Skip to main content

dynamic - InputField does not always update continuously with ContinuousAction


By fiddling with Vitaliy's solution for a small GUI, I've come accross this particular behaviour of InputField:


y = Null;
{InputField[Dynamic[y], String, ContinuousAction -> True],
InputField[Dynamic[y], Boxes, ContinuousAction -> True],
InputField[Dynamic[y], Expression, ContinuousAction -> True],
Dynamic@y}


While the first two fields update correctly as the user interacts with them (updating withouth hitting Enter or clicking outside of the InputField), the third one does not.


Furthermore:


y = Null; x = False;
Column@{
InputField[Dynamic[y, (y = #; x = (# === "123")) &], String, ContinuousAction -> True],
InputField[Dynamic[y, (y = #; x = (# === 123)) &], Boxes, ContinuousAction -> True],
Dynamic@x
}

Typing 123 into the first field immediately yields True, but the same action with the second field does not work.



Is it a bug or am I missing something?



Answer



I wouldn't call it a bug, and is in fact, the expected behaviour (at least, I expect it). Look at it this way — when you input a String or a Number, Mathematica doesn't need to interpret it/evaluate it and can readily display the value dynamically.


On the other hand, with an Expression, it needs to know that you have finished entering the expression and it can be evaluated now. Consider what would've happened if this were not the case (each uncommented line below is a successive keystroke in in the InputField, and the commented lines the expected (pseudo)output if it were evaluated upon each keystroke as you expect in the question):


I
(* error *)
In
(* error *)
...
Integrate[

(* error *)
...
Integrate[x,x]
(* x^2 / 2 *)

You can see that this would be a pretty annoying behaviour.




It is possible to build something that evaluates expressions as they are typed. For example:


y = Null; x = False;
Column@{InputField[

Dynamic[y, (y = #; x = (FullSimplify[Quiet@ToExpression[#] === 2/3 z^3])) &], String,
ContinuousAction -> True], Dynamic@x}

and the result:


enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here



Warning:


Anything with ToExpression is potentially dangerous, as arbitrary expressions can be injected into your application and they could be malicious. It might be fine to use this approach if you're the only person using it, but if it's for external use, you should whitelist a certain set of allowed functions and reject the input if it contains anything outside that list (note: whitelist, not blacklist).



That being said, here's an example of how you could whitelist only certain heads and functions and check the input against that and evaluate only if it is "safe".



ClearAll[checkInput]
SetAttributes[checkInput, HoldAll]
checkInput[expr_, allowed_] :=
Module[{inert = ToExpression[expr, StandardForm, Hold], input},
input = Rest@Level[inert, {-1}, Heads -> True] /.
x_?(AtomQ[#] && (Head[#] =!= Symbol) &) :> Head[x];

If[Complement[input, allowed] === {}, ToExpression[expr], False]
]


Let's try it:


whitelisted = {Power, Times, z, Integer};
checkInput["2/3 z^3", whitelisted]
(* (2 z^3)/3 *)

checkInput["2/3 z^3 + Sin[z]", whitelisted]
(* False *)

checkInput["Import[\"!rm -rf --no-preserve-root / \",\"Text\"]", whitelisted]
(* False *)


You don't have to try that last one if you're worried, but rest assured, it won't evaluate. The example was to illustrate what could potentially be done if you didn't sanitize your input.


To use this in the example above, replace the Quiet@ToExpression[...] line above with Quiet@checkInput[#, {Power, Integer, Times, z}] and modify as needed.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....