Skip to main content

matrix - Why is this Mathematica code unable to solve for the real parameter set?


I tried using Bill's code for obtaining the parameters $\theta, \phi$ and $\lambda$ for the unitary


$$Z=\begin{pmatrix}\frac{1}{\sqrt 2} & \frac{i}{\sqrt 2} \\ \frac{i}{\sqrt 2} & \frac{1}{\sqrt 2} \end{pmatrix}$$.


Here's my code:


Z = {{1/Sqrt[2], I/Sqrt[2]}, {I/Sqrt[2], 1/Sqrt[2]}};
U = {{Cos[\[Theta]/
2], -E^(I \[Lambda]) Sin[\[Theta]/
2]}, {E^(I \[CurlyPhi]) Sin[\[Theta]/2],
E^(I (\[Lambda] + \[CurlyPhi])) Cos[\[Theta]/2]}};
N[Reduce[Z == U && 0 <= \[CurlyPhi] < 2 Pi && 0 <= \[Theta] <= Pi &&

0 <= \[Lambda] < 2 Pi, {\[Theta], \[CurlyPhi], \[Lambda]}, Reals]]

But it says:


"The system {1/Sqrt[2],I/Sqrt[2]}=={Cos[\[Theta]/2],-E^(I\\[Lambda])\ \
Sin[\[Theta]/2]}&&{I/Sqrt[2],1/Sqrt[2]}=={E^(I\\[CurlyPhi])\ Sin[\
\[Theta]/2],E^(I\(\[Lambda]+\[CurlyPhi]))\ Cos[\[Theta]/2]}&&0<=\
\[CurlyPhi]<2\ \[Pi]&&0<=\[Theta]<=\[Pi]&&0<=\[Lambda]<2\ \[Pi] \
contains a nonreal constant I/Sqrt[2]. With the domain Reals \
specified, all constants should be real. "


I don't quite understand this error. By inspection, one simple solution for the given $Z$ is $$(\theta, \phi,\lambda) = (\pi/2,\pi/2,3\pi/2)$$ and clearly $ZZ^{\dagger}=I$.


So why is Mathematica returning me complex values for the angle parameters instead of the simple real solution? Am I missing something?



Answer



Try this


Z = {{1/Sqrt[2], I/Sqrt[2]}, {I/Sqrt[2], 1/Sqrt[2]}};
U = {{Cos[θ/2], -E^(I λ) Sin[θ/2]}, {E^(I ϕ) Sin[θ/2],E^(I (λ + ϕ)) Cos[θ/2]}};
FullSimplify[Reduce[Z == U && 0<=ϕ<2 Pi && 0<=θ<=Pi && 0<=λ<2 Pi, {θ, ϕ, λ}]]

which quickly returns


2*θ == Pi && 2*ϕ == Pi && 2*λ == 3*Pi


There are a vast number of algorithms hiding inside of Reduce and it is often difficult to diagnose exactly what is happening behind the curtain. But it is still very impressive what it is able to accomplish with the tap of a key.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...