Skip to main content

list manipulation - How to repeat the nonblank string?


As the title, if I have a list:


{"", "", "", "2$70", ""}

I will expect:



{"", "", "", "2$70", "2$70"}

If I have


{"", "", "", "3$71", "", "2$72", ""}

then:


{"", "", "", "3$71", "3$71", "2$72", "2$72"}

And


{"", "", "", "3$71", "","", "2$72", ""}


should give


{"", "", "", "3$71", "3$71", "", "2$72", "2$72"}

This is my try:


{"", "", "", "2$70", ""} /. {p : Except["", String], ""} :> {p, p}

But I don't know why it doesn't work. Poor ability of pattern match. Can anybody give some advice?



Answer



As I presently interpret the question



(Now with refinements after considering Chris Degnen's simultaneous answer)


fn[list_] :=
Partition[list, 2, 1, -1, ""] // Cases[{p_, ""} | {_, p_} :> p]

Test:


 {"", "x", "y", "", "z", ""} // fn


{"", "x", "y", "y", "z", "z"}


Patterns


Since you seem only to be interested in a pattern-matching solution here is my proposal to avoid the extremely slow use of ReplaceRepeated while still using pattern-matching as the core of the operation.


fn2[list_] :=
list // ReplacePart @
ReplaceList[list, {a___, p_, "", ___} :> (2 + Length@{a} -> p)]

Recursive replacement


I just realized that this is a perfect time to use a self-referential replacement:


fn3[list_] :=
list /. {a___, p_, "", b___} :> {a, p, p, ##& @@ fn3@{b}}


Benchmark


All three methods are much faster than kglr's foo (note the log-log scale).


Now with Carl Woll's fc, the fastest method yet. ( but no patterns ;-) )


Needs["GeneralUtilities`"]

$RecursionLimit = 1*^5;

BenchmarkPlot[{foo, fn, fn2, fn3, fc},
RandomChoice[{"", "", "", "a", "b"}, #] &

]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...