Skip to main content

graphics3d - Is there a way to increase the smoothness of a cylinder?


I am using Cylinder to produce wide flat disks (in Mathematica 8). This works just fine except that the circular base of such a cylinder turns out to be really just a 40-gon which is simply too coarse an approximation to a circle for what I have in mind. Is there a way to convince Mathematica to use say a 200-gon as a circular base for a cylinder?


Here is an example of the kind of picture that I am trying to create. Zoom in to see how coarse the cylinders' curved surfaces pan out.


Graphics3D[{Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 0.0011 {0.`, 0.`, -0.9510565162951536`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 0.0011 {0.`, 0.`, 0.9510565162951536`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.85065080835204`, 0.`, -0.42532540417601994`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 

    0.0011 {0.85065080835204`, 0.`, 0.42532540417601994`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.6881909602355868`, -0.5`, -0.42532540417601994`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.6881909602355868`, 0.5`, -0.42532540417601994`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.6881909602355868`, -0.5`, 0.42532540417601994`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.6881909602355868`, 0.5`, 0.42532540417601994`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 

    0.0011 {-0.2628655560595668`, -0.8090169943749475`, \
-0.42532540417601994`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.2628655560595668`, 
      0.8090169943749475`, -0.42532540417601994`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.2628655560595668`, -0.8090169943749475`, 
      0.42532540417601994`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.2628655560595668`, 0.8090169943749475`, 

      0.42532540417601994`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 0.0011 {0.`, 0.`, 0.`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 0.0011 {0.`, 0.`, 1.`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.42532540417602`, 0.3090169943749474`, 
      0.8506508083520399`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.7236067977499789`, 0.5257311121191336`, 
      0.4472135954999579`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 

    0.0011 {0.16245984811645317`, 0.5`, 0.8506508083520399`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.2628655560595668`, 0.8090169943749473`, 
      0.5257311121191336`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.27639320225002106`, 0.8506508083520399`, 
      0.4472135954999579`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.42532540417602`, -0.3090169943749474`, 
      0.8506508083520399`}}, .1], 

  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.7236067977499789`, -0.5257311121191336`, 
      0.4472135954999579`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.85065080835204`, 0.`, 0.5257311121191336`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.16245984811645317`, -0.5`, 0.8506508083520399`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.27639320225002106`, -0.8506508083520399`, 
      0.4472135954999579`}}, .1], 

  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.2628655560595668`, -0.8090169943749473`, 
      0.5257311121191336`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.5257311121191336`, 0.`, 0.8506508083520399`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.8944271909999159`, 0.`, 0.4472135954999579`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.6881909602355868`, -0.5`, 0.5257311121191336`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 

    0.0011 {0.6881909602355868`, 0.5`, 0.5257311121191336`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.7236067977499789`, -0.5257311121191336`, \
-0.4472135954999579`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.42532540417602`, -0.3090169943749474`, \
-0.8506508083520399`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 0.0011 {0.`, 0.`, -1.`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.2628655560595668`, -0.8090169943749473`, \

-0.5257311121191336`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.16245984811645317`, -0.5`, -0.8506508083520399`}}, .1],
   Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.27639320225002106`, -0.8506508083520399`, \
-0.4472135954999579`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.7236067977499789`, 
      0.5257311121191336`, -0.4472135954999579`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 

    0.0011 {0.42532540417602`, 
      0.3090169943749474`, -0.8506508083520399`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.85065080835204`, 0.`, -0.5257311121191336`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.27639320225002106`, 
      0.8506508083520399`, -0.4472135954999579`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.16245984811645317`, 0.5`, -0.8506508083520399`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 

    0.0011 {0.2628655560595668`, 
      0.8090169943749473`, -0.5257311121191336`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.8944271909999159`, 0.`, -0.4472135954999579`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.5257311121191336`, 0.`, -0.8506508083520399`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.6881909602355868`, 0.5`, -0.5257311121191336`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.6881909602355868`, -0.5`, -0.5257311121191336`}}, .1], 

  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 0.0011 {0.`, 1.`, 0.`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.5877852522924731`, 0.8090169943749473`, 0.`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.9510565162951535`, 0.3090169943749474`, 0.`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.9510565162951535`, -0.3090169943749474`, 0.`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {-0.5877852522924731`, -0.8090169943749473`, 0.`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 0.0011 {0.`, -1.`, 0.`}}, .1], 

  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.5877852522924731`, -0.8090169943749473`, 0.`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.9510565162951535`, -0.3090169943749474`, 0.`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.9510565162951535`, 0.3090169943749474`, 0.`}}, .1], 
  Cylinder[{{0, 0, 0}, 
    0.0011 {0.5877852522924731`, 0.8090169943749473`, 0.`}}, .1]}]

Answer



You can fix this problem by using the following Option in Graphics3D:



Method -> {"CylinderPoints" -> {200, 1}}

Adjust 200 to match your requirements. (Indeed the default is 40.)


Edit: I don't know exactly what the second parameter does, but using the single parameter form shown in the documentation linked below results in a big slow-down. I could guess that it is points in the other direction but that doesn't seem to make sense. Anyway I can't tell the visual difference between {200, 1} and {200, 200} but the former is much faster than the latter. ("CylinderPoints" -> 200 is apparently equivalent to "CylinderPoints" -> {200, 200}.)


You can make the change permanent with the Option Inspector by changing this value in the Graphics3DBoxOptions:


enter image description here


From Three-Dimensional Graphics Primitives:



Even though Cone, Cylinder, Sphere, and Tube produce high-quality renderings, their usage is scalable. A single image can contain thousands of these primitives. When rendering so many primitives, you can increase the efficiency of rendering by using special options to change the number of points used by default to render Cone, Cylinder, Sphere, and Tube. The "ConePoints" Method option to Graphics3D is used to reduce the rendering quality of each individual cone. Cylinder, sphere, and tube quality can be similarly adjusted using "CylinderPoints", "SpherePoints", and "TubePoints", respectively.




40 points:


enter image description here


200 points:


enter image description here


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...
Post a Comment
Read more

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...
Post a Comment
Read more