Skip to main content

plotting - Geodesics on a torus


Is it possible to draw geodesics between the points in a path on a torus - toroidal surface?


geodesics: generalization of the notion of a "straight line" to "curved spaces"


paths = {{{348.488, 132.622}, {336.333, 63.6857}, {394.365, 24.5422},
          {39.3603, 78.1653}, {109.094, 84.2662}, {170.317, 50.3295},
          {195.403, 115.68}, {263.324, 132.615}, {316.947, 177.61},
          {381.382, 150.259}, {49.8526, 164.812}, {41.3217, 95.3342},

          {11.7384, 158.776}, {65.3616, 113.781}, {5.35985, 77.728},
          {18.7165, 9.01408}, {358.715, 372.961}, {394.767, 312.96},
          {340.367, 268.907}, {313.016, 333.343}, {269.92, 388.503}}};

The plot has some problem because periodic boundary conditions (PBCs).


The plot has some problem because periodic boundary conditions (PBCs).



Answer



I don't know if there's a simple way to find geodesics on a torus, but I can give you a general way to find geodesics on any curved surface.


First, I define the torus:


r = 3;

torus[{u_, v_}] := {Cos[u]*(Sin[v] + r), Sin[u]*(Sin[v] + r), Cos[v]}

My initial attempt was then to use variational methods to derive a formula for geodesics:


Needs["VariationalMethods`"]
eq = EulerEquations[Sqrt[Total[D[torus[{u, v[u]}], u]^2]], v[u], u];

And use ParametricNDSolve & FindRoot to find the right parameters that connect the start and end point on the torus:


geodesic[{{u1_, v1_}, {u2_, v2_}}] := Module[{start, g, sol},
  If[u2 < u1, Return[geodesic[{{u2, v2}, {u1, v1}}]]];
  sol = ParametricNDSolve[Flatten[{

      eq, v[0] == v1, v'[0] == a
      }], v, {u, 0, u2 - u1}, {a}];
  start = a /. FindRoot[Evaluate[(v[a][u2 - u1] - v2 /. sol)], {a, 0}];
  g = v[start] /. sol;
  Function[t, {u1 + t*(u2 - u1), g[t*(u2 - u1)]}]
  ]

So given two points, geodesic will return a function that maps a number $0\leq t\leq 1$ to torus coordinates of the right geodesic:


LocatorPane[
 Dynamic[pts],

 Dynamic[ParametricPlot[Evaluate[geodesic[pts][t]], {t, 0, 1}, 
   PlotRange -> {{-π, π}, {-π, π}}, Axes -> True, 
   AspectRatio -> 1/r]]]

enter image description here


Show[
 ParametricPlot3D[
  torus[{u, v}], {u, -π, π}, {v, -π, π}, 
  PlotStyle -> White, ImageSize -> 500],
 ParametricPlot3D[Evaluate[torus[geodesic[pts][t]]], {t, 0, 1}, 

  PlotStyle -> Red]
 ]

enter image description here


Unfortunately, for some points, FindRoot becomes very slow or doesn't even find the right solution. (In that case, geodesic still returns a proper geodesic, it just doesn't end where you want it to end.)


So my second attempt uses unconstrained minimization, i.e. I optimize N "control points" along a path to get the shortest path, then interpolate between the control points:


Clear[geodesicFindMin]
geodesicFindMin[{p1_, p2_}, nPts_: 25] := 
 Module[{approximatePts, optimizeOffset, optimizeOffsets, direction, 
   normal, pathLength, optimalPath, interpolations, len, solution},

  direction = p2 - p1;
  normal = {{0, 1}, {-1, 0}}.direction;

  approximatePts = Join[
    {p1},
    Table[
     p1 + i*direction/(nPts + 1) + optimizeOffset[i]*normal, {i, 
      nPts}],
    {p2}];


  pathLength = Total[Norm /@ Differences[torus /@ approximatePts]];

  {len, solution} = 
   Quiet[FindMinimum[pathLength, 
     Table[{optimizeOffset[i], 0}, {i, nPts}]]];
  optimalPath = approximatePts /. solution;

  interpolations = 
   ListInterpolation[#, {{0, 1}}] & /@ Transpose[optimalPath];


  Function[t, #[t] & /@ interpolations]
  ]

Usage is the same as before, only this version works much smoother:


LocatorPane[
 Dynamic[pts],
 Dynamic[ParametricPlot[Evaluate[geodesicFindMin[pts][t]], {t, 0, 1}, 
   PlotRange -> {{-π, π}, {-2 π, 2 π}}, Axes -> True, 
   AspectRatio -> 2/r]]]


enter image description here


Show[
 ParametricPlot3D[
  torus[{u, v}], {u, -π, π}, {v, -π, π}, 
  PlotStyle -> Directive[White], ImageSize -> 500],
 ParametricPlot3D[Evaluate[torus[geodesicFindMin[pts][t]]], {t, 0, 1},
   PlotStyle -> Red]
 ]

enter image description here



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more