Skip to main content

bugs - Streaming`LazyList`Testing may have a leak



Bug introduced in 10.2 and fixed in 10.3


Version 10.2; Win64 Enterprise.


I'm seeing this message...



data::shdw: Symbol data appears in multiple contexts {Streaming`LazyList`Testing`, Global`}; definitions in context Streaming`LazyList`Testing` may shadow or be shadowed by other definitions.



... while executing some transformations on a big Dataset. I'm not convinced that I created the Global`data symbol explicitly; it's certainly the name of local symbols within Modules I have though.


I wonder though if there is a risk of a collision if I actually give data a value now.



Answer



UPDATE The behaviour no longer occurs in version 10.3.




Here are minimal reproduction steps, from a fresh 10.2.0 kernel:


Module[{data = {{1}}}, data // Dataset // Transpose]

(*
data::shdw: Symbol data appears in multiple contexts {Streaming`LazyList`Testing`,Global`};
definitions in context Streaming`LazyList`Testing` may shadow or
be shadowed by other definitions. >>
*)


After executing this, the $ContextPath looks suspicious:


$ContextPath

(* {"Streaming`LazyList`Testing`", "Streaming`", "StreamingLoader`",
"IconizeLoader`", "CloudObjectLoader`", "PacletManager`",
"System`", "Global`"} *)

Diagnosis


Upon further investigation, the problem appears to involve two causes. First, the streaming framework unconditionally loads and executes its test suite, adding it to the context path. To see this, inspect the following file:


NotebookOpen @ FileNameJoin @

{"SystemFiles","Components","Streaming","StreamingLoader.m"}

... and note the following lines near the top:


Get[FileNameJoin[{DirectoryName[$InputFileName],"TestDSL.m"}]];
Block[{$ContextPath},
Get[FileNameJoin[{DirectoryName[$InputFileName],"Tests.m"}]]
]

The second cause appears to be related to a cyclic dependency between the Streaming` and Dataset` packages (and possible between other packages as well). Dataset`$AvailableBackends contains an implicit reference to Streaming`CachedObject, triggering a load via Package`ActivateLoad. The Streaming` package, in turn, has an explicit dependency upon the Dataset` package.


Normally, the act of auto-loading a package makes no changes to the $ContextPath. The presence of cyclic dependencies has historically interfered with the preservation of this path, so I suspect that it is at least part of the problem here.



Partial Workaround


The effects of both problems can be reduced by pre-loading the Streaming` package as the first action of a new kernel session:


Quiet @ Block[{$ContextPath}, Needs["Streaming`"]]

This preloading action leaves us with a cleaner environment:


Module[{data = {{1}}}, data // Dataset // Transpose]
(* Dataset[...] *)

$ContextPath
(* {"StreamingLoader`", "IconizeLoader`", "CloudObjectLoader`",

"PacletManager`", "System`", "Global`"} *)

The observant reader will have noticed the presence of Quiet in the preloading step. It is needed to suppress another symbol conflict between System`ToCamelCase and GeneralUtilities`ToCamelCase. It would appear that there are similar auto-loading issues elsewhere. Therefore this solution can only really be considered as a partial work-around.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...