Skip to main content

probability or statistics - Finding distribution parameters of a gaussian mixture distribution


Short version: how to estimate the parameters of a mixture of multivariate normal distributions (i.e.: Gaussian mixture model)?




Long version.


I am trying to estimate the parameters of a mixture of multivariate Gaussian distribution.


I know how to do it for a single multivariate normal distribution:


dist = MultinormalDistribution[{0, 0}, {{1, 0}, {0, 1}}];
dataSet = RandomVariate[dist, 300];
estDist = EstimatedDistribution[dataSet, MultinormalDistribution[{m1, m2}, {s11, s12}, {s12, s22]}}]]


Plot[{PDF[dist, {x, 0}], PDF[estDist, {x, 0}]}, {x, -4, 4}, Filling -> Axis]
SmoothDensityHistogram[dataSet]
Plot3D[PDF[estDist, {x, y}], {x, -2, 2}, {y, -2, 2}]

Similarity of PDF at y=0, density of dataset and estimated density.


All fine and dandy. However, the same approach does not work for me with mixture distributions. In particular, I am interested in mixtures of Gaussian distribution (Gaussian Mixture Model).


I generate a sample dataset:


targetDist = MixtureDistribution[{1/3, 2/3}, {MultinormalDistribution[{0, 0}, {{1, 0}, {0, 1}}], MultinormalDistribution[{3, 3}, {{1, 0}, {0, 1}}]}];
dataSet = RandomVariate[targetDist, 500];

ListPlot[dataSet]
SmoothHistogram3D[dataSet]

Mixture of Gaussians


I try to find the estimated distribution with:


estimatedDist = EstimatedDistribution[dataSet,
MixtureDistribution[{w1, w2}, {
MultinormalDistribution[{m11, m12}, {{s111, s112}, {s112, s122}}],
MultinormalDistribution[{m21, m22}, {{s211, s212}, {s212, s222}}]
}]]


But the evaluation always fails with:


NMaximize::cvdiv: Failed to converge to a solution. The function may be unbounded. >>

For some reason, it works if, instead of using MultinormalDistribution I use BinormalDistribution with $\rho$=0.


I know how to estimate these parameters using the Expectation Maximization algorithm, but I was wondering if there is a Mathematica-friendly way to do it.




Edit.


Giving initial estimates of the parameters does not really improve much. Even when giving the exact parameters like this:


estimatedDist = EstimatedDistribution[dataSet, 

MixtureDistribution[
{w1, w2},
{MultinormalDistribution[{m11, m12}, {{s111, s112}, {s121, s122}}],
MultinormalDistribution[{m21, m22}, {{s211, s212}, {s221, s222}}]}],
{{w1, 1/3}, {w2, 2/3}, {m11, 0}, {m12, 0}, {s111, 1}, {s112, 0}, {s121, 0}, {s122, 1}, {m21, 3}, {m22, 3}, {s211, 1}, {s212, 0}, {s221, 0}, {s222, 1}}]

EstimatedDistribution seems to take much more time than what it would be reasonable (and, since the estimates are exact, "reasonable" means 0.1 sec).


After about 15 minutes of processing on a 3.3GHz Xeon, I got this error:


FindMaximum::eit: The algorithm does not converge to the tolerance of
4.806217383937354`*^-6 in 500 iterations. The best estimated solution,

with feasibility residual, KKT residual, or complementary residual of
{2.1536*10^-12,0.00200273,5.6281*10^-13}, is returned. >>

Then a popup message:


INTERNAL SELF-TEST ERROR: MLParseStream|c|297
Click here to find out if this problem is known, and to help improve
Mathematica by reporting it to Wolfram Research.

Answer



You need to make sure that the constraints on the parameters are satisfied. In this case, these are


1) The mixture weights sum to one. 2) The covariance matrices of the two bivariate normals need to be positive definite.



The first constraint can be guaranteed by specifying the weights as follows:


w1 = Exp[w]/(1 + Exp[w]);

where w is unconstrained.


The second constraint can be enforced by using the Cholesky Decomposition of the covariance matrices as below.


c1 = {{c111, 0}, {c112, c122}};

where c1 is a lower triangular matrix of unrestricted elements. The resulting covariance matrix is given by s1 below.


s1 = c1.Transpose[c1]


Out[9]= {{c111^2, c111 c112}, {c111 c112, c112^2 + c122^2}}

Similarly, we have for the other covariance,


s2 = c2.Transpose[c2];

Let the two mean vectors be


m1 = {m11, m12};

m2 = {m21, m22};


The mixture pdf can be written as


In[15]:= mixPDF = MixtureDistribution[{w1, 1 - w1}, 
{MultinormalDistribution[m1, s1],
MultinormalDistribution[m2, s2]
}
]

Out[15]= MixtureDistribution[{E^w/(1 + E^w),
1 - E^w/(1 + E^w)}, {MultinormalDistribution[{m11,
m12}, {{c111^2, c111 c112}, {c111 c112, c112^2 + c122^2}}],

MultinormalDistribution[{m21,
m22}, {{c211^2, c211 c212}, {c211 c212, c212^2 + c222^2}}]}]

Then one may get what you are looking for, depending upon starting values.. The first try here does not give the correct answer.


In[16]:= est1 = EstimatedDistribution[dataSet, mixPDF]

Out[16]= MixtureDistribution[{0.0172133,
0.982787}, {MultinormalDistribution[{1.37871,
0.821044}, {{4.88591, 1.35155}, {1.35155, 0.373881}}],
MultinormalDistribution[{1.91595,

1.88312}, {{3.0206, 2.01692}, {2.01692, 3.08025}}]}]

Specifying starting values helps.


In[17]:= est2 = 
EstimatedDistribution[dataSet,
mixPDF, {{m11, - 0.5}, {m12, 0.8}, {m21, 1.5}, {m22, 2.0}, {c111,
1.5}, {c112, 0.0}, {c122, 1.0}, {c211, 1.5}, {c212, 0.0}, {c222,
1.0}, {w, 0.2}}]

Out[17]= MixtureDistribution[{0.39772,

0.60228}, {MultinormalDistribution[{0.110727,
0.110757}, {{1.05393, 0.060291}, {0.060291, 1.07923}}],
MultinormalDistribution[{3.0927,
3.02315}, {{0.84418, -0.148054}, {-0.148054, 0.982491}}]}]

An alternative approach can use FindDistributionParameters as follows


In[18]:= 
est3 = FindDistributionParameters[dataSet,
mixPDF, {{m11, 0.0}, {m12, 0.0}, {m21, 2.5}, {m22, 3.0}, {c111,
1.5}, {c112, 0.0}, {c122, 1.0}, {c211, 1.5}, {c212, 0.0}, {c222,

1.0}, {w, 0.5}}]

Out[18]= {m11 -> 0.110727, m12 -> 0.110757, m21 -> 3.0927,
m22 -> 3.02315, c111 -> 1.02661, c112 -> 0.0587281, c122 -> 1.0372,
c211 -> 0.918792, c212 -> -0.16114, c222 -> 0.978021, w -> -0.414975}

The original parameters can be obtained as


In[19]:= {w1, 1 - w1, m1, s1, m2, s2} /. est3

Out[19]= {0.39772, 0.60228, {0.110727,

0.110757}, {{1.05393, 0.060291}, {0.060291, 1.07923}}, {3.0927,
3.02315}, {{0.84418, -0.148054}, {-0.148054, 0.982491}}}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...