Skip to main content

plotting - Animating a parametric plot


I am attempting to animate my parametric plot, but am having difficulties. I tried simply wrapping the plot code with an Animate[expression,{t,0,5}], but that hasn't worked, and I simply get a red animation screen. Any suggestions? Could someone tell me what is going wrong?



R= 2; l = 6; m = 9; g = -9.81; Subscript[t, 0] = 0; Subscript[t, f] = 1;

x[t_] = (l - R θ[t]) Cos[θ[t]] + R Sin[θ[t]];
y[t_] = R Cos[θ[t]] - (l - R θ[t]) Sin[θ[t]];

T = (1/2) m ((x'[t])^2 + (y'[t])^2);
U = m g (R Cos[θ[t]] - (l - R θ[t]) Sin[θ[t]]);
L = T - U;
EL[t_] = (D[L, θ[t]] - D[ D[L, θ'[t]], t]) // FullSimplify;


soln = NDSolve[{EL[t] == 0, θ[0] == 0, θ'[0] == 0}, θ, {t, Subscript[t, 0], Subscript[t, f]}];

ParametricPlot[ Evaluate[{(l - R θ[t]) Cos[θ[t]] + R Sin[θ[t]], R Cos[θ[t]] - (l - R θ[t]) Sin[θ[t]]} /. soln], {t, 0, 5}, AxesLabel -> y, PlotRange -> {10}]

Answer



First note that there are two errors in the ParametricPlot: (1) an error in the syntax of PlotRange, and (2) your time domain {t,0,5} goes outside the domain of the InterpolatingFunction. Be consistent with your choices of time domain by continuing to use t0 and tf, as shown below.


Second, as noted in the comments, avoid subscripts. I would use t0 in place of Subscript[t,0], although t[0] is another option.


Finally, note that because of the nature of the solution to the differential equation, θ(t) is oscillatory, and so the solution will trace out only a piece of the spiral you have plotted. I recommend plotting θ(t) directly to see this behavior.


Here is working code, with minimal changes that make it work, along with an animation where a point traces out the curve according to the solution of the differential equation.


r = 2; l = 6; m = 9; g = -9.81; t0 = 0; tf = 6.67;


x[t_] = (l - r θ[t]) Cos[θ[t]] + r Sin[θ[t]];
y[t_] = r Cos[θ[t]] - (l - r θ[t]) Sin[θ[t]];

kE = (1/2) m ((x'[t])^2 + (y'[t])^2);
pE = m g (r Cos[θ[t]] - (l - r θ[t]) Sin[θ[t]]);
lagrangian = kE - pE;
eL[t_] = (D[lagrangian, θ[t]] - D[D[lagrangian, θ'[t]], t]) //FullSimplify;

soln = NDSolve[{eL[t] == 0, θ[0] == 0, θ'[0] == 0}, θ, {t, t0, tf}];


Animate[ParametricPlot[{(l - r θ) Cos[θ] + r Sin[θ], r Cos[θ] - (l - r θ) Sin[θ]}, {θ, 0, -20}, Epilog -> {PointSize -> 0.015, Evaluate[Point[{(l - r θ[t]) Cos[θ[t]] + r Sin[θ[t]],r Cos[θ[t]] - (l - r θ[t]) Sin[θ[t]]}] /. soln[[1]]]}], {t, t0, tf}]

Here is the result of the animation:


enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]