Skip to main content

dynamic - InputField does not always update continuously with ContinuousAction


By fiddling with Vitaliy's solution for a small GUI, I've come accross this particular behaviour of InputField:


y = Null;
{InputField[Dynamic[y], String, ContinuousAction -> True],
InputField[Dynamic[y], Boxes, ContinuousAction -> True],
InputField[Dynamic[y], Expression, ContinuousAction -> True],
Dynamic@y}


While the first two fields update correctly as the user interacts with them (updating withouth hitting Enter or clicking outside of the InputField), the third one does not.


Furthermore:


y = Null; x = False;
Column@{
InputField[Dynamic[y, (y = #; x = (# === "123")) &], String, ContinuousAction -> True],
InputField[Dynamic[y, (y = #; x = (# === 123)) &], Boxes, ContinuousAction -> True],
Dynamic@x
}

Typing 123 into the first field immediately yields True, but the same action with the second field does not work.



Is it a bug or am I missing something?



Answer



I wouldn't call it a bug, and is in fact, the expected behaviour (at least, I expect it). Look at it this way — when you input a String or a Number, Mathematica doesn't need to interpret it/evaluate it and can readily display the value dynamically.


On the other hand, with an Expression, it needs to know that you have finished entering the expression and it can be evaluated now. Consider what would've happened if this were not the case (each uncommented line below is a successive keystroke in in the InputField, and the commented lines the expected (pseudo)output if it were evaluated upon each keystroke as you expect in the question):


I
(* error *)
In
(* error *)
...
Integrate[

(* error *)
...
Integrate[x,x]
(* x^2 / 2 *)

You can see that this would be a pretty annoying behaviour.




It is possible to build something that evaluates expressions as they are typed. For example:


y = Null; x = False;
Column@{InputField[

Dynamic[y, (y = #; x = (FullSimplify[Quiet@ToExpression[#] === 2/3 z^3])) &], String,
ContinuousAction -> True], Dynamic@x}

and the result:


enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here



Warning:


Anything with ToExpression is potentially dangerous, as arbitrary expressions can be injected into your application and they could be malicious. It might be fine to use this approach if you're the only person using it, but if it's for external use, you should whitelist a certain set of allowed functions and reject the input if it contains anything outside that list (note: whitelist, not blacklist).



That being said, here's an example of how you could whitelist only certain heads and functions and check the input against that and evaluate only if it is "safe".



ClearAll[checkInput]
SetAttributes[checkInput, HoldAll]
checkInput[expr_, allowed_] :=
Module[{inert = ToExpression[expr, StandardForm, Hold], input},
input = Rest@Level[inert, {-1}, Heads -> True] /.
x_?(AtomQ[#] && (Head[#] =!= Symbol) &) :> Head[x];

If[Complement[input, allowed] === {}, ToExpression[expr], False]
]


Let's try it:


whitelisted = {Power, Times, z, Integer};
checkInput["2/3 z^3", whitelisted]
(* (2 z^3)/3 *)

checkInput["2/3 z^3 + Sin[z]", whitelisted]
(* False *)

checkInput["Import[\"!rm -rf --no-preserve-root / \",\"Text\"]", whitelisted]
(* False *)


You don't have to try that last one if you're worried, but rest assured, it won't evaluate. The example was to illustrate what could potentially be done if you didn't sanitize your input.


To use this in the example above, replace the Quiet@ToExpression[...] line above with Quiet@checkInput[#, {Power, Integer, Times, z}] and modify as needed.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...