Skip to main content

equation solving - Archimedes' Scheme to find $pi$



Given an Archimedes' scheme


$$a_{n+1}=\frac{2a_nb_n}{a_n+b_n}$$ $$b_{n+1}=\sqrt{a_{n+1}b_n}$$


with initial values $a_0=2\sqrt{3},b_0=3.$


How do I prove using Mathematica that this converges to $\pi$?


My attemp is to use RSolve or RSolveValue. But my when I input


RSolve[{a[n + 1] == 2 a[n] b[n]/(a[n] + b[n]), 
b[n + 1] == Sqrt[a[n + 1] b[n]], a[0] == 2 Sqrt[3],
b[0] == 3}, {a[n], b[n]}, n]

It gives an output the same as input



RSolve[{a[1 + n] == (2 a[n] b[n])/(a[n] + b[n]), 
b[1 + n] == Sqrt[a[1 + n] b[n]], a[0] == 2 Sqrt[3],
b[0] == 3}, {a[n], b[n]}, n]

What is wrong here?



Answer



You should use RecurrenceTable:


N@RecurrenceTable[{a[n + 1] == 2 a[n] b[n]/(a[n] + b[n]), 
b[n + 1] == Sqrt[a[n + 1] b[n]], a[0] == 2 Sqrt[3],
b[0] == 3}, {a[n], b[n]}, {n, 1, 10}]

N@Pi

with result:



{{3.21539, 3.10583}, {3.15966, 3.13263}, {3.14609, 3.13935}, {3.14271, 3.14103}, {3.14187, 3.14145}, {3.14166, 3.14156}, {3.14161, 3.14158}, {3.1416, 3.14159}, {3.14159, 3.14159}, {3.14159, 3.14159}}


3.14159



You can also change the number of digit, with N[expr,n] (n is the desired number of digits). See documentation.


EDIT Following @RunnyKine suggestion:


RecurrenceTable[{a[n + 1] == 2. a[n] b[n]/(a[n] + b[n]), 

b[n + 1] == Sqrt[a[n + 1] b[n]], a[0] == 2. Sqrt[3.],
b[0] == 3.}, {a[n], b[n]}, {n, 1, 20}]

is much faster (on my laptop, AbsoluteTiming gives 0.5 sec for the first version and 0.01 for the second)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...