Skip to main content

plotting - PlotLegends won't generate automatically more than 15 labels in v10


Update: NOT fixed in V10.0 - 12.0.0




While testing the examples from this recent post, i've noticed a problem in V.10 with PlotLegends when it has to automatically generate more than 15 labels (i.e. when there are more then 15 functions to plot). There's no problem with V.9.


The problem concerns the option values : Automatic and "Expressions". For example :



Plot[Evaluate[Range[20] + x], {x, -5, 5}, PlotLegends -> "Expressions"]

enter image description here


Plot[Evaluate[Range[20] + x], {x, -5, 5}, PlotLegends -> Automatic]

enter image description here


No problem however when you specify explicitly the labels in the legend :


Plot[Evaluate[Range[20] + x], {x, -5, 5}, PlotLegends -> Range[20]]

enter image description here




Answer



We may observe that the automatically generated legend limits the number of legend items to the number of available colors in the given color scheme. Using this utility function:


plot[scheme_] := Plot[Evaluate[Range[20] + x], {x, -5, 5},
PlotLegends -> "Expressions", PlotStyle -> scheme]

Observe the result for indexed color scheme #42 which has only four colors:


plot[42]

enter image description here


There are eight in #26:



plot[26]

enter image description here


As since there are 21 in #60 all your lines have a legend:


plot[60]

enter image description here


And if you specify a gradient color scheme:


Plot[Evaluate[Range[50] + x], {x, -5, 5}, PlotLegends -> "Expressions", 
PlotStyle -> "Rainbow"]


enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....