Skip to main content

probability or statistics - How do I calculate Standard Deviation confidence intervals in Mathematica?


I have a series of simulation results and I would like to demonstrate how the confidence interval for the mean and standard deviation decrease as the number of results increases.


I have done this for the mean using the inbuilt MeanCI function as shown below (I've replaced my simulation results with random data).


Needs["HypothesisTesting`"]
data = Table[RandomReal[{-1, 1}], {i, 1, 100}];
movingData = Table[data[[1 ;; i]], {i, 2, Length[data]}];
meanCI = MeanCI[#, ConfidenceLevel -> .80] & /@ movingData;

ListPlot[Transpose[meanCI]]

enter image description here


What I would like to do is create a similar chart showing how the standard deviation confidence interval decreases. There isn't a standard function for StandardDeviationCI but is there a way to use the tools inside the HypothesisTesting package to get a similar result?



Answer



The standard deviation confidence interval may be obtained via Sqrt@VarianceCI[sample]. If $X_1, X_2,\dots,X_n$ are iid observations from a normal distribution, then $${(n-1)\,s^2\over\sigma^2} \approx \chi^2_{n-1}\,.$$ The confidence interval for $\sigma$ or $\sigma^2$ can be computed from the sample and the $\chi^2$ distribution. This is what VarianceCI does. The sample means of a normal distribution are distributed according to a Student $t$ distribution if $\sigma$ is unknown. The confidence interval can be computed from the $t$ distribution, and this is what MeanCI does.


The OP's example data is from a uniform distribution, not a normal distribution. When the sample size is over 50, the error appears to be practically negligible (compared to the appropriate UniformSumDistribution). I don't know how to compute the exact distribution of the standard deviation, but since the sampling distribution approaches a normal distribution, I will assume that VarianceCI will be adequately approximate for larger sample sizes.


The plot below shows the sample standard deviation $s$ bracketed by the confidence interval for $\sigma$. One may notice that the confidence interval is not symmetric. That is because the \chi^2 distribution is skewed.


Needs["HypothesisTesting`"];
SeedRandom[1];

data = RandomReal[{-1, 1}, 100];
sdci = Table[
Sqrt@VarianceCI[data[[1 ;; i]], ConfidenceLevel -> .80], {i, 2, Length[data]}];
ListPlot[Transpose[sdci] ~Append~
Table[StandardDeviation[data[[1 ;; i]]], {i, 2, Length[data]}]]

Mathematica graphics


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...