Skip to main content

Association of Associations : how to permute level 1 and level 2 keys?


I have a ragged Association of Association, say :


assoc = Association[
"1" -> Association["a" -> "x", "b" -> "y"],
"2" -> Association[ "b" -> "z", "c" -> "k"]
]


I would like to transform it into a Association where level 1 and level 2 keys are reversed, that is to say :


Association[
"a" -> Association["1" -> "x"],
"b" -> Association["1" -> "y", "2" -> "z"],
"c" -> Association[ "2" -> "k"]
]

My solution is :


keysExplodedList = Reap[MapIndexed[Sow[Reverse[#2] -> #1] &, assoc, {2}]][[2, 1]]
groupedLevel1 = GroupBy[#[[1, 1]] &] @ keysExplodedList

groupedLevel2 = GroupBy[#[[1, 2]] &] /@ groupedLevel1
result = Map[#[[1, 2]] &, groupedLevel2, {2}]


<|"a" -> <|"1" -> "x"|>, "b" -> <|"1" -> "y", "2" -> "z"|>, "c" -> <|"2" -> "k"|>|>



Is there something more elegant ?



Answer



Mathematica 10.1 almost supports this operation directly:


assoc // Query[Transpose]


(*
<| "a" -> <|"1" -> "x", "2" -> Missing["KeyAbsent", "a"]|>,
"b" -> <|"1" -> "y", "2" -> "z"|>,
"c" -> <|"1" -> Missing["KeyAbsent", "c"], "2" -> "k"|>
|>
*)

All that remains is to delete the unwanted Missing elements:


assoc // Query[Transpose] // DeleteMissing[#, 2]&


(*
<| "a" -> <|"1" -> "x"|>,
"b" -> <|"1" -> "y", "2" -> "z"|>,
"c" -> <|"2" -> "k"|>
|>
*)

We can see that Query uses the undocumented function GeneralUtilities`AssociationTranspose to do the heavy-lifting:


Query[Transpose] // Normal


(* GeneralUtilities`AssociationTranspose *)

assoc // GeneralUtilities`AssociationTranspose

(*
<| "a" -> <|"1" -> "x", "2" -> Missing["KeyAbsent", "a"]|>,
"b" -> <|"1" -> "y", "2" -> "z"|>,
"c" -> <|"1" -> Missing["KeyAbsent", "c"], "2" -> "k"|>
|>

*)

An Imperative Solution


The words "elegant" and "imperative" rarely appear together these days, but an imperative solution can express the transposition directly:


Module[{r = <| |>}
, Do[r = Merge[{r, <| j -> <| i -> assoc[[i, j]] |> |>}, Association]
, {i, Keys[assoc]}
, {j, Keys[assoc[[i]]]}
]
; r

]

(*
<| "a" -> <|"1" -> "x"|>,
"b" -> <|"1" -> "y", "2" -> "z"|>,
"c" -> <|"2" -> "k"|>
|>
*)

A ScanIndexed operator would come in handy here (the undocumented one in GeneralUtilities` is not, well, general enough).



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]