Skip to main content

evaluation - Unevaluated @ {args} versus Unevaluated /@ {args}


Working my way through Robby Villegas's lovely notes on withholding evaluation, I almost got Polish Notation on my first try. Here is my final solution, which seems to work well enough:


ClearAll[lispify];
SetAttributes[lispify, HoldAll];
lispify[h_[args___]] :=
Prepend[
lispify /@ Unevaluated @ {args},
lispify[h]];

lispify[s_ /; AtomQ[s]] := s;

lispify[Unevaluated[2^4 * 3^2]]

produces



{Times, {Power, 2, 4}, {Power, 3, 2}}



My first try had only one difference, namely


lispify /@ Unevaluated /@ {args}


and sent me down a frustrating rabbit hole until I stumbled on the corrected one above.


Would someone be so kind as to explain the details of both the correct and incorrect solution?


EDIT:


As a minor bonus, this enables a nice way to visualize unevaluated expression trees:


ClearAll[stringulateLisp];
stringulateLisp[l_List] := stringulateLisp /@ l;
stringulateLisp[e_] := ToString[e];
ClearAll[stringTree];
stringTree[l_List] := First[l][Sequence @@ stringTree /@ Rest[l]];

stringTree[e_] := e;
ClearAll[treeForm];
treeForm = TreeForm@*stringTree@*stringulateLisp@*lispify;
treeForm[Unevaluated[2^4 + 3^2]]

Mathematica graphics



Answer



You must remember that Unevaluated only "works" when it is the explicit head of an expression. In the non-working format the structure looks like:


TreeForm @ HoldForm[lispify /@ Unevaluated /@ {arg1, arg2}]


enter image description here


Note that Unevaluated does not surround arg1 and arg2 therefore they evaluate prematurely.


Now compare the working structure:


TreeForm @ HoldForm[lispify /@ Unevaluated @ {arg1, arg2}]

enter image description here


Here Unevaluated does surround arg1 and arg2 and evaluation is prevented.


See also:






By the way you can show an unevaluated TreeForm by using an additional Unevaluated to compensate for an apparent evaluation leak.


treeForm =
Function[expr, TreeForm @ Unevaluated @ Unevaluated @ expr, HoldFirst]

Test:


2^4*3^2 // treeForm

enter image description here


Also possibly of interest: Converting expressions to "edges" for use in TreePlot, Graph


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...