Skip to main content

evaluation - Contexts and parallelization


This question is related to my previous one here. I opened a new question because I think that the root cause is different though. BTW I use MMA 9 on a mac OS X 10.11 (El Capitan).


I put here a minimal example. I define a constant:



const`precisionRate = 10

and a function which uses this constant:


f = Function[x, N[x^2, const`precisionRate]];

when I look at the definition of my function I get as expected:


def


If I run it I get as expected:


f[2]
(*4.000000000*)


Using it within table also works:


Table[{y, f[y]}, {y, -1, 1, 0.1}]
(*{{-1., 1.}, {-0.9, 0.81}, {-0.8, 0.64}, {-0.7, 0.49}, {-0.6, 
0.36}, {-0.5, 0.25}, {-0.4, 0.16}, {-0.3, 0.09}, {-0.2, 
0.04}, {-0.1, 0.01}, {0., 0.}, {0.1, 0.01}, {0.2, 0.04}, {0.3, 
0.09}, {0.4, 0.16}, {0.5, 0.25}, {0.6, 0.36}, {0.7, 0.49}, {0.8, 
0.64}, {0.9, 0.81}, {1., 1.}}*)

But when I run:



ParallelTable[{y, f[y]}, {y, -1, 1, 0.1}]

I get an error (from each kernel separately of course):


enter image description here


Why does prallelization screw this up?



Answer



I am not 100% comfortable about this aspect of parallelization, so this is not going to be a full answer, but here are some hints:


In order for a piece of code to run in parallel, all definitions it uses must be copied to the subkernels. This is called "distributing" the definitions and can be done manually by DistributeDefinitions. It is also done automatically by most parallel functions (such as ParallelTable). A notable exception was ParallelEvaluate until version 10.4 .


Automatic distribution is done only for $Context. This is controlled by $DistributedContexts.


Why not distribute definitions for all contexts? Because for a package to work properly, it may not be sufficient to just copy all definitions from its context. The package may do things upon loading which are more complex than issuing definitions. E.g. it may load LibraryFunctions. Thus packages are meant to be loaded on parallel kernels using ParallelNeeds instead of just copying their definitions over from the main kernel.



What can you do then?


Either


DistributeDefinitions[const`precisionRate]

to manually distribute the definitions of this one symbol, or


$DistributedContexts := {$Context, "const`"}

to automatically distribute everything from the const` context. The second solution looks cleaner to me.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more