Skip to main content

Same name for functions in package and Global context


I am using a package that was written for Mathematica 3 while I am now working on Mathematica 8. I have issues with 2 functions in particular, Order and GraphComplement. They are a part of this package but are also present in Mathematica 8 by default but with distinctly different arguments and working. (I am assuming they weren't around in Mathematica 3)


Now when I make use of some other functions in this package they make calls to both Order and GraphComplement and it keeps trying to use the in built wolfram version. I instead want it to use the one that comes with the package.


Can anyone point me to the right direction?



Answer



If I understand the problem I think I can help, but what I propose is a bit weird. I think you have a package that uses the unqualified Symbol name Order internally, and you need the package not to see the System`Order Symbol while it is defined. To effect this you can temporarily change the Context of Order, then put it back after loading the package.



As an example here is a bare-bones package defining a function foo that uses an internal definition for Order:


BeginPackage["MyStuff`"]

foo::usage = "my function";

Begin["`Private`"]

Order[args___] := {args} === Sort[{args}];

foo[a_, b_] := If[Order[a, b], "Arguments are in order", "Arguments are out of order"]


End[]

EndPackage[]

After saving this to foo.m if I call Get[foo.m] and try to use foo I have a problem:


Get["foo.m"]

foo[1, 2]



SetDelayed::write: Tag Order in Order[args___] is Protected. >>


If[1, "Arguments are in order", "Arguments are out of order"]

But if, after restarting the kernel, I first move Order out of the System context before loading the package:


Context[System`Order] = "hold`";

Get["foo.m"]

Context[hold`Order] = "System`";


I can now call my foo as intended:


foo[1, 2]
foo[4, 2]


"Arguments are in order"

"Arguments are out of order"


This works because while the package is being defined Order is not found in the context path, and a new Symbol MyStuff`Private`Order is created and defined instead:


Definition[foo]


foo[MyStuff`Private`a_, MyStuff`Private`b_] := 
If[MyStuff`Private`Order[MyStuff`Private`a, MyStuff`Private`b],
"Arguments are in order",
"Arguments are out of order"]

And Order still works elsewhere as its context is restored:



Order["a", "b"]


1

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....