Skip to main content

Moving From Dynamic Module to Manipulate


In trying to implement Vitaly's suggestion about how to take control of Locator events, I have been able to make headway using DynamicModule. However, the ultimate destination is a demonstration, so I'd like to make the code work in Manipulate.


The Code


The following pared-down version works fine. It places 5 locators in a coordinate space with x and y axes displayed.


DynamicModule[{p1 = {0, 2}, p2 = {2, 0}, p3 = {4, -3}, p4 = {-3, 3}, p5 = {1, 1}},
EventHandler[

dQ[p_, q_] := EuclideanDistance[p, MousePosition["Graphics"]] <
EuclideanDistance[q, MousePosition["Graphics"]];
Dynamic[
Style[Graphics[{
{Red, Disk[{0, Round@p1[[2]]}, .2]},
{Blue, Disk[Round@p2, .2]},
{Green, Disk[p3, .2]},
{Brown, Disk[p4, .2]},
GraphicsGroup[{Black, Line[{.1 {0, 1.5} + p5, .1 {0, 3} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {0, -1.5} + p5, .1 {0, -3} + p5}],

Line[{.1 {-1.5, 0} + p5, .1 {-3, 0} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {1.5, 0} + p5, .1 {3, 0} + p5}],
Circle[{0, 0} + p5, .2], Gray, Disk[p5, .1]}]},
PlotRange -> 5, Axes -> True],Selectable -> False]],
{"MouseDragged" :>
(Which[
dQ[p1, p2] && dQ[p1, p3] && dQ[p1, p4] && dQ[p1, p5],
p1 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p2, p1] && dQ[p2, p3] && dQ[p2, p4] && dQ[p2, p5],
p2 = MousePosition["Graphics"],

dQ[p3, p1] && dQ[p3, p2] && dQ[p3, p4] && dQ[p3, p5],
p3 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p4, p1] && dQ[p4, p2] && dQ[p4, p3] && dQ[p4, p5],
p4 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p5, p1] && dQ[p5, p2] && dQ[p5, p3] && dQ[p5, p4],
p5 = MousePosition["Graphics"]])}]]

Moving to Manipulate


The issue is really quite simple. How can I successfully wrap this code in Manipulate? I've tried this:


 Manipulate[ 

,
{x,1,12,Slider} ]

[The slider serves no purpose at the moment.]


What happens


The manipulate screen appears as expected. However, evaluation goes into a loop. The cell right bracket blinks endlessly.


What causes this loop? Why doesn't it occur when I use DynamicModule without Manipulate?



Answer



You shouldn't have initialization code inside of the Manipulate. You're defining the function dQ inside the Manipulate, and by moving that definition to the Initialization option of Manipulate, you can make this behave much better.


Manipulate[

DynamicModule[{p1 = {0, 2}, p2 = {2, 0}, p3 = {4, -3}, p4 = {-3, 3},
p5 = {1, 1}}, EventHandler[
Dynamic[
Style[Graphics[{{Red, Disk[{0, Round@p1[[2]]}, .2]}, {Blue,
Disk[Round@p2, .2]}, {Green, Disk[p3, .2]}, {Brown,
Disk[p4, .2]},
GraphicsGroup[{Black, Line[{.1 {0, 1.5} + p5, .1 {0, 3} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {0, -1.5} + p5, .1 {0, -3} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {-1.5, 0} + p5, .1 {-3, 0} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {1.5, 0} + p5, .1 {3, 0} + p5}],

Circle[{0, 0} + p5, .2], Gray, Disk[p5, .1]}]},
PlotRange -> 5, Axes -> True],
Selectable ->
False]], {"MouseDragged" :> (Which[
dQ[p1, p2] && dQ[p1, p3] && dQ[p1, p4] && dQ[p1, p5],
p1 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p2, p1] && dQ[p2, p3] && dQ[p2, p4] && dQ[p2, p5],
p2 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p3, p1] && dQ[p3, p2] && dQ[p3, p4] && dQ[p3, p5],
p3 = MousePosition["Graphics"],

dQ[p4, p1] && dQ[p4, p2] && dQ[p4, p3] && dQ[p4, p5],
p4 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p5, p1] && dQ[p5, p2] && dQ[p5, p3] && dQ[p5, p4],
p5 = MousePosition["Graphics"]])}]], {x, 1, 12, Slider},
Initialization :> (dQ[p_, q_] :=
EuclideanDistance[p, MousePosition["Graphics"]] <
EuclideanDistance[q, MousePosition["Graphics"]])]

EDIT:


I should say something else about this answer. I answered the question you asked, but the way I answered it exposes another potential problem. Manipulate wraps its entire contents in a Dynamic. If that outer Dynamic happens to re-trigger, it will recreate the DynamicModule and reinitialize all of your DynamicModule variables. This would certainly happen when you close and reopen the notebook. It could also happen if you add dependencies to the Manipulate variables outside of the inner Dynamic. So, really, a better version of my answer would be to move the DynamicModule out of the Manipulate like this:



DynamicModule[{p1 = {0, 2}, p2 = {2, 0}, p3 = {4, -3}, p4 = {-3, 3}, 
p5 = {1, 1}}, Manipulate[EventHandler[
Dynamic[
Style[Graphics[{{Red, Disk[{0, Round@p1[[2]]}, .2]}, {Blue,
Disk[Round@p2, .2]}, {Green, Disk[p3, .2]}, {Brown,
Disk[p4, .2]},
GraphicsGroup[{Black, Line[{.1 {0, 1.5} + p5, .1 {0, 3} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {0, -1.5} + p5, .1 {0, -3} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {-1.5, 0} + p5, .1 {-3, 0} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {1.5, 0} + p5, .1 {3, 0} + p5}],

Circle[{0, 0} + p5, .2], Gray, Disk[p5, .1]}]},
PlotRange -> 5, Axes -> True],
Selectable ->
False]], {"MouseDragged" :> (Which[
dQ[p1, p2] && dQ[p1, p3] && dQ[p1, p4] && dQ[p1, p5],
p1 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p2, p1] && dQ[p2, p3] && dQ[p2, p4] && dQ[p2, p5],
p2 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p3, p1] && dQ[p3, p2] && dQ[p3, p4] && dQ[p3, p5],
p3 = MousePosition["Graphics"],

dQ[p4, p1] && dQ[p4, p2] && dQ[p4, p3] && dQ[p4, p5],
p4 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p5, p1] && dQ[p5, p2] && dQ[p5, p3] && dQ[p5, p4],
p5 = MousePosition["Graphics"]])}], {x, 1, 12, Slider},
Initialization :> (dQ[p_, q_] :=
EuclideanDistance[p, MousePosition["Graphics"]] <
EuclideanDistance[q, MousePosition["Graphics"]])]]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.