Skip to main content

Solving a system of linear equations modulo n


I have a system of linear equations


$$ a+b+c \equiv 31 \pmod{54} $$ $$ 4a+2b+c \equiv 3 \pmod{54} $$ $$ 9a+3b+c \equiv 11 \pmod{54} $$


What should I input (I'm using LinearSolve)? It doesn't seem to work for composite modulo numbers. I have been unable to get Mathematica to give me all the possible solutions.



Answer



Working with LinearSolve we encounter some inconsistency of the related option Modulus -> z if z is not prime. Nonetheless we could do this


Mod[ LinearSolve[ {{1, 1, 1}, {4, 2, 1}, {9, 3, 1}}, {31, 3, 11}], 54]


{18, 26, 41}


Unfortunately we can get only one solution unlike when working with Solve. These posts describe another problems or bugs related to Modulus or Mod:


Solving/Reducing equations in Z/pZ
Strange behaviour of Reduce for Mod[x,1]


Note that the latter points some bugs present in versions 7 and 8 which have been fixed in version 9 of Mathematica.


Even though LinearSolve doesn't appear to be an appropriate approach w can use the Modulus option in another equation-solving functionality like e.g.: Solve or Reduce and in some other functions related to algebraic manipulations. This yields a symbolic result:


Solve[{  a + b + c   == 31, 
4 a + 2 b + c == 3,
9 a + 3 b + c == 11}, {a, b, c}, Modulus -> 54]



{{a -> 18 + 27 C[1], b -> 26 + 27 C[1], c -> 41}}

To get a full list of solutions we should put the result in a table, (changing generated parameters since they are protected to another ones e.g. k). We can see that we need the table of length two only otherwise we would get may duplicates.


Table[ Mod[{a, b, c} /. %, 54] /. C[1] -> k, {k, 2}]


{{{45, 53, 41}}, {{18, 26, 41}}}

These are all solutions of the related system $\mod 54$:



Apply[{ Mod[#1 + #2 + #3, 54] - 31, 
Mod[4 #1 + 2 #2 + #3, 54] - 3,
Mod[9 #1 + 3 #2 + #3, 54] - 11}&, %, {2}]


  {{{0, 0, 0}}, {{0, 0, 0}}}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...