Skip to main content

evaluation - Get the current iteration count


I would like to be able to get the current iteration count, the one that if exceeds $IterationLimit makes the evaluation stop.


After not finding a magical variable that stores this value, or a magical built-in that retrieves it, I thought about TraceScan.



According to the documentation of $IterationLimit,



$IterationLimit gives an upper limit on the length of any list that can be generated by Trace

However, a quick test shows that this is not so simple. Let's define


ClearAll[f]
f[i_] := f[i - 1]
f[0] := "Yeah"

Now,



Block[{$IterationLimit = 20},
 Trace[f[18]] // Length//Print;
 Trace[f[18], TraceDepth -> 1] // Length//Print;
 f[18]
 ]

prints 56 and 38 respectively, while f[18]'s evaluation finishes successfully.


Looking at the output of the last trace, we see that the before and after argument evaluation are being traced. So,


Trace[f[3], TraceDepth -> 1]   
(* {f[3],f[3-1],f[2],f[2-1],f[1],f[1-1],f[0],Yeah} *)


Notice that the "two outputs per iteration" rule doesn't hold if we add a definition like f[3]=f[1], in which case


Trace[f[5], TraceDepth -> 1]
(* {f[5],f[5-1],f[4],f[4-1],f[3],f[1],f[1-1],f[0],Yeah} *)

If this happened, a hacky workround could exist along the lines of


SetAttributes[trackIterations, HoldFirst];
trackIterations[code_] := Block[{iterationCounter = 0},
  TraceScan[iterationCounter += 1/2, code, TraceDepth -> 1]
  ]


Question


How can I get that counter, or alternatively, how can I make Trace only trace once each iteration?




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more