Skip to main content

mathematical optimization - Using compiled function inside NMinimize



Consider this code:


variable = Sin[x];
fun = Compile[{{x, _Real}}, variable, CompilationOptions -> {"InlineExternalDefinitions" -> True}];
NMinimize[fun[x], {x}]

This code returns:


 CompiledFunction::cfsa: Argument x at position 1 should be a machine-size real number. >>
{-1., {x -> -1.5707963267948966}}

Why do I get the error? How can I resolve this issue?



Edit


What if we use instead of Sin an expression like a+b? Because in reality I have an expression with 63 variable which must be find by NMinimize I cannot define a function of that expression and use it instead of Sin



Answer



Update



What if we use instead of Sin an expression like a+b?



I'll try a simple example, namely minimizing $(a + 3)^2 + (b - 3)^2$. Making use of CompilationOptions, I'll define a function with two variables, then nest that inside another compiled function prior to minimization.


Needs["CompiledFunctionTools`"]


myfunction = Compile[{{a}, {b}}, (a + 3)^2 + (b - 3)^2]

With[{variable = myfunction},
fun = Compile[{{a, _Real}, {b, _Real}},
variable[a, b],
"RuntimeOptions" -> {"EvaluateSymbolically" -> False},
CompilationOptions -> {"InlineCompiledFunctions" -> True},
CompilationTarget -> "C"]
];


NMinimize[fun[x, y], {x, y}]

(* {1.97215*10^-30, {x -> -3., y -> 3.}} *)

You can add // Trace to the NMinimize to check for errors. For example, if you remove the line "RuntimeOptions" -> {"EvaluateSymbolically" -> False}, adding // Trace throws up the cfsa error from before.


And again, let's check all is well with the compilation.


CompilePrint[fun]

(*
2 arguments

5 Real registers
Underflow checking off
Overflow checking off
Integer overflow checking on
RuntimeAttributes -> {}

R0 = A1
R1 = A2
Result = R4


1 R2 = R0
2 R3 = R1
3 R4 = R2 + R3
4 Return
*)

No calls to MainEvaluate.


Original answer


This works for me.


With[{variable = Sin}, 

fun = Compile[{{a, _Real}}, variable[a],
"RuntimeOptions" -> {"EvaluateSymbolically" -> False}]
];
NMinimize[fun[x], x]

And let's check all is well:


Needs["CompiledFunctionTools`"]
With[{variable = Sin},
fun = Compile[{{a, _Real}}, variable[a],
"RuntimeOptions" -> {"EvaluateSymbolically" -> False},

CompilationTarget -> "C"]
];
CompilePrint[fun]

(*
1 argument
2 Real registers
Underflow checking off
Overflow checking off
Integer overflow checking on

RuntimeAttributes -> {}

R0 = A1
Result = R1

1 R1 = Sin[ R0]
2 Return
*)

As to why you get this problem, this question should answer it for you: Using a compiled function inside NIntegrate gives "CompiledFunction::cfsa" message



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...