Skip to main content

fourier analysis - calling CUDA library functions


Mathematica has some predefined CUDA functions, like CUDAMap, CUDAFourier, etc. My question is how can one call functions which are part of CUDA library but not part of predefined Mathematica functions? For example, CUDA 6.0 has a large Math library; so if I am to call cuFFT from that library instead of using CUDAFourier, how would I go about doing this? Do I have to write a C code which calls the cuda library function and then call the c function from Mathematica. That seems too round about way of doing something. I could not quite find it in the documentation. Thanks very much!



Answer



CUDALink allows you to write custom kernels but unfortunately it doesn't allow to use its CUDAMemory in other functions. I found two methods to deal with it.


Documented method


You can use LibraryLink and call CUDA functions as in a regular CUDA program. For example, you can write something like fourier.cu. Then you can compile it and load "fourier_single" or "fourier" depending on your GPU architecture



SetDirectory@NotebookDirectory[];
Needs["CUDALink`"]
CreateLibrary[{"fourier.cu"}, "libfourier",
"Compiler" -> NVCCCompiler, "Libraries" -> "cufft"];
AppendTo[$LibraryPath, NotebookDirectory[]];
fourier = LibraryFunctionLoad["libfourier", "fourier", {{_Complex, 1}}, {_Complex, 1}];

I don't consider this method in details because it has a big disadvantage: you have to copy your data to GPU and backward every time you call the function.


Undocumented method


Let us look through system files of Mathematica. There are brilliant examples in $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/Links/CUDALink/CSource/! They use undocumented MathematicaGPULibrary (WGL). This library allows to interact directly with CUDAMemory by its ID. I adapted these examples to demonstrate the usage of 1D single precision CUFFT (say, "fourier.cu" in the same directory as the notebook)



#include    
#include

#define wglState (wglData->state)
#define wglErr (wglData->getError(wglData))
#define WGL_SuccessQ (wglErr->code == WGL_Success)
#define WGL_FailQ (!WGL_SuccessQ)
#define WGL_Type_RealQ(mem) ((mem)->type == WGL_Real_t)

#define WGL_SAFE_CALL(stmt, jmp) stmt; if (WGL_FailQ) { goto jmp; }


WolframGPULibraryData wglData = NULL;

static int iFourier(WGL_Memory_t input, WGL_Memory_t output) {
int err;

err = LIBRARY_FUNCTION_ERROR;

if (input->type != output->type) {
return LIBRARY_TYPE_ERROR;

} else if (input->flattenedLength != output->flattenedLength) {
return LIBRARY_DIMENSION_ERROR;
}

WGL_SAFE_CALL(CUDA_Runtime_setMemoryAsInput(wglState, input, wglErr), cleanup);
WGL_SAFE_CALL(CUDA_Runtime_setMemoryAsOutput(wglState, output, wglErr), cleanup);

cufftHandle plan;
cufftPlan1d(&plan, input->flattenedLength, CUFFT_C2C, 1);


cufftExecC2C(
plan,
(cufftComplex *)CUDA_Runtime_getDeviceMemoryAsComplexFloat(input),
(cufftComplex *)CUDA_Runtime_getDeviceMemoryAsComplexFloat(output),
CUFFT_INVERSE
);
cufftDestroy(plan);


err = LIBRARY_NO_ERROR;


cleanup:
if (WGL_SuccessQ) {
CUDA_Runtime_setMemoryAsValidOutput(wglState, output, wglErr);
} else {
CUDA_Runtime_setMemoryAsInvalidOutput(wglState, output, wglErr);
}
CUDA_Runtime_unsetMemoryAsInput(wglState, input, wglErr);
if (WGL_SuccessQ && err == LIBRARY_NO_ERROR) {
return LIBRARY_NO_ERROR;

} else {
return LIBRARY_FUNCTION_ERROR;
}
}

EXTERN_C DLLEXPORT int oFourier(WolframLibraryData libData, mint Argc, MArgument * Args, MArgument Res) {
WGL_Memory_t input, output;
mint inputId, outputId;
int err = LIBRARY_FUNCTION_ERROR;


inputId = MArgument_getInteger(Args[0]);
outputId = MArgument_getInteger(Args[1]);

WGL_SAFE_CALL(wglData->setWolframLibraryData(wglData, libData), cleanup);

WGL_SAFE_CALL(input = wglData->findMemory(wglData, inputId), cleanup);
WGL_SAFE_CALL(output = wglData->findMemory(wglData, outputId), cleanup);

err = iFourier(input, output);


cleanup:
return err;
}

EXTERN_C DLLEXPORT int WolframGPULibrary_initialize(WolframGPULibraryData wglData0) {
wglData = wglData0;
return LIBRARY_NO_ERROR;
}

EXTERN_C DLLEXPORT int WolframLibrary_initialize(WolframLibraryData libData) {

return LIBRARY_NO_ERROR;
}

EXTERN_C DLLEXPORT void WolframLibrary_uninitialize( ) {
return;
}

Let's go back to Mathematica and compile the source and load the function


SetDirectory@NotebookDirectory[];
Needs["CUDALink`"]

CreateLibrary[{"fourier.cu"}, "libfourier.so",
"TargetDirectory" -> ".", "Compiler" -> NVCCCompiler,
"Defines" -> "CONFIG_USE_CUDA",
"Libraries" -> FileNameJoin@{$CUDALinkLibraryPath, "libCUDALink_Single.so"}];

fourier =
CUDAFunctionLoad[{FileNameJoin@{NotebookDirectory[],
"libfourier.so"}},
"oFourier", {{_Integer, "Input"}, {_Integer, "Output"}}, 256,
TargetPrecision -> "Single"];


Notes:




  • CONFIG_USE_CUDA flag is necessary for using CUDA in WGL. Another flag is CONFIG_USE_OPENCL.




  • Initialization of WGL fails without "Libraries" -> FileNameJoin@{$CUDALinkLibraryPath, "libCUDALink_Single.so"}. However everything will work if you evaluate any built-in CUDA* function before.





  • For double precision change Single to Double, Float to Double, C2C to Z2Z and cufftComplex to cufftDoubleComplex everywhere above and below.




  • CUFFT_INVERSE corresponds to forward Fourier with FourierParameters -> {1, 1}.




  • Input and output is _Integer because they transfer integer IDs, not the data itself.




  • Headers of WGL are located in GPUTools`Internal`$GPUToolsSystemResourcesPath





  • Built-in functions like CUDAFourier are loaded in $CUDALinkPath/CUDALink.m. It can be used as an example of loading WGL functions.




Tests (change 2^24 to an appropriate value if you don't have enough GPU memory):


x = RandomComplex[{-1 - I, 1 + I}, 2^24];
ByteCount[x]
(* 268435600 *)


f1 = Fourier[x]; // AbsoluteTiming
(* {0.404416, Null} *)

gx = CUDAMemoryLoad[x, TargetPrecision -> "Single"]
gf = CUDAMemoryAllocate[Complex, Length[x], TargetPrecision -> "Single"]
(* CUDAMemory["<587248096>", "ComplexFloat"] *)
(* CUDAMemory["<1373924031>", "ComplexFloat"] *)

fourier[gx, gf]; // AbsoluteTiming
f2 = CUDAMemoryGet@gf/Sqrt@Length@x;

Norm[f2 - f1]/Norm[f1]
(* {0.010405, Null} *)
(* 2.64293*10^-7 *)

CUDAMemoryUnload[gf];
gf = CUDAFourier[gx]; // AbsoluteTiming
f3 = CUDAMemoryGet@gf;
Norm[f3 - f1]/Norm[f1]
(* {0.183712, Null} *)
(* 2.25279*10^-8 *)


CUDAMemoryUnload[gf, gx]

It works! I tested it with GTX 560 (2.0 architecture, showed above) and 9600M GT (1.1 architecture without double-precision) on Linux. Both tests show that our fourier is much faster then CPU and faster then built-in CUDAFourier. On GTX 560 CUDAFourier is relatively slow because it uses double precision and I don't know how to switch it to the single precision.


I will appreciate for any tests of WGL on other systems!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....