Skip to main content

evaluation - Contexts and parallelization


This question is related to my previous one here. I opened a new question because I think that the root cause is different though. BTW I use MMA 9 on a mac OS X 10.11 (El Capitan).


I put here a minimal example. I define a constant:



const`precisionRate = 10

and a function which uses this constant:


f = Function[x, N[x^2, const`precisionRate]];

when I look at the definition of my function I get as expected:


def


If I run it I get as expected:


f[2]
(*4.000000000*)


Using it within table also works:


Table[{y, f[y]}, {y, -1, 1, 0.1}]
(*{{-1., 1.}, {-0.9, 0.81}, {-0.8, 0.64}, {-0.7, 0.49}, {-0.6, 
0.36}, {-0.5, 0.25}, {-0.4, 0.16}, {-0.3, 0.09}, {-0.2, 
0.04}, {-0.1, 0.01}, {0., 0.}, {0.1, 0.01}, {0.2, 0.04}, {0.3, 
0.09}, {0.4, 0.16}, {0.5, 0.25}, {0.6, 0.36}, {0.7, 0.49}, {0.8, 
0.64}, {0.9, 0.81}, {1., 1.}}*)

But when I run:



ParallelTable[{y, f[y]}, {y, -1, 1, 0.1}]

I get an error (from each kernel separately of course):


enter image description here


Why does prallelization screw this up?



Answer



I am not 100% comfortable about this aspect of parallelization, so this is not going to be a full answer, but here are some hints:


In order for a piece of code to run in parallel, all definitions it uses must be copied to the subkernels. This is called "distributing" the definitions and can be done manually by DistributeDefinitions. It is also done automatically by most parallel functions (such as ParallelTable). A notable exception was ParallelEvaluate until version 10.4 .


Automatic distribution is done only for $Context. This is controlled by $DistributedContexts.


Why not distribute definitions for all contexts? Because for a package to work properly, it may not be sufficient to just copy all definitions from its context. The package may do things upon loading which are more complex than issuing definitions. E.g. it may load LibraryFunctions. Thus packages are meant to be loaded on parallel kernels using ParallelNeeds instead of just copying their definitions over from the main kernel.



What can you do then?


Either


DistributeDefinitions[const`precisionRate]

to manually distribute the definitions of this one symbol, or


$DistributedContexts := {$Context, "const`"}

to automatically distribute everything from the const` context. The second solution looks cleaner to me.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...
Post a Comment
Read more

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...
Post a Comment
Read more