Skip to main content

How to remove all of the memory used by Mathematica


Backgroud


When I create the notebook,it will be made mess by me sometimes.If I use Remove to remove those variables,the memory cannot release still.So I have to close this mess notebook and restart the MMA to create another new notebook.I want to find way by programal method to avoid restarting the MMA,which can remove all of the variable and can release the memory.




Test code:


In[1]:= memory := Row[{"Memory Used:", MemoryInUse[]/1024^2., " MB"}];

memory
Out[2]= Memory Used:99.3511 MB

In[3]:= a = RandomReal[1, 20000000];
memory
Out[4]= Memory Used:255.345 MB

As we see,the value of memory used by Mathematica currently is 255.345MB.How to release it and make it back to 99.3511M?As I try,the ClearAll,Remove and ClearSystemCache cannot do this.




Update: As this answer,I change the test code to be following:



In[1]:= c`memory :=Row[{"Memory Used:", MemoryInUse[]/1024^2., " MB"}];
c`memory
Out[2]= Memory Used:58.117 MB

In[3]:= a = RandomReal[1, 20000000];
c`memory
Out[4]= Memory Used:216.487 MB

In[5]:= Unprotect[In, Out];
Clear[In, Out]

Quiet[Remove["`*"]]
$Line = 0;

In[1]:= c`memory
Out[1]= Memory Used:63.2716 MB

The last output is 63−58=5M lager than first output still.How to release it?



Answer



As Szabolcs wrote in this great answer, there are, from the old days, two functions that are meant to restore the kernel to its former state and recover as much memory as possible without having to restart it.


Try this on a fresh kernel:



memory := Row[{"Memory Used:", MemoryInUse[]/1024^2., " MB"}];
Needs["Utilities`CleanSlate`"]
memory
a = RandomReal[1, 20000000];
memory
CleanSlate[];
ClearInOut[];
memory

Mathematica graphics



All memory was recovered. Note that it only resets definitions that were made after the package was loaded, therefore in this case it didn't reset the definition for memory.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]