Skip to main content

bugs - Solving integro-differential equation with DSolve in MMA 11.0


In this question DSolve(symbolic solution) gives wrong answer.


I analyzed the 13 equations in which DSolve gives the same solution.


 ClearAll["Global`*"];
Remove["Global`*"];

eqn1 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[y'[t], {t, 0, x}];

eqn2 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[y'[x - t], {t, 0, x}];
eqn3 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[y[x - t], {t, 0, x}];
eqn4 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[y'[x + t], {t, 0, x}];
eqn5 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[y[x + t], {t, 0, x}];
eqn6 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[2*y'[t], {t, 0, x}];
eqn7 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[t*y'[t], {t, 0, x}];
eqn8 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[x*y'[t], {t, 0, x}];
eqn9 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[y[t]/(1 + x), {t, 0, x}];
eqn10 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[y'[t]/(1 + x), {t, 0, x}];
eqn11 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[y'[t]/(1 + t), {t, 0, x}];

eqn12 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[y'[t]*Sin[t], {t, 0, x}];
eqn13 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[y'[t]*Sin[x], {t, 0, x}];

ic = {y[0] == 0, y'[0] == 0};

sol1 = y[x] /. First@DSolve[{eqn1, ic}, y@x, x](*Wrong solution.It should be: y[x]=x^2/2 *)
sol2 = y[x] /. First@DSolve[{eqn2, ic}, y@x, x](*Wrong solution*)
sol3 = y[x] /. First@DSolve[{eqn3, ic}, y@x, x](*Wrong solution*)
sol4 = y[x] /. First@DSolve[{eqn4, ic}, y@x, x](*Wrong solution*)
sol5 = y[x] /. First@DSolve[{eqn5, ic}, y@x, x](*Wrong solution*)

sol6 = y[x] /. First@DSolve[{eqn6, ic}, y@x, x](*Wrong solution*)
sol7 = y[x] /. First@DSolve[{eqn7, ic}, y@x, x](*Wrong solution*)
sol8 = y[x] /. First@DSolve[{eqn8, ic}, y@x, x](*Wrong solution*)
sol9 = y[x] /. First@DSolve[{eqn9, ic}, y@x, x](*Wrong solution*)
sol10 = y[x] /. First@DSolve[{eqn10, ic}, y@x, x](*Wrong solution*)
sol11 = y[x] /. First@DSolve[{eqn11, ic}, y@x, x](*Wrong solution*)
sol12 = y[x] /. First@DSolve[{eqn12, ic}, y@x, x](*Wrong solution*)
sol13 = y[x] /. First@DSolve[{eqn13, ic}, y@x, x](*Wrong solution*)

Gives (*1/2 E^-x (-1 + E^x)^2*) the same answer for 13 equations?



The question is: is a bug?


Other equations that DSolve give wrong answer:


eqn14 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[1 + y'[t], {t, 0, x}];
eqn15 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[x + y'[t], {t, 0, x}];
eqn16 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[t + y'[t], {t, 0, x}];
eqn17 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[x + y[t], {t, 0, x}];
eqn18 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[t + y[t], {t, 0, x}];
eqn19 = y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - Integrate[1 + y[t], {t, 0, x}];

Checks eqn19 equation:



sol19 = y[x] /. First@DSolve[{eqn19, ic}, y@x, x]
(D[#, {x, 2}] == 1 + # - Integrate[(1 + (# /. x -> t)), {t, 0, x}]) & /@ {sol19} // FullSimplify
(* {2 + x^2 == 2 (E^-x + x)} *)

not True.


Edited:


From Wolfram Technical Support:


Thank you for contacting Wolfram Technical Support. I have confirmed that DSolve is giving the wrong result for the examples you provided by direct substitution. I have filed a report with our developers regarding this issue, and included the example equations you provided. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. RE: [CASE:3808125]



Answer



A clear pattern emerges. (The initial conditions are ignored for generality.)



(y[x] /. First@DSolve[#, y[x], x]) & /@ {eqn1, eqn2, eqn3, eqn4, eqn5,
eqn6, eqn7, eqn8, eqn9, eqn10, eqn11, eqn12, eqn13}
(* {-1 + E^x C[1] + E^-x C[2], -1 + E^x C[1] + E^-x C[2], -1 + E^x C[1] + E^-x C[2], ... *)

indeed gives the same answer in each case, and the answer is the same as that from


(y[x] /. First@DSolve[#, y[x], x]) &[y''[x] == 1 + y[x]]
(* -1 + E^x C[1] + E^-x C[2] *)

Evidently, the integral is set to zero by DSolve. Consider next the second set of equations


(y[x] /. First@DSolve[#, y[x], x]) & /@ {eqn14, eqn15, eqn16, eqn17, eqn18, eqn19}

(* {-1 + x + E^x C[1] + E^-x C[2], 1 + x^2 + E^x C[1] + E^-x C[2],
x^2/2 + E^x C[1] + E^-x C[2], 1 + x^2 + E^x C[1] + E^-x C[2],
x^2/2 + E^x C[1] + E^-x C[2], -1 + x + E^x C[1] + E^-x C[2]} *)

Now, compare these with the following, obtained by explicitly integrating the portions of the integrands independent of y and discarding the portions dependent on y.


(y[x] /. First@DSolve[y''[x] == 1 + y[x] - #, y[x], x]) & /@ {x, x^2, x^2/2, x^2, x^2/2, x}

The outputs are identical to those just above. DSolve simply ignores y-dependent integrands. Incidentally, this same behavior occurs in the equation of the earlier question cited in the first line of this question.


Surely, this is a bug.


Version 11.1 update (Still true for 11.3)



DSolve now returns unevaluated for all thirteen equations. Although perhaps unsatisfying, this certainly is better than returning the wrong answer.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...