Skip to main content

numerical integration - Maximize a definite integral with constraints on the limits


I would like to maximize the following definite double integral with respect to $0:


∫d1−r0∫sd+rx−xr[(1−r)x+ry−d]dydx


under the constraints: 0≤d≤1, 2d<s≤4, 0<r<12, 0≤x≤s, 0≤y≤s.


Note that the variables of integration, i.e. x and y, are both bounded by 0 and s; for this reason, I have to be careful in my code regarding the limits of integration regions.


Here is my code:


maxR = Flatten[Table[{d, s, r /. Last@Maximize[{Integrate[(1 - r)*x + r*y - d, {x, 0, Min[s, d/(1 - r)]}, {y, Max[0, Min[s, (d + r*x - x)/r]], s}], 0 <= d <= 1, 2 d < s, 0 < r < 1/2}, {r}]}, {d, 0, 1, .1}, {s, 1, 4, .1}], 1];

ListPlot3D[maxR, PlotRange -> {0, 1}, AxesLabel -> {"d", "s", "r"}]

And this is running forever. Can anyone help please?


By the way, this is an extension of Ulich's answer to this question. While the latter shows how to get the solution of the integral, my question here regards a maximization of the integral.



Answer



With Integrate[...] substituded by the result from question 202534


int[s_?NumericQ, d_?NumericQ, r_?NumericQ] :=NIntegrate[(1 - r)*x + r*y - d, {x, 0, Min[s, d/(1 - r)]}, {y,Max[0, Min[s, (d + r*x - x)/r]], s}]

the solution can be obtained numerically:


Table[NMaximize[{int[s, d, r], 0 < r < 1/2}, { r}], {d, 0,1, .1}, {s, 1, 4, .1 }]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...