Skip to main content

plotting - How do I make framed plots the same size?


Suppose that I have two plots, plot1 and plot2. The plots have different ranges and different axes. Here is a fictitious example that makes no scientific sense, but demonstrates my issue with the size of framed plots:


imgSize = 475;

plot1 = Plot[x^2, {x, 0, 1}, Frame -> True,
FrameLabel -> {"x (nm)", "y (nm)"},
BaseStyle -> {FontFamily -> "Arial", 20}, ImageSize -> imgSize];

plot2 = Plot[x^2, {x, -10, 10}, PlotRange -> {-10, 1000},

Frame -> True,
FrameLabel -> {"\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[SubscriptBox[\"x\", \"a\"], \
\"2\"]\) (\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\"nm\", \"2\"]\))",
"\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[SubscriptBox[\"y\", \"b\"], \"2\"]\) (\!\(\
\*SuperscriptBox[\"nm\", \"2\"]\))"},
BaseStyle -> {FontFamily -> "Arial", 20}, ImageSize -> imgSize];

Grid[{{plot1, plot2}}]

I get this output:



plotsize


Notice that plot1 and plot2 are not really the same size -- in terms of the size of the outer frame of each. In particular, the outer frame of plot1 has greater height than that of plot2. In addition, I think that the outer frame of plot1 has greater width than that of plot2. I think this is because of the different ranges and different axis labels of the two plots.


Observed separately, one probably could not discern a difference in size between plot1 and plot2. But when they are next to each other, as in a Grid, plot1 looks noticeably "larger" than plot2. This would look rather poor in a publication, like an article in a scientific journal.


Is there any way that I can make the outer frames the same size, such that the plots look like they are the same size?



Answer



As Jagra said, the usual solution is to manually specify the ImagePadding values. The problem is that if the plot or frame labels are too large, a fixed ImagePadding may cut them off.


But can we automate this?


Ideally what we would do is:





  • Create the two plots of fixed vertical size and retrieve their vertical ImagePadding




  • Change the ImagePadding of both to use the larger value. This will ensure that they have the same size while no labels are cut off.




So how do we measure the ImagePadding of an existing plot? This is unfortunately tricky as the value depends on the size of the plot. Since the plots will be stacked horizontally, we need to fix the vertical image size before trying to retrieve the padding. But here's a pretty useful solution (that I use regularly):



First note that I'm fixing the vertical size instead of the horizontal one. This allows the graphics to have differing horizontal sizes if necessary while still aligning perfectly when stacked in a row.


verticalSize = 250;


plot1 = Plot[x^2, {x, 0, 1}, Frame -> True,
FrameLabel -> {"x (nm)", "y (nm)"},
BaseStyle -> {FontFamily -> "Arial", 20},
ImageSize -> {Automatic, verticalSize}];

plot2 = Plot[x^2, {x, -10, 10}, PlotRange -> {-10, 1000},
Frame -> True,
FrameLabel -> {"\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[SubscriptBox[\"x\", \"a\"], \
\"2\"]\) (\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\"nm\", \"2\"]\))",

"\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[SubscriptBox[\"y\", \"b\"], \"2\"]\) \
(\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\"nm\", \"2\"]\))"},
BaseStyle -> {FontFamily -> "Arial", 20},
ImageSize -> {Automatic, verticalSize}];

This function measures the padding (based on @Heike's code):


getPadding[g_] := Module[{im},
im = Image[Show[g, LabelStyle -> White, Background -> White]];
BorderDimensions[im]
]


Now let's choose the larger one of both the top and bottom paddings of the two figures. This will give us the minimum image padding that still does not cut off labels.


{p1h, p1v} = getPadding[plot1];

{p2h, p2v} = getPadding[plot2];

verticalPadding = Max /@ Transpose[{p1v, p2v}]

Row[{
Show[plot1, ImagePadding -> {p1h, verticalPadding}],

Show[plot2, ImagePadding -> {p2h, verticalPadding}]
}]

Mathematica graphics


The problem with this approach is that often one would wish to fix the horizontal size of the whole graphic (to fit the text width of the document). I admit that when I had the same problem I did this by iteratively refining the sizes, which is not very elegant, but produces good results automatically.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...