Skip to main content

equation solving - Archimedes' Scheme to find $pi$



Given an Archimedes' scheme


$$a_{n+1}=\frac{2a_nb_n}{a_n+b_n}$$ $$b_{n+1}=\sqrt{a_{n+1}b_n}$$


with initial values $a_0=2\sqrt{3},b_0=3.$


How do I prove using Mathematica that this converges to $\pi$?


My attemp is to use RSolve or RSolveValue. But my when I input


RSolve[{a[n + 1] == 2 a[n] b[n]/(a[n] + b[n]), 
  b[n + 1] == Sqrt[a[n + 1] b[n]], a[0] == 2 Sqrt[3], 
  b[0] == 3}, {a[n], b[n]}, n]

It gives an output the same as input



RSolve[{a[1 + n] == (2 a[n] b[n])/(a[n] + b[n]), 
  b[1 + n] == Sqrt[a[1 + n] b[n]], a[0] == 2 Sqrt[3], 
  b[0] == 3}, {a[n], b[n]}, n]

What is wrong here?



Answer



You should use RecurrenceTable:


N@RecurrenceTable[{a[n + 1] == 2 a[n] b[n]/(a[n] + b[n]), 
   b[n + 1] == Sqrt[a[n + 1] b[n]], a[0] == 2 Sqrt[3], 
   b[0] == 3}, {a[n], b[n]}, {n, 1, 10}]

N@Pi

with result:



{{3.21539, 3.10583}, {3.15966, 3.13263}, {3.14609, 3.13935}, {3.14271, 3.14103}, {3.14187, 3.14145}, {3.14166, 3.14156}, {3.14161, 3.14158}, {3.1416, 3.14159}, {3.14159, 3.14159}, {3.14159, 3.14159}}


3.14159



You can also change the number of digit, with N[expr,n] (n is the desired number of digits). See documentation.


EDIT Following @RunnyKine suggestion:


RecurrenceTable[{a[n + 1] == 2. a[n] b[n]/(a[n] + b[n]), 

  b[n + 1] == Sqrt[a[n + 1] b[n]], a[0] == 2. Sqrt[3.], 
  b[0] == 3.}, {a[n], b[n]}, {n, 1, 20}]

is much faster (on my laptop, AbsoluteTiming gives 0.5 sec for the first version and 0.01 for the second)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more