpha we will get 1/(sqrt(1+1/s^2) s) from the LaplaceTransform so we need in addition Limit[1/(sqrt(1+1/s^2) s),s->0].



Integration with generic n gives the correct result but still the time is very large.


Integrate[BesselJ[n, x], {x, 0, \[Infinity]}] // Timing
(*{11.731275, ConditionalExpression[1, Re[n] > -1]}*)

Integrate[BesselJ[n, x], {x, 0, \[Infinity]},
Assumptions -> n \[Element] Reals] // Timing
(*{29.780591, ConditionalExpression[1, n > -1]}*)

As a workaround we can ignore the conditions


ClearSystemCache[]

Integrate[BesselJ[n, x], {x, 0, \[Infinity]},
GenerateConditions -> False] // Timing
(*{0.093601, 1}*)

or more rigorous (after B. Hanlon)


 Simplify[Integrate[BesselJ[n, x], {x, 0, \[Infinity]}, GenerateConditions -> True], n > -1] // Timing
(*{11.778075, 1}*)

Another interesting workaround is by I_Mariusz


int = Compile[{{x, _Real}}, 

Integrate[BesselJ[0, x], {x, 0, Infinity},
GenerateConditions -> False]];

Table[int[x] // Quiet // Timing, {10}]


{{26.254968, 1}, {24.897760, 1}, {24.897760, 1}, {20.046128, 1}, {0.046800, 1}, {0.046800, 1}, {0.062400, 1}, {0.062400, 1}, {0.062400,1}, {0.062400, 1}}



Notice that


Table[Timing[Integrate[BesselJ[0, x], {x, 0, Infinity}]], {i, 1, 10}]


returns only the first three iterations corrected.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...