formatting - Column makes fonts smaller

When you use Column (or Grid) a previously styled element with explicit font-size setting appears much smaller. Here is an example

cell = Framed[Style[(2*x^(3/2))/3, FontSize -> 14], 
   FrameMargins -> 10, 
   FrameStyle -> {AbsoluteThickness[1], LightGray}, 
   RoundingRadius -> 3];
{cell, Column[{cell}]}

Mathematica graphics

I looked through the options of Column, Grid, and GridBox but I couldn't find how I can prevent this when I output an expression with nested columns or grids. And setting the font-size larger, so that it appears to be non-scaled sounds like a bad idea.

Can anyone give me some insight?

With the help of Roman's answer, I could fix my layout. However, there seems to be a bug in Panel which does not respect the settings. Please compare the two usages of Panel without and with a title:

Column[{Item[cell, AllowScriptLevelChange -> False]}]
Panel[Column[{Item[cell, AllowScriptLevelChange -> False]}]]
Panel[Column[{Item[cell, AllowScriptLevelChange -> False]}], "Hello"]

Three different font-sizes. I simply removed the Panel as it was not extremely important.

Answer

There is an option for Column or Grid to avoid this: AllowScriptLevelChange

cell = Framed[Style[(2*x^(3/2))/3, FontSize -> 14], 
   FrameMargins -> 10, 
   FrameStyle -> {AbsoluteThickness[1], LightGray}, 
   RoundingRadius -> 3];
{cell, Column[{cell}, AllowScriptLevelChange -> False]}

UPDATE

Honestly, I don't know why Panel doesn't respect AllowScriptLevelChange. As a workaround you can use ScriptLevel -> 0 inside Style to fix the size of Panel with the title

cell2 = Framed[Style[(2*x^(3/2))/3, FontSize -> 14, ScriptLevel -> 0],
    FrameMargins -> 10, 
   FrameStyle -> {AbsoluteThickness[1], LightGray}, 
   RoundingRadius -> 3];

Panel[Column[{Item[cell]}], "Hello"]
Panel[Column[{Item[cell2]}], "Hello"]

Comments

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.

Blog

Search This Blog