Skip to main content

Front End options


Inspired by a recent question and others like it, and not finding an existing duplicate, I ask:





  • What is the hierarchy of Front End options?




  • How do they work?




  • How can their values be set and recalled?





Answer




Option hierarchy


Quoting John Fultz:



Options work on an inheritance model. ... It all starts someplace. That would be the hard-coded option values in the front end C code. The root of the inheritance of options. Then one typically thinks of $FrontEnd as being the next level down, but there's another level in between. That is $DefaultFrontEnd. So, at the global level, it's -> $DefaultFrontEnd -> $FrontEnd -> $FrontEndSession. But only values set to $FrontEnd get written to your preferences file.



In addition to these global settings many Front End options (or their equivalents) can be set at the Notebook level, with e.g. EvaluationNotebook[], and these, when set, take local priority.


Settings made to the Notebook are saved in the Notebook (.nb). Settings made to $FrontEnd are saved in:


FileNameJoin[{$UserBaseDirectory, "FrontEnd", "init.m"}]

Settings to either $FrontEndSession or $DefaultFrontEnd do not persist between sessions. Settings made to $FrontEndSession override those to $FrontEnd for the duration of the session, while $DefaultFrontEnd are only used if the same option is specified nowhere else.



Setting and recalling option values


$FrontEnd and Notebook options can be set and cleared using the Option Inspector with the menu selections Global Preferences and Selected Notebook respectively. To clear an option click the x next to its option name:


enter image description here


Options can be set and recalled at all levels with SetOptions and Options.
For example one could make the following settings:


SetOptions[$DefaultFrontEnd,     FontColor -> Red    ]

SetOptions[$FrontEnd,            FontColor -> Orange ]

SetOptions[$FrontEndSession,     FontColor -> Magenta]


SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook[], FontColor -> Blue   ]

Many options are aslo accessible and configurable through CurrentValue. An unqualified CurrentValue will show the value lowest in the hierarchy (with the highest priority):


CurrentValue[FontColor] // InputForm


RGBColor[0, 0, 1]  (* blue *)

A qualified CurrentValue will show the other settings as well:



CurrentValue[#, FontColor] & /@
  {$DefaultFrontEnd, $FrontEnd, $FrontEndSession} // InputForm


{RGBColor[1, 0, 0],    (* red     *)
 RGBColor[1, 0.5, 0],  (* orange  *)
 RGBColor[1, 0, 1]}    (* magenta *)

The qualified form may be used to set option values:


CurrentValue[EvaluationNotebook[], FontColor] = Green;


If the Notebook option is cleared through the Option Inspector, or a new Notebook is opened, the next setting up the hierarchy is used:


CurrentValue[FontColor] // InputForm


RGBColor[1, 0, 1]

After Mathematica is restarted the $FrontEnd setting persists:


CurrentValue[FontColor] // InputForm



RGBColor[1, 0.5, 0]


As David Creech noted in a comment it is possible to use Inherited as an option value to un-set that option and revert to the next higher level of the hierarchy. Example:


SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook[], FontColor -> Blue]

Options[EvaluationNotebook[]]



{FontColor -> RGBColor[0, 0, 1], FrontEndVersion -> . . .}



SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook[], FontColor -> Inherited]

Options[EvaluationNotebook[]]


{FrontEndVersion -> "10.1 for Microsoft Windows . . .}



Note that the Option has been entirely removed from the Notebook options list.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...
Post a Comment
Read more

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...
Post a Comment
Read more