Skip to main content

pattern matching - Split a Unicode string maintaining uppercase characters



I want to split a string according to a predefined set of substrings (lowercase), though the actual text can contain uppercase characters anyplace. The task is to find the matches, longer preferred over shorter (like "tt" over "t" hence the order of alt) and to maintain upper/lowercase status. Since StringCases has a quirk not being able to correctly recognize some upper/lowercase characters (cf. here), the solution is not trivial.


The following code matches every element in alt correctly, though it also converts everything to lowercase:


alt = "tt" | "t" | "a" | "á";
word = "TtattÁatT";
StringCases[ToLowerCase@word, alt]


{"tt", "a", "tt", "á", "a", "tt"}



The next one, while correctly maintains capital letters, fails to recognize "Á" as the uppercase version of "á" (or of a, see later).



StringCases[word, alt, IgnoreCase -> True]


{"Tt", "a", "tt", "a", "tT"}



The problem here is that StringMatchQ returns False:


StringMatchQ["A", "a", IgnoreCase -> True]       (* ==> True *)
StringMatchQ["Á", "á", IgnoreCase -> True] (* ==> False *)
StringMatchQ["Á", "a", IgnoreCase -> True] (* ==> False *)
StringMatchQ["Á", "á" | "a", IgnoreCase -> True] (* ==> True *)

(* for the record *)
ToLowerCase@"Á" === "á" (* ==> True *)
ToUpperCase@"á" === "Á" (* ==> True *)

I think it actually is a bug, as this behaviour is rather inconsistent. Nevertheless, the next code I came up with to match "Á" fails:


StringCases[word, __?(StringMatchQ[#, alt, IgnoreCase -> True] &), IgnoreCase -> True]


{"Ttatt", "atT"}




It cannot recognize "Á", and it splits by the longest match instead of exact matches.


Is it possible to overcome somehow this issue without explicitly listing all combinations of upper/lowercase letters (like "a"|"A"|"á"|"Á"|"tt"|"tT"|"Tt"|...) or saving and restoring character states (upper/lowercase) manually? There are nice examples how the string patternmatcher can be used effectively, I hope this can be solved as well.


Question


Given a possibly large list of short elementary strings like "tt" | "t" | "a" | "á", how can a larger string be split into elementary substrings with keeping all uppercase letters correctly. For example:


"TtattÁatT" == > {"Tt", "a", "tt", "Á", "a", "tT"}

Answer



You can do the lower case conversion as a condition on the pattern, and thereby retain the original:


StringCases["TtattÁatT", c__ /; MemberQ[List@@alt, ToLowerCase[c]]]



{"Tt", "a", "tt", "Á", "a", "tT"}



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]