Skip to main content

output formatting - How to keep Collect[] result in order?


For example,


Collect[(1 + x + Cos[s] x^2)^3, x]


gives the result


1 + 3 x + 3 x^5 Cos[s]^2 + x^6 Cos[s]^3 + x^2 (3 + 3 Cos[s]) + x^3 (1 + 6 Cos[s]) 
+ x^4 (3 Cos[s] + 3 Cos[s]^2)

Terms of the form $x^n$ are in random order. I would like the result is to be as follows:


 1 + 3 x + x^2 (3 + 3 Cos[s]) + x^3 (1 + 6 Cos[s]) +  
x^4 (3 Cos[s] + 3 Cos[s]^2) + 3 x^5 Cos[s]^2 + x^6 Cos[s]^3




Well, First Thank you very much, Jens! Second, I found there is something wrong with your statement "the HoldForm could be left out". I have tried on my mathematica 8, it turns out that the "HoldForm" is necessary . if "HoldForm" is not there, the order is still random in the output . And I tried to understand this as well as "rule" and "ruledelayed" stuff but can't figure it out. I have tried several input, each confused me. summarized as follows




  1. Replace[cx, List[x__] -> Plus[x]]


    will give


    Sequence[1, 3 x, x^2 (3 + 3 Cos[s]), x^3 (1 + 6 Cos[s]), x^4 (3 Cos[s] + 3 Cos[s]^2), 3 x^5 Cos[s]^2, x^6 Cos[s]^3] 

    But I suppose it should give the Plus result because


    Replace[cx, List[x__] -> jjj[x]]


    gives


    jjj[1, 3 x, x^2 (3 + 3 Cos[s]), x^3 (1 + 6 Cos[s]),  x^4 (3 Cos[s] + 3 Cos[s]^2), 3 x^5 Cos[s]^2, x^6 Cos[s]^3]


  2. Replace[cx, List[x__] -> HoldForm@Plus[x]] gives the right result


    1 + 3 x + x^2 (3 + 3 Cos[s]) + x^3 (1 + 6 Cos[s]) +  x^4 (3 Cos[s] + 3 Cos[s]^2) + 3 x^5 Cos[s]^2 + x^6 Cos[s]^3


  3. Replace[cx, List[x__] :> Plus[x]] gives


    1 + 3 x + 3 x^5 Cos[s]^2 + x^6 Cos[s]^3 + x^2 (3 + 3 Cos[s]) + x^3 (1 + 6 Cos[s]) + x^4 (3 Cos[s] + 3 Cos[s]^2)


    Although it gives the right plus result, the order is wrong.





Answer



Here is an approach that doesn't rely on undocumented features or on low-level box manipulations. We're dealing with a polynomial, so we can simply collect its coefficients and arrange them any way we like as follows:


c0 = Collect[(1 + x + Cos[s] x^2)^3, x];

cx = CoefficientList[c0, x] x^Range[0, Exponent[c0, x]]


(*
==> {1, 3 x, x^2 (3 + 3 Cos[s]), x^3 (1 + 6 Cos[s]),
x^4 (3 Cos[s] + 3 Cos[s]^2), 3 x^5 Cos[s]^2, x^6 Cos[s]^3}
*)

Replace[cx, List[x__] :> HoldForm[Plus[x]]]


$1+3 x+x^2 (3+3 \cos (s))+x^3 (1+6 \cos (s))+x^4 \left(3 \cos (s)+3 \cos ^2(s)\right)+3 x^5 \cos ^2(s)+x^6 \cos ^3(s)$




I've just assembled the desired form of the polynomial by creating a list cx of all terms up to the maximum power Exponent[c0, x], and then turning that list into a sum by means of Replace. Here, the HoldForm was put in so that the output now can be arranged in any alternative order by permuting (or, in particular, reversing) the list cx before doing the Replace:


Replace[Reverse@cx, List[x__] :> HoldForm[Plus[x]]]


$x^6 \cos ^3(s)+3 x^5 \cos ^2(s)+x^4 \left(3 \cos (s)+3 \cos ^2(s)\right)+x^3 (1+6 \cos (s))+x^2 (3+3 \cos (s))+3 x+1$



The output is in held form, so if you apply ReleaseHold to it the order will revert back to the first version. The HoldForm could also be exploited to do further cosmetic changes on the expression, such as putting coefficients before the power of x - but you didn't ask for that.


Edit In response to a follow-up question: the Replace command has RuleDelayed (:>) instead of -> in it because the pattern indicated by x__ has to be fed into the Plus only at the time when there is actually a list of terms present. E.g., if you use List[x__] -> Plus[x] then the right-hand side is immediately evaluated to give you x as the result of Plus[x] (assuming that x hasn't been defined globally). And when you then later encounter the Replace statement it will say to feed the pattern inside List into the right-hand side that now has the form x instead of Plus[x]. That will yield something with the head Sequence corresponding to the sequence of arguments inside the given List.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.