Skip to main content

Interpolation function precision in multi dimentional case



I have this interpolation example


zzz = Interpolation[{
    {{1}, 2`100*Pi},
    {{2}, 3`100*Pi},
    {{3}, 4`100*Pi}
    }, InterpolationOrder -> 1];
zzz[2]
zzz[2.5]
zzz[2.5`100]


and I am getting these resilts


9.424777960769379715387930149838508652591508198125317462924833776923449218858626995884104476026351204

10.9956

10.99557428756427633461925184147826009469009289781287037341230607307735742200173149519812188869740974

first number as expected with 100 digits, second with only 4 digits, but if I add `100 to the argument I can get it with 100 digits as well.


Now I use multidimensional example


testData = {

   {{-2.*10^-6, 0, -18}, -1.00853429340956742965680093076966025423734590973983188199800080460508043197286933569747093680631648*10^6},
   {{-2.*10^-6, 0, -17}, 
    952504.61044236930112440429386078472672512393090882097358420180063200222870428099604804394164585046},
   {{-2.*10^-6, 1, -18}, -1.008544941816832295575440188033483155333800668013690157106923425838109768669333223372232072904210136*10^6},
   {{-2.*10^-6, 1, -17}, -952514.6672734985329986920711230513627204920640531655413765067694156739368659196153982113188871999717},

   {{-1.78947*10^-6, 0, -18}, -1.00854109353837536345550608172429712197251598047769246281925070613484574642246277456744911673832572*10^6},
   {{-1.78947*10^-6, 0, -17}, -952511.41057117723492310944481542159446029400164668155440545170216176754315387443491802212157785970},

   {{-1.78947*10^-6, 1, -18}, -1.008551741385092646935524440345434727928230066236270646432464156954808417875408736480254883876917917*10^6},

   {{-1.78947*10^-6, 1, -17}, -952521.4668417583449142805833940440259658101867440498419481296004930320450422321944211465035742782570}
   };
ff[x1_, x2_, x3_] = Interpolation[testData, InterpolationOrder -> 1][x1, x2, x3]

and for this example, I cannot get the results with 100 digits, even if I use exact existing values


ff[-2.0`100*10`100^-6, 0.0`100, -18.0`100]
ff[-2.0`100*10`100^-6, 1.0`100, -18.0`100]

Out[350]= -1.00853*10^6
Out[351]= -1.00854*10^6


How to force interpolation to use required precision? There is no WorkingPrecision argument for interpolation.


UPDATE 1


even if I put `100 everywhere like this, it is still the same result


testData = {
   {{-2`100*10^-6, 0.0`100, -18`100}, -1.00853429340956742965680093076966025423734590973983188199800080460508043197286933569747093680631648`100*10^6},
   {{-2`100*10^-6, 0.0`100, -17`100}, 952504.61044236930112440429386078472672512393090882097358420180063200222870428099604804394164585046`100},

   {{-2`100*10^-6, 1`100, -18`100}, -1.008544941816832295575440188033483155333800668013690157106923425838109768669333223372232072904210136`100*10^6},
   {{-2`100*10^-6, 1`100, -17`100}, -952514.6672734985329986920711230513627204920640531655413765067694156739368659196153982113188871999717`100},


   {{-1.78947`100*10^-6, 0.0`100, -18`100}, -1.00854109353837536345550608172429712197251598047769246281925070613484574642246277456744911673832572`100*10^6},
   {{-1.78947`100*10^-6, 0.`100, -17`100}, -952511.41057117723492310944481542159446029400164668155440545170216176754315387443491802212157785970`100},

   {{-1.78947`100*10^-6, 1`100, -18`100}, -1.008551741385092646935524440345434727928230066236270646432464156954808417875408736480254883876917917`100*10^6},
   {{-1.78947`100*10^-6, 1`100, -17`100}, -952521.4668417583449142805833940440259658101867440498419481296004930320450422321944211465035742782570`100}
};
ff[x1_, x2_, x3_] = 
 Interpolation[testData, InterpolationOrder -> 1][x1, x2, x3]

Answer




Evaluate 0.0`100 and you'll get a machine precision zero. Use the exact 0 instead:


fff = Interpolation[testData /. x_ /; x == 0 -> 0, InterpolationOrder -> 1];

fff[-2.`100.*^-6, 0, -18.`100.]
(*
-1.0085342934095674296568009307696602542373459097398318819980008046050\
804319728693356974709368063165*10^6
*)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more