Skip to main content

Why does a variable become real when using the second argument of Dynamic?


Version 9, on Windows 7.


Please compare these 2 very simple examples


Manipulate[
x,
Row[{Manipulator[Dynamic[x], {0, 10, 1/100}]}],

{{x, 1}, None}
]

and


Manipulate[
x,
Row[{Manipulator[Dynamic[x, (x = #) &], {0, 10, 1/100}]}],
{{x, 1}, None}
]


Would you not expect them to work the same way?


But in the second case, x becomes real, while in the first case it remains rational as expected.


enter image description here


Any one knows the reasoning for this? I read about the second argument of Dynamic, but do not see something obvious. I did not read everything about it. But the above behaviour is surprising.


The fix is easy:


Manipulate[
x,
Row[{Manipulator[
Dynamic[x, (x = Rationalize[#]) &], {0, 10, 1/100}]}],
{{x, 1}, None}

]

I am only asking why it happens, so I can learn more.



Answer



This is not an answer but it's too long for a comment. Also please remember that all the following are just guesses.


My first observation is that the simplified


Slider[Dynamic[x, (x=#)&], {0, 1, 1/10}]

can reproduce the problem.


We know that some variables (in particular DynamicModule variables) are owned by the Front End, not the Kernel, and can be directly set using GUI elements (such as Slider) without needing any kernel interaction. It is reasonable to assume that the Front End is only able to do computations with machine level data types like integers and reals, but not arbitrary precision numbers or Rationals. Why this might have an effect in this particular example, I do not know.



But let us take a look at what sort of box forms (which are handled by the front end) are generated for different variations of Slider:


1. First, the basic Dynamic with a Real step size:


Slider[Dynamic[x], {0, 1, 0.1}]

Cell[BoxData[
SliderBox[Dynamic[$CellContext`x], {0, 1, 0.1}]], "Output"]

This is a simple box form that maps to the input expression directly.


2. Now let's try a Rational step size:


Slider[Dynamic[x], {0, 1, 1/10}]


Cell[BoxData[
SliderBox[Dynamic[
BoxForm`RemapVariable[$CellContext`x, {0, 1, Rational[1, 10]}],
BoxForm`RemapValue[#, $CellContext`x, {0, 1, Rational[1, 10]}]& ],
{0, 10, 1}]], "Output"
]

Here I see something new (and to me unfamiliar): RemapValue and RemapVariable. Is this maybe used to ask the kernel to do computations? The slider range and step size are now all integers and are remapped using a (possibly kernel evaluated function) to rationals.


3. Let's try Dynamic with a second argument and a Rational step size:



Slider[Dynamic[x, (x = #) &], {0, 1, 1/10}]

Cell[BoxData[
SliderBox[Dynamic[$CellContext`x, ($CellContext`x = #)& ], {0, 1, Rational[1, 10]}]],
"Output"]

The RemapValue is gone now!




Can we add the second argument of Dynamic back to the RemapValue version of the box form? Note that Dynamic already has two arguments there, so it should be grafted onto the RemapValue function somehow.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...