Skip to main content

workbench - MUnit creating a hierarchy of TestSuites


I would like to create a hierarchy of TestSuites. However it appears that it is not possible to call a TestSuite from another TestSuite. So before I go and reinvent the wheel, I thought I would see how others have done (or would) accomplish this.



Details of what I am trying to accomplish


I have grouped packages (and their tests) that perform like functionality by directory. For illustrative purposes lets say I have three subdirectories: importers, manipulators, and processes. I have a TestSuite in each subdirectory named TestAll.mt . I also have one in the top level directory called TestAll.mt that I would like to have call the TestAll.mt in the three subdirectories.



I would like to be able to run the test suites at both the subdirectory and top levels. Running the test suite at the subdirectory level would only run the particular subset of tests, while running the test suite at the top level would run the test suites in all the subdirectories.


I would like to avoid having to add an entry for a particular test to both the subdirectory and top level test suites.


A bonus would be if the top level test suite auto discovered the test suites in the subdirectories (not having to specify the subdirectories in the root test suite), but that is not crucial.


Update



Attempt #1 -- Make a list of .mt files in each of the sub TestAll.mt s. If the top level TestAll.mt is called, the sub levels' lists would be appended to the top level's list and then that list would be supplied to TestSuite. If a sub level's TestAll.mt is called, its list would be supplied as the argument to TestSuite.


Result: Failure


From Workbench, adding any expression to a .mt that contains TestSuite appears to cause none of the tests to run.


x=1;
TestSuite[

    {
        "Test1.mt",
        "Test2.mt"
    }
]

From a notebook, TestSuite shows up in command completion, but does not show up in the MUnit package usage info. Executing the following:


TestSuite[
 {
  "/pathToTests/Test1.mt",

  "/pathToTests/Test2.mt"
  }
 ]

Results in:


TestSuite[{"/pathToTests/Test1.mt", "/pathToTests/Test2.mt"}]

Searched the MUnit package files for TestSuite, no hits.


cd "/Applications/Wolfram Workbench.app/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/214/1/.cp/MathematicaSourceVersioned/Head/MUnit"
find . -name "*.m" -print -exec grep TestSuite {} \;



Attempt #2 -- Roll my own TestSuite ...




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?
Post a Comment
Read more

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...
Post a Comment
Read more