Skip to main content

performance tuning - Radial distribution function


I have tried to rewrite my old IDL code to calculate the radial correlation function for a regular 2D crystal structure.


The theory behind this function is given here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radial_distribution_function


Update 1:



The radial density distribution counts the number of points in a distance between $r$ and $r +\Delta r$ from each considered central point (below one marked as red). The area of such a "shell" is $2\pi r \Delta r$. The density distributions are averaged for all center points and then normalized by the total point density times the ring area for each radius.




enter image description here


Update 2:



It is important that the maximum radius (the maximum shell) for each center point does not cross the edges of the available point coordiantes (corresponding to the range defined by the smallest and largest x and y point value). That means that a point close to the edges has a maller maximum radius (smallest distance to the next edge) than a center point (for a square: maximum radius = half of the diagonal).



My question: is it possible to improve my "unreadable" and slow code, which does not use any special mathematica functions?.


Also I must have made a normalization error, since the function does not converge at g(r)=1 (see plot below).


As input I have taken a crystal image recorded with a high resolution camera:


enter image description here


Dr. belisarius has detected all coordinates by the following one-liner:



pts = ComponentMeasurements[Binarize@ImageSubtract
[image, BilateralFilter[image, 4, 1]], "Centroid"];

These points pts I have used to determine the radial correlation function.


The resulting plot is:


enter image description here


The full code is given here:


Clear[radialDensityDistribution];
radialDensityDistribution [listData_, mrr_: 0, mrc_: dDiag,
subdivision_: 50] :=

(
(*listData: list of 2D data points*)
(*mrr: distance from edge*)
(*mrc: calculation radius from central point*)
(*subdivision: number of in size's from mean point distance*)

n = Length[listData];

x = listData[[All, 1]];
y = listData[[All, 2]];


minCorner = {Min[x], Min[y]};
maxCorner = {Max[x], Max[y]};

diag = maxCorner - minCorner;
dDiag = Sqrt[diag.diag];

area = diag[[1]]*diag[[2]];

pointDensity = n/area;


deltaR = (area/n)^(1.0/2);
dr = deltaR/subdivision;

maxShell = Floor[mrc/dr];

g = Array[0 &, maxShell];
centralPoint = Array[0 &, n];

com = {Mean[x], Mean[y]};

radii = Sqrt[(x - com[[1]])^2 + (y - com[[2]])^2];
maxrad = Max[radii] // N;

centralIndex = Flatten@Position[radii + mrr, n_ /; n <= maxrad];
nCentral = Length[centralIndex];

p = {x[[centralIndex]], y[[centralIndex]]};

g = 0;


Table[
dist = {p[[1, 2 ;; All]] - p[[1, i]],
p[[2, 2 ;; All]] - p[[2, i]]}[[All, i ;; All]];
shell =
Floor[Sqrt[
dist[[1, All]]*dist[[1, All]] + dist[[2, All]]*dist[[2, All]]]/
dr];
h = HistogramList[shell, {0, maxShell - 1, 1}][[2, All]];
g = h + g,
{i, 1, nCentral - 1}

];

Table[
areaShell = Pi*(((shell + 1.0)*dr)^2 - (shell*dr)^2);
g[[shell]] = g[[shell]]/(1.0*nCentral*areaShell*pointDensity),
{shell, 1, maxShell - 1}
];

rn = (Range[maxShell - 1] - 0.5)*dr;
{g, rn, deltaR}

)

image = Import["http://i.stack.imgur.com/czhuI.png"];

pts = ComponentMeasurements[
Binarize@ImageSubtract[image, BilateralFilter[image, 4, 1]],
"Centroid"][[All, 2]];

extx = Max[pts[[All, 1]]] - Min[pts[[All, 1]]];
exty = Max[pts[[All, 2]]] - Min[pts[[All, 2]]];

ext = Min[extx, exty];

{g, rn, deltaR} = radialDensityDistribution [pts, ext/4, ext/4, 20];

ListLinePlot[Transpose[{rn, g}], PlotRange -> Full, Frame -> True,
FrameLabel -> {{"g(r)", ""}, {"r (pixels)", ""}}, ImageSize -> Large]

Answer



I will show a simple and fast approach to computing the pair correlation function (radial distribution function) for a 2D system of point particles.:


radialDistributionFunction2D[pts_?MatrixQ, boxLength_Real, nBins_: 350] :=
Module[{gr, r, binWidth = boxLength/(2 nBins), npts = Length@pts, rho},

rho = npts/boxLength^2; (* area number density *)
{r, gr} = HistogramList[(*compute and bin the distances between points of interest*)
Flatten @ DistanceMatrix @ pts, {0.005, boxLength/4., binWidth}];
r = MovingMedian[r, 2]; (* take center of each bin as r *)
gr = gr/(2 Pi r rho binWidth npts); (* normaliza g(r) *)
Transpose[{r, gr}] (* combine r and g(r) *)
]

Here is how you use it:


rdf = radialDistributionFunction2D[pts, 1023.];

ListLinePlot[rdf, PlotRange ->{{0, 150}, All}, Mesh -> 80]

Mathematica graphics


Notice that you get the correct normalization for free. This took about 1.2 seconds on my machine. I have restricted the plot range to show the interesting features.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...