Skip to main content

mathematical optimization - Using compiled function inside NMinimize



Consider this code:


variable = Sin[x];
fun = Compile[{{x, _Real}}, variable, CompilationOptions -> {"InlineExternalDefinitions" -> True}];
NMinimize[fun[x], {x}]

This code returns:


 CompiledFunction::cfsa: Argument x at position 1 should be a machine-size real number. >>
{-1., {x -> -1.5707963267948966}}

Why do I get the error? How can I resolve this issue?



Edit


What if we use instead of Sin an expression like a+b? Because in reality I have an expression with 63 variable which must be find by NMinimize I cannot define a function of that expression and use it instead of Sin



Answer



Update



What if we use instead of Sin an expression like a+b?



I'll try a simple example, namely minimizing (a+3)2+(b−3)2. Making use of CompilationOptions, I'll define a function with two variables, then nest that inside another compiled function prior to minimization.


Needs["CompiledFunctionTools`"]


myfunction = Compile[{{a}, {b}}, (a + 3)^2 + (b - 3)^2]

With[{variable = myfunction},
fun = Compile[{{a, _Real}, {b, _Real}},
variable[a, b],
"RuntimeOptions" -> {"EvaluateSymbolically" -> False},
CompilationOptions -> {"InlineCompiledFunctions" -> True},
CompilationTarget -> "C"]
];


NMinimize[fun[x, y], {x, y}]

(* {1.97215*10^-30, {x -> -3., y -> 3.}} *)

You can add // Trace to the NMinimize to check for errors. For example, if you remove the line "RuntimeOptions" -> {"EvaluateSymbolically" -> False}, adding // Trace throws up the cfsa error from before.


And again, let's check all is well with the compilation.


CompilePrint[fun]

(*
2 arguments

5 Real registers
Underflow checking off
Overflow checking off
Integer overflow checking on
RuntimeAttributes -> {}

R0 = A1
R1 = A2
Result = R4


1 R2 = R0
2 R3 = R1
3 R4 = R2 + R3
4 Return
*)

No calls to MainEvaluate.


Original answer


This works for me.


With[{variable = Sin}, 

fun = Compile[{{a, _Real}}, variable[a],
"RuntimeOptions" -> {"EvaluateSymbolically" -> False}]
];
NMinimize[fun[x], x]

And let's check all is well:


Needs["CompiledFunctionTools`"]
With[{variable = Sin},
fun = Compile[{{a, _Real}}, variable[a],
"RuntimeOptions" -> {"EvaluateSymbolically" -> False},

CompilationTarget -> "C"]
];
CompilePrint[fun]

(*
1 argument
2 Real registers
Underflow checking off
Overflow checking off
Integer overflow checking on

RuntimeAttributes -> {}

R0 = A1
Result = R1

1 R1 = Sin[ R0]
2 Return
*)

As to why you get this problem, this question should answer it for you: Using a compiled function inside NIntegrate gives "CompiledFunction::cfsa" message



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]