Skip to main content

numerical integration - iteratively solve integral equation


Updated:


I am solving the following integral equation for $f(k)$


$$f(k)=-\iint d^2p\,d^2q\frac1{g(p)}\frac1{g(p-q)}\left(\frac 1{g(k-q)}-\frac1{g(-q)}\right)$$


where $g(k)=k^2+f(k)$


so the equation is


$$\small f(k)=-\iint d^2p\,d^2q\frac1{p^2+f(p)}\frac1{(p-q)^2+f(\vert p-q\vert)}\left(\frac 1{(k-q)^2+f(\vert k-q\vert)}-\frac1{q^2+f(q)}\right)$$


where $f(k)$ and $g(k)$ are isotropic functions in 2D.



Before I start numerically solving it, I am expecting that $f(k)$ is linearly increasing at small $k$ from $(0,0)$ and becomes constant for large $k$.


Here I tried to solve it iteratively, starting with the trial function $f(k)=1$:


f[k_] = 1;
g[k_] = k^2 + f[k];
iterstep := (values = Table[{k, NIntegrate[-p q/
g[p]/(p^2 + q^2 - 2 p q Cos[ϕp - ϕq] + f[Sqrt[ p^2 + q^2 - 2 p
q Cos[ϕp - ϕq] ]]) (1/(k^2 + q^2 - 2 k q Cos[ϕq] +
f[Sqrt[k^2 + q^2 - 2 k q Cos[ϕq]]])-1/g[q]), {p, 0, 50}, {q, 0,
50}, {ϕp, 0, 2 π}, {ϕq, 0, 2 π}, Method -> "QuasiMonteCarlo",
PrecisionGoal -> 4,]}, {k, 0, 50, 10}] ;

f1[k_]= InterpolatingPolynomial[values, k];
f[x_] = Piecewise[{{f1[x], x < 50}, {f1[50], x > 50}}]
g[k_] = k^2 + f[k];)
plot := Show[Plot[f[k], {k, 0, 50}, PlotRange -> All], ListPlot[values]];

I do the integral from 0 to a cutoff 50 and evaluate $f(k)$ at 5 points form 0 to 50 then do a fit to get new function $f(k)$ for next step.


after 1st step:


iterstep
values
plot


enter image description here


2nd step


enter image description here


3rd step


enter image description here


4th step


enter image description here


The major problem now: iteration is not contractive. Jump between high slope to low slope to even higher and even lower. How to change the program? Another better method?


The minor problem: I want to improve numerical integral accuracy. I have been asking about related numerical integral before: Multidimensional NIntegral with singularity. Some good advices were given.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.