Skip to main content

list manipulation - How to repeat the nonblank string?


As the title, if I have a list:


{"", "", "", "2$70", ""}

I will expect:



{"", "", "", "2$70", "2$70"}

If I have


{"", "", "", "3$71", "", "2$72", ""}

then:


{"", "", "", "3$71", "3$71", "2$72", "2$72"}

And


{"", "", "", "3$71", "","", "2$72", ""}


should give


{"", "", "", "3$71", "3$71", "", "2$72", "2$72"}

This is my try:


{"", "", "", "2$70", ""} /. {p : Except["", String], ""} :> {p, p}

But I don't know why it doesn't work. Poor ability of pattern match. Can anybody give some advice?



Answer



As I presently interpret the question



(Now with refinements after considering Chris Degnen's simultaneous answer)


fn[list_] :=
  Partition[list, 2, 1, -1, ""] // Cases[{p_, ""} | {_, p_} :> p]

Test:


 {"", "x", "y", "", "z", ""} // fn


{"", "x", "y", "y", "z", "z"}


Patterns


Since you seem only to be interested in a pattern-matching solution here is my proposal to avoid the extremely slow use of ReplaceRepeated while still using pattern-matching as the core of the operation.


fn2[list_] :=
  list // ReplacePart @ 
   ReplaceList[list, {a___, p_, "", ___} :> (2 + Length@{a} -> p)]

Recursive replacement


I just realized that this is a perfect time to use a self-referential replacement:


fn3[list_] :=
  list /. {a___, p_, "", b___} :> {a, p, p, ##& @@ fn3@{b}}


Benchmark


All three methods are much faster than kglr's foo (note the log-log scale).


Now with Carl Woll's fc, the fastest method yet. ( but no patterns ;-) )


Needs["GeneralUtilities`"]

$RecursionLimit = 1*^5;

BenchmarkPlot[{foo, fn, fn2, fn3, fc},
  RandomChoice[{"", "", "", "a", "b"}, #] &

]

enter image description here


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more