Skip to main content

algebraic manipulation - Limiting form of a polynomial expression


When simplifying an expression by hand, a trick that is often used is to remove terms that are lower powers of the independent variable, for instance, as $x \rightarrow \infty$,


$x^2 + x$



becomes simply


$x^2$


I am trying to replicate this functionality in Mathematica. Limit seems like an obvious choice, but


Limit[x^2 + x, x -> ∞]

simply returns $∞$ (not terribly helpful). Another option is Series, but it seems that one has to pass the highest power in the expression to get the desired result, with


Normal@Series[x^2 + x, {x, ∞, -2}]

returning the expected $x^2$. However, this does not work in general for more complicated expressions, when the highest power may not be so obvious. Consider the following example:


$\frac{x^2+x}{x+1}$



Mathematica code


(x^2+x)/(x+1)

We expect that the limiting form of this expression as $x \rightarrow \infty$ should be $x$ (the top becomes $x^2$, the bottom becomes $x$, and this then simplifies to $x$). However, if you just use the highest power available, Series returns 0 (you have to actually use Normal@Series[x^2 + x, {x, ∞, -1}]).


My question is, can anyone produce a generalized piece of code that can produce a limiting expression? It would be good if the procedure handled the other extreme as well, when the variable in question approaches 0 (in which case $x^2 + x$ would simplify to $x$).


Edit: It seems that the main issue for the solutions presented so far is that the form of the expression is not consistent. These operations are relatively easy to perform by hand, but sometimes tedious, which is why it would be nice to have Mathematica do it for me! Here's a pathological example that I can reduce by hand and for which the accepted solution should be able to return the correct result:


$\frac{\sqrt{x^3 + x}}{x^5 + x + 1} \frac{x^2}{x^{10} + x} + \frac{x^5 + x}{x}$


Mathematica code


Sqrt[x^3 + x]/(x^5 + x + 1) x^2/(x^10 + x) + (x^5 + x)/x


(The right answer is $x^4$)



Answer



The solution to this requires just a minor modification of my answer here:


ClearAll[limitingTerm1]
SetAttributes[limitingTerm1, HoldAll]
limitingTerm1[expr_, var_Symbol, func_] := var^Exponent[#, var, func] &@Simplify[expr]

This gives the right answer for both the examples provided by the OP:


limitingTerm1[(x^2 + x)/(x + 1), x, Max]
(* x *)


limitingTerm1[Sqrt[x^3 + x]/(x^5 + x + 1) x^2/(x^10 + x) + (x^5 + x)/x, x, Max]
(* x^4 *)



One can now generalize this to polynomials with arbitrary coefficients. It works as a two-pass approach, where the second pass is applied to the result of the first if its denominator still contains an x term. This seems to work very well in examples I've tested, but it might be possible to find edge cases where it doesn't work. Nevertheless, some modifications and extensions along these lines should help solve it.


ClearAll[limitingTerm2]
SetAttributes[limitingTerm2, HoldAll]
limitingTerm2[expr_, var_Symbol, func_] := Module[{term},
term := With[{pow = Exponent[#, var, func]}, Coefficient[#, var, pow] var^pow] &;

If[FreeQ[Denominator@#, x], #, term@Apart@#] &@term@Simplify[expr]
]

limitingTerm2[(a x^2 + bx)/(d + c x), x, Max]
(* (a x)/c *)

It also gives the correct answer for the other examples above.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....