Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Working with a system of differential equations that cannot be solved explicitly


I have to work a lot with three functions $\;o_1(t), o_2(t), o_3(t)\;$ that are solutions to a certain system of differential equations:


Halp = {
D[o1[t], t] == o1[t]*o2[t] + o1[t]*o3[t] - o2[t]*o3[t],
D[o2[t], t] == o1[t]*o2[t] + o2[t]*o3[t] - o1[t]*o3[t],
D[o3[t], t] == o1[t]*o3[t] + o2[t]*o3[t] - o1[t]*o2[t]}
sol = DSolve[Halp, {o1[t], o2[t], o3[t]}, {t}]


The system cannot be solved explicitly with Mathematica, but I do not need the solution. What I would like to do is to compute higher order derivatives assuming that $o_1(t)$, $o_2(t)$, and $o_3(t)$ are solutions to the above system.


How could I tell Mathematica to do this?



Answer



There are many ways which one could exploit. For example let's use calculate o1''[t] eliminating o1'[t], o2'[t], o3'[t]. We can use Eliminate:


#1/.( Eliminate[ Join[ D[Halp, t], Halp], {#2, #3}] //ToRules)&[o1''[t], o2''[t], o3''[t]]


2 o1[t] o2[t]^2 + 2 o1[t] o2[t] o3[t] - 2 o2[t]^2 o3[t] + 2 o1[t] o3[t]^2 - 2 o2[t] o3[t]^2 


Changing the order in the square bracket we can calculate o2''[t] and o3''[t].


For the third order derivative of e.g. o1[t] we can eliminate other dependent variables in many different ways, let's point out one of them:


#1 /.( 
Eliminate[ Join[ D[Halp, {t, 2}], D[Halp, t], Halp], {##2}]
//ToRules) &[o1'''[t], o2'''[t], o3'''[t], o2''[t], o3''[t], o1''[t]]


  2 o1[t]^2 o2[t]^2 + 4 o1[t] o2[t]^3 - 4 o1[t]^2 o2[t] o3[t] + 8 o1[t] o2[t]^2 o3[t]
- 4 o2[t]^3 o3[t] + 2 o1[t]^2 o3[t]^2 + 8 o1[t] o2[t] o3[t]^2 - 10 o2[t]^2 o3[t]^2
+ 4 o1[t] o3[t]^3 - 4 o2[t] o3[t]^3


In the above we eliminated all dependent variables starting from the second position in the square bracket (note very useful sign ##n i.e. SlotSequence ) and calculated o1'''[t]. Of course you can try to get rid of different dependent variables. In general this is a difficult issue to decide which dependent variables could be eliminated and how they could be represented by another variables. I suggest to take a closer look at GroebnerBasis with the MonomialOrder -> EliminationOrder option.


GroebnerBasis[ polys, vars, elims, MonomialOrder -> EliminationOrder]

If given equations are relatively simple you can't observe a common problem in differential elimination - so called intermediate expresssion swell. For interesting mathematical issues related to the problem I'd suggest to study e.g. a recent monograph Involution by Werner Seiler (Springer 2009). However I couldn't mention interesting packages in Mathematica related to differential elimination (there are such packages e.g. in Maple).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...