Skip to main content

Dynamic does not update when wrapped in DynamicModule


I'm trying to wrap some dynamic code into DynamicModule to localize all the variables, yet when I do that, the variables stop updating.


That does not happen if I use Module instead. However, the variables get highlighted in red and when I hover over them with the mouse pointer the following message pops up: "A variable was used where it is probably not going to be evaluated before going out of scope".


The code in question is from Pickett's answer to my earlier question (AJAX-style HTTP calls triggered by a variable change):


url = "https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/geocode/json";

callback[_, "data", data_] := choices = extractsAddresses@First@FromCharacterCode[data]

Needs["GeneralUtilities`"]
extractsAddresses[data_] := ToAssociations[ImportString[data, "JSON"]][["results", All, "formatted_address"]]

fetchChoices[addr_] := URLFetchAsynchronous[
url,
callback,
"Parameters" -> {"address" -> addr}
]


Column[{
InputField[
Dynamic[s, (fetchChoices[#]; s = #) &],
String,
ContinuousAction -> True
],
Dynamic@choices
}]


And here is the version wrapped in DynamicModule:


Needs["GeneralUtilities`"]
DynamicModule[{url, callback, choices = "", fetchChoices, s},
url = "https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/geocode/json";
callback[_, "data", data_] :=
choices = extractsAddresses@First@FromCharacterCode[data];
extractsAddresses[data_] :=
ToAssociations[ImportString[data, "JSON"]][["results", All,
"formatted_address"]];
fetchChoices[addr_] :=

URLFetchAsynchronous[url, callback,
"Parameters" -> {"address" -> addr}];
Column[{InputField[Dynamic[s, (fetchChoices[#]; s = #) &], String,
ContinuousAction -> True], Dynamic@choices}]
]

What am I doing wrong?



Answer



I think you are actually not doing anything wrong but have found one of those cases where the automatic dependency tracking doesn't work (I think this is a bug and is also discussed in other questions, e.g. here, here or here). You can make the code work (version 10.1 on Windows) by explicitly telling the last Dynamic to track choices:


 Dynamic[choices,TrackedSymbols:>{choices}]


There are some things in your code that I probably would solve different (e.g. url is a constant and it is also unusual to localize function names like callback and fetchChoices as DynamicModule variables, also your function definitions would probably be better put into the Initialization option of DynamicModule). Here is a version which should work using the usual conventions:


Needs["GeneralUtilities`"];
With[{url="https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/geocode/json"},
DynamicModule[{choices="",string},
Column[{
InputField[
Dynamic[string,(fetchChoices[#];string=#)&],
String,ContinuousAction->True
],

Dynamic[choices,TrackedSymbols:>{choices}]
}],

Initialization:>(
Needs["GeneralUtilities`"];
callback[_,"data",data_]:=(
choices=extractAddresses@First@FromCharacterCode[data]
);
extractAddresses[data_]:=ToAssociations[
ImportString[data,"JSON"]

][["results",All,"formatted_address"]];
fetchChoices[addr_]:=URLFetchAsynchronous[
url,callback,"Parameters"->{"address"->addr}
];
)
]
]

when playing with this you will find that sometimes the shown choices seem to not match the current string. I think that is because it is not guaranteed that the asynchronous callbacks will return in the order in which they are issued. You might need to handle that for a real application, e.g. only update choices when the received value is from a later call then the currently shown...


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.