Skip to main content

Plotting discrete data but not using discreteplot function


For a given function:


Plot[Sqrt[Abs[x]], {x, -Pi, Pi}]

I have the code to draw the function (with its Abs remove), partial sums and cesaro means as:


f[x_] := Sqrt[x]
s[k_, x_] := \frac{2\sqrt{\pi}}{3}+(-Sqrt[2] FresnelS[Sqrt[2] Sqrt[n]] + 2 Sqrt[n] Sin[n \[Pi]])/(n^(3/2) Sqrt[\[Pi]]) Cos[n x], {n, 1, k}] 
partialsums[x_] = Table[s[n, x], {n, {4}}]; 
c[n_, x_] := (1/n) Sum[s[m, x], {m, 0, n - 1}]

Plot[Evaluate[{f[x], partialsums[x], c[4, x]}], {x, -Pi, Pi},
PlotLegends -> {"f(x)=x", "Fourier, 4 terms", "Cesaro, 4 terms"}, 
PlotStyle -> {{Blue}, {Dashed, Thickness[0.006]}, {Red, Thickness[0.006]}}]

This code fails on my computer and hence I resolve to manual computation.


Updates: It turn out that I can easily solve this issue by removing the k with any number rather than letting it to be indefinite. Although I am not certain the graph is right for k=4 as both graphs(Partial and Cesaro) coincides with each other.



Answer



Maybe


plt = Plot[f[k], {k, 0, 50}, Frame -> True, PlotStyle -> Red,ImageSize -> 300];
dplt = DiscretePlot[cesaro[k], {k, 0, 50}, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> PlotRange[plt],

PlotStyle -> Directive[{Blue, Dashed}], Joined -> True, ImageSize -> 300]; 
Row[{plt, dplt, Show[plt, dplt]}]

enter image description here


Update: or, perhaps, this:?


 dplt2 = DiscretePlot[cesaro[k], {k, 0, 50}, Frame -> True, Filling -> None, 
 PlotRange -> PlotRange[plt], PlotStyle -> Blue, Joined -> True, ImageSize -> 300];
 Row[{plt, dplt2, Show[plt, dplt2]}]

enter image description here



or, using Interpolation on cesaro[k] and


 intFCsr = Interpolation[Table[{k, cesaro[k]}, {k, 0, 50}]];
 Plot[{f[k], intFCsr[k]}, {k, 0, 50}, Frame -> True,PlotStyle -> {Red, Blue}]

enter image description here


Update 2:


 intFCsr = Interpolation[Table[{k, cesaro[k]}, {k, 0, 50}]];
 intFPrtlSms = Interpolation[Table[{k, part[k]}, {k, 0, 50}]];
 Plot[{f[k], intFCsr[k], intFPrtlSms[k]/15}, {k, 0, 50},  ImagePadding -> 45,
 Frame -> True, PlotStyle -> {Red, Blue, Black}, ImageSize -> 500,

 FrameLabel -> {{Style["f, cesaro", 12], Style["partial sum", 12]},
   {Style["k", 12], Style["plot label", 14]}},
 FrameTicks -> {{Join[{#, #, {.01, 0}} & /@ Range[0, 4.],
   {#, " ", {.0075, 0}} & /@ Range[0.2, 4., .2]],
  Join[{#, 15 #, {.01, 0}} & /@ Range[0, 4.],
    {#, " ", {.0075, 0}} & /@ Range[0.2, 4., .2]]}, {Automatic, Automatic}}]

enter image description here


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more