Skip to main content

performance tuning - Faster Alternatives to DateDifference


I need a faster implementation of FractionOfYear and FractionOfMonth, which do the following:



Input: A time/date specified by {y_, m_, d_, h_, n_, s_}


Output: A real number from 0 to 1 representing the fraction of the year or month that the given time/date spec occurs in.


Leap days and leap seconds complicate things, so I thought I could just rely on DateDifference, but it is too slow:


RandomDateList[] := {RandomInteger[{1800, 2100}], RandomInteger[{1, 12}], RandomInteger[{1, 28}], RandomInteger[{0, 23}], RandomInteger[{0, 59}], RandomInteger[{0, 59}]};
RandomDates[n_] := Table[RandomDateList[],{n}]

secondOfYear[{y_, m_, d_, h_, n_, s_}] := 
   First[DateDifference[{y - 1, 12, 31, 24, 0, 0}, {y, m, d, h, n, s}, 
               "Second"]] / First[DateDifference[{y - 1, 12, 31, 24, 0, 0}, {y, 12, 31, 24, 0, 0}, "Second"]]


secondOfMonth[{y_, m_, d_, h_, n_, s_}] := First[DateDifference[{y, m, 1, 0, 0, 0}, 
{y, m, d, h, n, s}, "Second"]]/First[DateDifference[{y, m, 1, 0, 0, 0}, If[m==12, {y+1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0}, {y, m+1, 1, 0, 0, 0}], "Second"]]

AbsoluteTiming [secondOfYear /@ RandomDates[1000]] takes 6 seconds.


There must be a faster easier way of doing this! I'll accept the first answer that takes under a second for 100,000 elements.



Answer



Ok, Java solution, by popular demand.


Solution





  1. Load the Java reloader




  2. Compile this class:


    JCompileLoad@
      "import java.util.Calendar;

       public class SecondOfYearVectorized{  
         public static double[] secondOfYear(int[][] dates){
            Calendar calendar = Calendar.getInstance();

            double[] result = new double[dates.length];
            for(int i=0;i            calendar.set(dates[i][0],dates[i][1]-1,dates[i][2],
                      dates[i][3], dates[i][4],dates[i][5]);
                long time = (long) (calendar.getTimeInMillis()/1000);
                calendar.set(dates[i][0]-1,11,31,24,0,0);
                long timepy = (long) (calendar.getTimeInMillis()/1000);
                calendar.set(dates[i][0],11,31,24,0,0);
                long timey = (long) (calendar.getTimeInMillis()/1000);
                result[i]= ((double)(timepy-time))/(timepy-timey);

            }   
            return result;      
        }
    }"


Usage and comparisons


dates = RandomDates[100000];

SecondOfYearVectorized`secondOfYear[dates]//Short//AbsoluteTiming



  {0.2460938,{0.310529,0.0296395,<<99996>>,0.0393697,0.0470913}}

N[secondOfYear2 /@ dates]//Short//AbsoluteTiming


  {1.5937500,{0.310643,0.0296395,<<99996>>,0.0393697,0.0470913}}

Remarks



The Java solution seems about 6 times faster than Brett's one, and about 4 times faster than the fastest vectorized solution I could cook up with AbsoluteTime. The AbsoluteTime itself is pretty fast though, so I don't know to what should I attribute the speed-up (my guess is that I save on data transfer, which causes a performance hit, since I only transfer data once. And probably Java Calendar-based functionality is still faster by itself). Note that results obtained with Java and Mathematica solution are only approximately the same, but the differences are quite small, when any. Note also that Java solution reaches full speed after several runs, likely due to a warm-up of JVM HotSpot JIT compiler.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...
Post a Comment
Read more

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more