Skip to main content

Moving From Dynamic Module to Manipulate


In trying to implement Vitaly's suggestion about how to take control of Locator events, I have been able to make headway using DynamicModule. However, the ultimate destination is a demonstration, so I'd like to make the code work in Manipulate.


The Code


The following pared-down version works fine. It places 5 locators in a coordinate space with x and y axes displayed.


DynamicModule[{p1 = {0, 2}, p2 = {2, 0}, p3 = {4, -3}, p4 = {-3, 3}, p5 = {1, 1}},
EventHandler[

dQ[p_, q_] := EuclideanDistance[p, MousePosition["Graphics"]] <
EuclideanDistance[q, MousePosition["Graphics"]];
Dynamic[
Style[Graphics[{
{Red, Disk[{0, Round@p1[[2]]}, .2]},
{Blue, Disk[Round@p2, .2]},
{Green, Disk[p3, .2]},
{Brown, Disk[p4, .2]},
GraphicsGroup[{Black, Line[{.1 {0, 1.5} + p5, .1 {0, 3} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {0, -1.5} + p5, .1 {0, -3} + p5}],

Line[{.1 {-1.5, 0} + p5, .1 {-3, 0} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {1.5, 0} + p5, .1 {3, 0} + p5}],
Circle[{0, 0} + p5, .2], Gray, Disk[p5, .1]}]},
PlotRange -> 5, Axes -> True],Selectable -> False]],
{"MouseDragged" :>
(Which[
dQ[p1, p2] && dQ[p1, p3] && dQ[p1, p4] && dQ[p1, p5],
p1 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p2, p1] && dQ[p2, p3] && dQ[p2, p4] && dQ[p2, p5],
p2 = MousePosition["Graphics"],

dQ[p3, p1] && dQ[p3, p2] && dQ[p3, p4] && dQ[p3, p5],
p3 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p4, p1] && dQ[p4, p2] && dQ[p4, p3] && dQ[p4, p5],
p4 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p5, p1] && dQ[p5, p2] && dQ[p5, p3] && dQ[p5, p4],
p5 = MousePosition["Graphics"]])}]]

Moving to Manipulate


The issue is really quite simple. How can I successfully wrap this code in Manipulate? I've tried this:


 Manipulate[ 

,
{x,1,12,Slider} ]

[The slider serves no purpose at the moment.]


What happens


The manipulate screen appears as expected. However, evaluation goes into a loop. The cell right bracket blinks endlessly.


What causes this loop? Why doesn't it occur when I use DynamicModule without Manipulate?



Answer



You shouldn't have initialization code inside of the Manipulate. You're defining the function dQ inside the Manipulate, and by moving that definition to the Initialization option of Manipulate, you can make this behave much better.


Manipulate[

DynamicModule[{p1 = {0, 2}, p2 = {2, 0}, p3 = {4, -3}, p4 = {-3, 3},
p5 = {1, 1}}, EventHandler[
Dynamic[
Style[Graphics[{{Red, Disk[{0, Round@p1[[2]]}, .2]}, {Blue,
Disk[Round@p2, .2]}, {Green, Disk[p3, .2]}, {Brown,
Disk[p4, .2]},
GraphicsGroup[{Black, Line[{.1 {0, 1.5} + p5, .1 {0, 3} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {0, -1.5} + p5, .1 {0, -3} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {-1.5, 0} + p5, .1 {-3, 0} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {1.5, 0} + p5, .1 {3, 0} + p5}],

Circle[{0, 0} + p5, .2], Gray, Disk[p5, .1]}]},
PlotRange -> 5, Axes -> True],
Selectable ->
False]], {"MouseDragged" :> (Which[
dQ[p1, p2] && dQ[p1, p3] && dQ[p1, p4] && dQ[p1, p5],
p1 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p2, p1] && dQ[p2, p3] && dQ[p2, p4] && dQ[p2, p5],
p2 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p3, p1] && dQ[p3, p2] && dQ[p3, p4] && dQ[p3, p5],
p3 = MousePosition["Graphics"],

dQ[p4, p1] && dQ[p4, p2] && dQ[p4, p3] && dQ[p4, p5],
p4 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p5, p1] && dQ[p5, p2] && dQ[p5, p3] && dQ[p5, p4],
p5 = MousePosition["Graphics"]])}]], {x, 1, 12, Slider},
Initialization :> (dQ[p_, q_] :=
EuclideanDistance[p, MousePosition["Graphics"]] <
EuclideanDistance[q, MousePosition["Graphics"]])]

EDIT:


I should say something else about this answer. I answered the question you asked, but the way I answered it exposes another potential problem. Manipulate wraps its entire contents in a Dynamic. If that outer Dynamic happens to re-trigger, it will recreate the DynamicModule and reinitialize all of your DynamicModule variables. This would certainly happen when you close and reopen the notebook. It could also happen if you add dependencies to the Manipulate variables outside of the inner Dynamic. So, really, a better version of my answer would be to move the DynamicModule out of the Manipulate like this:



DynamicModule[{p1 = {0, 2}, p2 = {2, 0}, p3 = {4, -3}, p4 = {-3, 3}, 
p5 = {1, 1}}, Manipulate[EventHandler[
Dynamic[
Style[Graphics[{{Red, Disk[{0, Round@p1[[2]]}, .2]}, {Blue,
Disk[Round@p2, .2]}, {Green, Disk[p3, .2]}, {Brown,
Disk[p4, .2]},
GraphicsGroup[{Black, Line[{.1 {0, 1.5} + p5, .1 {0, 3} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {0, -1.5} + p5, .1 {0, -3} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {-1.5, 0} + p5, .1 {-3, 0} + p5}],
Line[{.1 {1.5, 0} + p5, .1 {3, 0} + p5}],

Circle[{0, 0} + p5, .2], Gray, Disk[p5, .1]}]},
PlotRange -> 5, Axes -> True],
Selectable ->
False]], {"MouseDragged" :> (Which[
dQ[p1, p2] && dQ[p1, p3] && dQ[p1, p4] && dQ[p1, p5],
p1 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p2, p1] && dQ[p2, p3] && dQ[p2, p4] && dQ[p2, p5],
p2 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p3, p1] && dQ[p3, p2] && dQ[p3, p4] && dQ[p3, p5],
p3 = MousePosition["Graphics"],

dQ[p4, p1] && dQ[p4, p2] && dQ[p4, p3] && dQ[p4, p5],
p4 = MousePosition["Graphics"],
dQ[p5, p1] && dQ[p5, p2] && dQ[p5, p3] && dQ[p5, p4],
p5 = MousePosition["Graphics"]])}], {x, 1, 12, Slider},
Initialization :> (dQ[p_, q_] :=
EuclideanDistance[p, MousePosition["Graphics"]] <
EuclideanDistance[q, MousePosition["Graphics"]])]]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...