Skip to main content

functions - How can I make assignments persist across sessions?


Yesterday, I imported a large set of data into a Mathematica notebook and stored each imported list of numbers in a function. For example, I would map a list like {10, 20, 30} to a function value as shown below



f[0] = {10, 20 30};
f[1] = {40, 50, 60};

With the lists stored in the functions I generated the below chart by writing


averageComparisonChart = 
BarChart[{fpAverages, fpiAverages},
ChartLabels -> {{"FP Quicksort", "FP Insertion Quicksort"},
Range[0, 160, 10]}, AxesLabel -> {HoldForm["Vector size"],
HoldForm["Execution time (ms)"]}, PlotLabel -> HoldForm["Quicksort vs.
Insertion sort"], LabelStyle -> {GrayLevel[0]}]


which output


bar chart


Before going to bed, I saved my notebook and shut down my computer. Today, all my functions have been reset. For example inputting f[0] outputs f[0] rather than the previously assigned list {10, 20, 30}.


Does anyone know what has caused this issue? How can a loss of data be avoided in the future? Is there a better way to store lists than in functions? Is there a way to restore the values from yesterday?


Related Question


The accepted answer to this question provides a method for creating persistence of data between sessions.



Answer



If you wrap your definitions in Once then their results will be remembered across sessions:


f[0] = Once[Print["a"]; {10, 20, 30}, "Local"]


Here the printing and the numbers {10, 20, 30} are used instead of a lengthy calculation that you only want to do once and whose result you want to remember in the next session.


On the first execution, the above code prints "a" and assigns the numbers {10, 20, 30} to f[0]. On subsequent executions (even after you've closed Mathematica and come back and are reevaluating the notebook), the execution of the first argument of Once does not take place any more, so there is no printing, and only the remembered result {10, 20, 30} is directly assigned to f[0]. This speeds up the reprocessing on subsequent executions dramatically if the list {10, 20, 30} is replaced with something hard to compute.


With Once you don't need to save/restore semi-manually as some comments suggest with Save, DumpSave, Get. Instead, persistent storage operates transparently to cache what has been calculated before.


If you place these Once calls within an initialization cell/group, then you have something resembling a persistent assignment.


Once has more options: you can specify in which cache the persistent storage should be (in the front end session, or locally so that even when you close and reopen Mathematica it's still there) and how long it should persist. See below for more details about storage management.


Another way to create persistent objects is with PersistentValue, which is a bit lower-level than Once but basically the same mechanism.


But Once is terribly slow!


It is true that retrieval from persistent storage is rather slow, taking several milliseconds even for the simplest lookups. Memoization, on the other hand, is very fast (nanoseconds) but impermanent. We can simply combine these two methods to achieve speed and permanence! For example,


g[n_] := g[n] = Once[Pause[1]; n^2, "Local"]


defines a function g[n] that, for every kernel session, only calls Once one time and then memoizes the result. We now have three timescales:




  • The very first call of g[4], for example, takes about one second (in this case) because it actually executes the body of the function definition:


    g[4] // AbsoluteTiming
    (* {1.0096, 16} *)


  • In each subsequent kernel session, the first call of g[4] takes a few milliseconds to retrieve the result from persistent storage:



    g[4] // AbsoluteTiming
    (* {0.009047, 16} *)


  • After this first call, every further call of g[4] only takes a few nanoseconds because of classical memoization:


    g[4] // RepeatedTiming
    (* {1.5*10^-7, 16} *)


How to categorize, inspect, and delete persistent objects



A certain wariness with persistent storage is in order. Note that persistent storage will never be consulted unless you explicitly wrap an expression in Once; there is no problem with these persistent objects contaminating unrelated calculations.


Nonetheless in practice I keep the persistent storage pool as clean as possible. The principal tool is to segregate persistent values from different calculations by storing them in different directories on the storage medium. For a given calculation, we can set up a storage location with, for example,


cacheloc = PersistenceLocation["Local", 
FileNameJoin[{$UserBaseDirectory, "caches", "mycalculation"}]]

If you don't do this (or set cacheloc = "Local" as in the f[0] and g[4] examples above), then all persistent values are stored in the $DefaultLocalBase directory. We can always simply delete such storage directories in order to clean up.


We use persistent storage to remember calculations in such a specific directory with


A = Once["hello", cacheloc]

As the documentation states, you can inspect the storage pool with



PersistentObjects["Hashes/Once/*", cacheloc]
(* {PersistentObject["Hashes/Once/Di20M1m4sLB", PersistenceLocation["Local", ...]]} *)

which gives you a list of persistent objects (identified by their hash strings) and where they are stored (in the kernel, locally, etc.). To see what each persistent object contains, run


PersistentObjects["Hashes/Once/*", cacheloc] /. 
PersistentObject[hash_, _[loc_, ___]] :>
{hash, loc, PersistentValue[hash, cacheloc]} // TableForm
(* Hashes/Once/Di20M1m4sLB Local Hold["hello"] *)

If we want to delete only the persistent element containing "hello" then we run



DeleteObject /@ PersistentObjects["Hashes/Once/Di20M1m4sLB", cacheloc];

and if we want to delete all persistent objects in this cache, we run


DeleteObject /@ PersistentObjects["Hashes/Once/*", cacheloc];



Usage examples: 199017


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.