Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Check homework integration in Mathematica



Given in my homework I have to compute (by hand) ∬ My solution so far: Let f(x,y)=x^2+y^2 and K=\{(x,y)\in\mathbb{R}^2:x^2+y^2\leq 1\}. With the transformation of polar coordinates \varphi:(r,\phi)\mapsto(r\cdot\cos\phi,r\cdot\sin\phi)=(x,y) and the determinant of the Jacobian matrix |\det D_\varphi|=r we can rewrite the set as K=\{(r\cdot\cos\phi,r\cdot\sin\phi):r\in[0,1],\phi\in[0,2\pi]\} and our integrand too as f(x,y)=x^2+y^2=r^2. \iint\limits_K f(x,y)\,\mathrm dx\,\mathrm dy=\int\limits_0^1\int\limits_0^{2\pi}r^2\cdot |\det D_\varphi|\,\mathrm d\phi\,\mathrm dr=2\pi\int\limits_0^1r^3\,\mathrm dr=\left.2\pi\cdot\frac{1}{4}r^4\right|_0^1=\frac{\pi}{2}.


I now want to check the result with a CAS. I am pretty new to Mathematica so I just didn't found any clue on how to enter such an integral for computation. Any help out there?



Answer



In Mathematica:


Integrate[Integrate[x^2 + y^2, {x, -Sqrt[1 - y^2], Sqrt[1 - y^2]}], {y, -1, 1}]

Or, shorter:


Integrate[x^2 + y^2, {y, -1, 1}, {x, -Sqrt[1 - y^2], Sqrt[1 - y^2]}]

The main trick is to calculate the bound on x based on the current value of y, which is what you need to make the integration bounds explicit. Indeed, x_{max}=\sqrt{1-y^2}. This is something you can do in most integral-calculating math software.


You can also define the region implicitly, see this.


For this specific problem, that would give:



Integrate[(x^2 + y^2) Boole[x^2 + y^2 <= 1], {y, -100, 100}, {x, -100, 100}]

Where the "100" bounds are just to limit the computation. However, Mathematica is even smart enough to calculate:


Integrate[(x^2 + y^2) Boole[x^2 + y^2 <= 1], {y, -Infinity, 
Infinity}, {x, -Infinity, Infinity}]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...