Skip to main content

Solving a system of linear equations modulo n


I have a system of linear equations


a+b+c≡31(mod54)

4a+2b+c≡3(mod54)
9a+3b+c≡11(mod54)


What should I input (I'm using LinearSolve)? It doesn't seem to work for composite modulo numbers. I have been unable to get Mathematica to give me all the possible solutions.



Answer



Working with LinearSolve we encounter some inconsistency of the related option Modulus -> z if z is not prime. Nonetheless we could do this


Mod[ LinearSolve[ {{1, 1, 1}, {4, 2, 1}, {9, 3, 1}}, {31, 3, 11}], 54]


{18, 26, 41}


Unfortunately we can get only one solution unlike when working with Solve. These posts describe another problems or bugs related to Modulus or Mod:


Solving/Reducing equations in Z/pZ
Strange behaviour of Reduce for Mod[x,1]


Note that the latter points some bugs present in versions 7 and 8 which have been fixed in version 9 of Mathematica.


Even though LinearSolve doesn't appear to be an appropriate approach w can use the Modulus option in another equation-solving functionality like e.g.: Solve or Reduce and in some other functions related to algebraic manipulations. This yields a symbolic result:


Solve[{  a + b + c   == 31, 
4 a + 2 b + c == 3,
9 a + 3 b + c == 11}, {a, b, c}, Modulus -> 54]



{{a -> 18 + 27 C[1], b -> 26 + 27 C[1], c -> 41}}

To get a full list of solutions we should put the result in a table, (changing generated parameters since they are protected to another ones e.g. k). We can see that we need the table of length two only otherwise we would get may duplicates.


Table[ Mod[{a, b, c} /. %, 54] /. C[1] -> k, {k, 2}]


{{{45, 53, 41}}, {{18, 26, 41}}}

These are all solutions of the related system mod54:



Apply[{ Mod[#1 + #2 + #3, 54] - 31, 
Mod[4 #1 + 2 #2 + #3, 54] - 3,
Mod[9 #1 + 3 #2 + #3, 54] - 11}&, %, {2}]


  {{{0, 0, 0}}, {{0, 0, 0}}}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...