Skip to main content

performance tuning - Radial distribution function


I have tried to rewrite my old IDL code to calculate the radial correlation function for a regular 2D crystal structure.


The theory behind this function is given here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radial_distribution_function


Update 1:



The radial density distribution counts the number of points in a distance between $r$ and $r +\Delta r$ from each considered central point (below one marked as red). The area of such a "shell" is $2\pi r \Delta r$. The density distributions are averaged for all center points and then normalized by the total point density times the ring area for each radius.




enter image description here


Update 2:



It is important that the maximum radius (the maximum shell) for each center point does not cross the edges of the available point coordiantes (corresponding to the range defined by the smallest and largest x and y point value). That means that a point close to the edges has a maller maximum radius (smallest distance to the next edge) than a center point (for a square: maximum radius = half of the diagonal).



My question: is it possible to improve my "unreadable" and slow code, which does not use any special mathematica functions?.


Also I must have made a normalization error, since the function does not converge at g(r)=1 (see plot below).


As input I have taken a crystal image recorded with a high resolution camera:


enter image description here


Dr. belisarius has detected all coordinates by the following one-liner:



pts = ComponentMeasurements[Binarize@ImageSubtract
[image, BilateralFilter[image, 4, 1]], "Centroid"];

These points pts I have used to determine the radial correlation function.


The resulting plot is:


enter image description here


The full code is given here:


Clear[radialDensityDistribution];
radialDensityDistribution [listData_, mrr_: 0, mrc_: dDiag,
subdivision_: 50] :=

(
(*listData: list of 2D data points*)
(*mrr: distance from edge*)
(*mrc: calculation radius from central point*)
(*subdivision: number of in size's from mean point distance*)

n = Length[listData];

x = listData[[All, 1]];
y = listData[[All, 2]];


minCorner = {Min[x], Min[y]};
maxCorner = {Max[x], Max[y]};

diag = maxCorner - minCorner;
dDiag = Sqrt[diag.diag];

area = diag[[1]]*diag[[2]];

pointDensity = n/area;


deltaR = (area/n)^(1.0/2);
dr = deltaR/subdivision;

maxShell = Floor[mrc/dr];

g = Array[0 &, maxShell];
centralPoint = Array[0 &, n];

com = {Mean[x], Mean[y]};

radii = Sqrt[(x - com[[1]])^2 + (y - com[[2]])^2];
maxrad = Max[radii] // N;

centralIndex = Flatten@Position[radii + mrr, n_ /; n <= maxrad];
nCentral = Length[centralIndex];

p = {x[[centralIndex]], y[[centralIndex]]};

g = 0;


Table[
dist = {p[[1, 2 ;; All]] - p[[1, i]],
p[[2, 2 ;; All]] - p[[2, i]]}[[All, i ;; All]];
shell =
Floor[Sqrt[
dist[[1, All]]*dist[[1, All]] + dist[[2, All]]*dist[[2, All]]]/
dr];
h = HistogramList[shell, {0, maxShell - 1, 1}][[2, All]];
g = h + g,
{i, 1, nCentral - 1}

];

Table[
areaShell = Pi*(((shell + 1.0)*dr)^2 - (shell*dr)^2);
g[[shell]] = g[[shell]]/(1.0*nCentral*areaShell*pointDensity),
{shell, 1, maxShell - 1}
];

rn = (Range[maxShell - 1] - 0.5)*dr;
{g, rn, deltaR}

)

image = Import["http://i.stack.imgur.com/czhuI.png"];

pts = ComponentMeasurements[
Binarize@ImageSubtract[image, BilateralFilter[image, 4, 1]],
"Centroid"][[All, 2]];

extx = Max[pts[[All, 1]]] - Min[pts[[All, 1]]];
exty = Max[pts[[All, 2]]] - Min[pts[[All, 2]]];

ext = Min[extx, exty];

{g, rn, deltaR} = radialDensityDistribution [pts, ext/4, ext/4, 20];

ListLinePlot[Transpose[{rn, g}], PlotRange -> Full, Frame -> True,
FrameLabel -> {{"g(r)", ""}, {"r (pixels)", ""}}, ImageSize -> Large]

Answer



I will show a simple and fast approach to computing the pair correlation function (radial distribution function) for a 2D system of point particles.:


radialDistributionFunction2D[pts_?MatrixQ, boxLength_Real, nBins_: 350] :=
Module[{gr, r, binWidth = boxLength/(2 nBins), npts = Length@pts, rho},

rho = npts/boxLength^2; (* area number density *)
{r, gr} = HistogramList[(*compute and bin the distances between points of interest*)
Flatten @ DistanceMatrix @ pts, {0.005, boxLength/4., binWidth}];
r = MovingMedian[r, 2]; (* take center of each bin as r *)
gr = gr/(2 Pi r rho binWidth npts); (* normaliza g(r) *)
Transpose[{r, gr}] (* combine r and g(r) *)
]

Here is how you use it:


rdf = radialDistributionFunction2D[pts, 1023.];

ListLinePlot[rdf, PlotRange ->{{0, 150}, All}, Mesh -> 80]

Mathematica graphics


Notice that you get the correct normalization for free. This took about 1.2 seconds on my machine. I have restricted the plot range to show the interesting features.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.