Skip to main content

differential equations - Finding the eigenfunctions of one and two dimensional Harmonic Oscillator


(Edited) For finding the ground state wave function of:


$ H\psi(x) = (-1/2)d^2\psi(x)/dx^2 + (1/2)x^2\psi(x) = E \psi(x)$


I have written:


mOneDSchEq[n_] :=
Table[Switch[i - j, -1, p[x[i]],
0, (10/(n + 1))^2 q[x[i]] - 2 p[x[i]], 1, p[x[i]], _, 0], {i,
n}, {j, n}];


q[x_] := -x^2; p[x_] := 1;
Xarray[n_] := Do[x[i] = -5 + i 10/(n + 1), {i, 0, n + 1}];

EigVec[n_] := Eigenvectors[mOneDSchEq[n]];
lisEigVec = EigVec[35];
OneEigVec[j_] := Part[Reverse[lisEigVec], j];
y[i_] := Part[OneEigVec[1], i];
listOfPoints =
Join[{{x[0], 0}}, Table[{x[i], y[i]}, {i, 1, 35}], {{x[36], 0}}];

ListPlot[listOfPoints, PlotJoined -> True, PlotRange -> All,
PlotLabel -> "Ground State Wave Function of Harmonic Oscillator",
AxesLabel -> {"x", "y"}]

Which I have obtained the Gaussian, correctly.


The question that came to my mind is that:


Is it possible by knowing the ground stat eigenvalue, i.e. 1/2, solving the Schrödinger equation numerically, and obtain the ground state wave function? in other words, to solve:


$ H\psi(x) = (-1/2)d^2\psi(x)/dx^2 + (1/2)x^2\psi(x) = (1/2) \psi(x)$


or


$ H\psi(x) = (-1/2)d^2\psi(x)/dx^2 + (1/2)x^2\psi(x) = (3/2) \psi(x)$



So, I wrote:


s = NDSolve[{-(1/2) \[Psi]''[x] + (1/2) x^2(\[Psi][x]) == (1/2) \[Psi][
x], \[Psi][-5] == 0, \[Psi][5] == 0}, \[Psi], {x, -5, 5}]

Plot[Evaluate[\[Psi][x] /. s], {x, -5, 5}, PlotRange -> All]

BUT, I got nothing. What is the problem?


The other question is that, I was traveling through the website and found an elegant approach to two dimensional Harmonic Oscillator here.


My question is, if again we want to solve the Schrödinger equation numercally and obtain wave functions, now two dimensional, by knowing the eigenvalues, what should we do? For example:


$ H\psi(x,y) = (-1/2)(d^2/x^2 + d^2/dy^2)\psi(x,y) + (1/2)(x^2 + y^2)\psi(x,y) = (1) \psi(x,y) $



and


$ H\psi(x,y) = (-1/2)(d^2/x^2 + d^2/dy^2)\psi(x,y) + (1/2)(x^2 + y^2+ x y)\psi(x,y) = (0.96) \psi(x,y) $


Thanks for your attention!



Answer



To give another answer for the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, let's use a different approach based on the NDSolve functionality I alluded to in the linked answer. Edit: I also update the linked answer to include the analogue of this approach in two dimensions.


n = 2000;
a = .02;
grid = N[a Range[-n, n]];
derivative2 =
NDSolve`FiniteDifferenceDerivative[2, grid]["DifferentiationMatrix"]



SparseArray[<20009>,{4001,4001}]



potential = Map[(1/2 #^2) &, grid];

hamiltonian = -derivative2/2 +
DiagonalMatrix[SparseArray[potential]];

eigenvalues = Chop[Eigenvalues[hamiltonian, -10]]



{9.5, 8.5, 7.5, 6.5, 5.5, 4.5, 3.5, 2.5, 1.5, 0.5}



v = Chop[Eigenvectors[hamiltonian, -10]];

ListLinePlot[{Abs[v[[-1]]]^2, Abs[v[[-2]]]^2,
Abs[v[[-3]]]^2}, DataRange -> grid[[{1, -1}]],
PlotRange -> {{-4, 4}, All}]


plot of three functions


Here I used a grid spacing of a = 0.02 and get numerically very exact solutions for the lowest states of the harmonic oscillator.


The matrix representing the second derivatives (derivative2) in the Laplacian is generated using FiniteDifferenceDerivative.


To address some of the other issues in the question:


The initial code in the question didn't produce a result for me. However, since you state you got the desired result, I assume that there is some typo in the question. Definitely, one can improve the first code block by wrapping the generated Hamiltonian matrix in N to make it into a machine-precision matrix that can be diagonalized much faster.


However, the main question seems to have been: why does the differential equation


s = 
NDSolve[{-(1/2) ψ''[x] + (1/2) x^2 (ψ[x]) == (1/2) ψ[
x], ψ[-5] == 0, ψ[5] == 0}, ψ[x], {x, -5, 5}];
Clear[x];

ψSol[x_] = ψ[x] /. s[[1, 1]];

Plot[Evaluate[ψSol[x]], {x, -5, 5},
PlotRange -> All]

yield an apparently empty plot? The answer is that the boundary conditions are incorrect if you're looking for a non-trivial solution. The solver actually finds the only possible answer, $\psi(x)\equiv 0$ for all $x$. But this is because you forced the wave function to be zero at two points whereas the ground state by definition has no nodes!


So you should solve the following equation instead:


s = 
NDSolve[{-(1/2) ψ''[x] + (1/2) x^2 (ψ[x]) == (1/2) ψ[
x], ψ[0] == 1, ψ'[0] == 0}, ψ[x], {x, -5, 5}];

Clear[x];
ψSol[x_] = ψ[x] /. s[[1, 1]];

Plot[Evaluate[ψSol[x]], {x, -5, 5},
PlotRange -> All]

gaussian


This yields the expected Gaussian. I chose boundary conditions for the function to be 1 and its derivative to be 0 at the origin.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....