Skip to main content

Solving a system of linear equations modulo n


I have a system of linear equations


$$ a+b+c \equiv 31 \pmod{54} $$ $$ 4a+2b+c \equiv 3 \pmod{54} $$ $$ 9a+3b+c \equiv 11 \pmod{54} $$


What should I input (I'm using LinearSolve)? It doesn't seem to work for composite modulo numbers. I have been unable to get Mathematica to give me all the possible solutions.



Answer



Working with LinearSolve we encounter some inconsistency of the related option Modulus -> z if z is not prime. Nonetheless we could do this


Mod[ LinearSolve[ {{1, 1, 1}, {4, 2, 1}, {9, 3, 1}}, {31, 3, 11}], 54]


{18, 26, 41}


Unfortunately we can get only one solution unlike when working with Solve. These posts describe another problems or bugs related to Modulus or Mod:


Solving/Reducing equations in Z/pZ
Strange behaviour of Reduce for Mod[x,1]


Note that the latter points some bugs present in versions 7 and 8 which have been fixed in version 9 of Mathematica.


Even though LinearSolve doesn't appear to be an appropriate approach w can use the Modulus option in another equation-solving functionality like e.g.: Solve or Reduce and in some other functions related to algebraic manipulations. This yields a symbolic result:


Solve[{  a + b + c   == 31, 
4 a + 2 b + c == 3,
9 a + 3 b + c == 11}, {a, b, c}, Modulus -> 54]



{{a -> 18 + 27 C[1], b -> 26 + 27 C[1], c -> 41}}

To get a full list of solutions we should put the result in a table, (changing generated parameters since they are protected to another ones e.g. k). We can see that we need the table of length two only otherwise we would get may duplicates.


Table[ Mod[{a, b, c} /. %, 54] /. C[1] -> k, {k, 2}]


{{{45, 53, 41}}, {{18, 26, 41}}}

These are all solutions of the related system $\mod 54$:



Apply[{ Mod[#1 + #2 + #3, 54] - 31, 
Mod[4 #1 + 2 #2 + #3, 54] - 3,
Mod[9 #1 + 3 #2 + #3, 54] - 11}&, %, {2}]


  {{{0, 0, 0}}, {{0, 0, 0}}}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.