Skip to main content

performance tuning - Extract substring up to specific character non-inclusive


I was wondering if there is a way with StringCases to start at the beginning of a string and stop one character before a known character.



s = {{"This is small string 2 !"}, {"There is string 5 ! Or is it 2?"},
{"This is String n !"}};

My problem is that I have a lot of these strings and not all are the same length and some have more characters after the exclamation mark.


I know it involves this code:


StringCases[#, Shortest[StartOfString~~___~~ ????????]]& /@ s

But I don't know how to finish it (where the ??????? are).


I would like my end result to look like this:


final={{"This is small string 2 "},{"There is string 5 "},{"This is String n "}}


I have tried searching for this on the forums and have had no luck.


If you could provide an answer or even a direction to go, that would be very much appreciated!


Thanks!


Also, if this isn't the most efficient way of doing this, or if you have any questions, please let me know.



Answer



Use named Pattern to extract a part of matched substring:


StringCases[#, str : Shortest[StartOfString ~~ ___] ~~ "!" :> str] & /@ s



{{{"This is small string 2 "}}, {{"There is string 5 "}}, {{"This is String n "}}}

or


StringCases[#, str : Shortest[StartOfString ~~ ___] ~~ "!" :> str] &@Flatten@ s


{{"This is small string 2 "}, {"There is string 5 "}, {"This is String n "}}



As Martin notes in the comments, another approach is to capture Longest sequence of characters from a negated character class. In this case we don't have to use a named pattern which introduce additional overhead, hence this approach should be more efficient. Since string patterns by default are greedy, Longest can be omitted in this case:



StringCases[#, StartOfString ~~ Except["!"] ...] &

Translating StringExpressions into equivalent regular expressions sometimes gives substantial increase in performance: this is what Mathematica always does under the hood, but not always in the optimal way. Here is verbatim semantic translation:


StringCases[#, RegularExpression["^[^!]*"]] &

(read here on how to find out what a regex Mathematica generates from a StringExpression).


And another regex without capturing group and without use of a negated character class:


StringCases[#, RegularExpression["^.*?(?=!)"]] &

Note that this last regex can't be expressed as a combination of usual Wolfram Language patterns because it uses a positive lookahead zero-length assertion which has no equivalent in the world of Wolfram Language symbolic pattern objects.





Performance comparison


Here is a timing comparison of the all suggested solutions (on a very large number of short strings):


$HistoryLength = 0;
s1 = ConstantArray["There is string 5 ! Or is it 2?", 2*10^5];

{First@AbsoluteTiming[# /@ s1], #} & /@ {
StringCases[#, str : Shortest[StartOfString ~~ ___] ~~ "!" :> str] &,
StringCases[#, RegularExpression["^(.*?)!"] -> "$1"] &,
StringCases[#, StartOfString ~~ Except["!"] ...] &,

StringCases[#, RegularExpression["^[^!]*"]] &,
StringCases[#, RegularExpression["^.*?(?=!)"]] &,
StringDelete[#, "!" ~~ ___] &, StringExtract[#, "!" -> 1] &,
StringTake[#, StringPosition[#, "!", 1][[1, 1]] - 1] &,
StringDrop[#, {StringPosition[#, "!", 1][[1, 1]], -1}] &} //
Grid[#, Frame -> All, Alignment -> Left, FrameStyle -> Directive[Thin, LightGray]] &

MaxMemoryUsed[]



grid


102886352

Another comparison suggested by Martin (on a string where it takes a while to find the "!"):


$HistoryLength = 0;
s2 = StringRepeat["There is string 5 ", 10^5] <> "! Or is it 2?";
results = {};

{(AppendTo[results, #2]; #1) & @@ AbsoluteTiming[#@s2], #} & /@ {
StringCases[#, str : Shortest[StartOfString ~~ ___] ~~ "!" :> str][[1]] &,

StringCases[#, RegularExpression["^(.*?)!"] -> "$1"][[1]] &,
StringCases[#, StartOfString ~~ Except["!"] ...][[1]] &,
StringCases[#, RegularExpression["^[^!]*"]][[1]] &,
StringCases[#, RegularExpression["^.*?(?=!)"]][[1]] &,
StringDelete[#, "!" ~~ ___] &,
StringExtract[#, "!" -> 1] &,
StringTake[#, StringPosition[#, "!", 1][[1, 1]] - 1] &,
StringDrop[#, {StringPosition[#, "!", 1][[1, 1]], -1}] &} //
Grid[#, Frame -> All, Alignment -> Left, FrameStyle -> Directive[Thin, LightGray]] &


SameQ @@ results

MaxMemoryUsed[]


grid


True

82707472


The conclusion: Martin's solution via negated character class with greedy quantifier outperforms others in general: RegularExpression["^[^!]*"]. See this dedicated Q&A about why the equivalent string expression StartOfString ~~ Except["!"] ... is two orders of magnitude slower.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...