Skip to main content

bugs - Cell @ CellGroupData[... in Cells family


Bug introduced in V10.4 or earlier and persisting through V11.3




Background


This question originates from two already posted questions updated with further doubts I've faced. I deleted one and merged content here.


Those issues are closely related, hard to separate and probably could be caused by the same internal features so I decided to make one question





CellGroupData assumptions


First of all, according to tutorial/TheStructureOfCells a cell of the form Cell[CellGroupData[...],...] is a valid Cell so in my opinion we should expect consistent behavior.


CellGroupData second argument allows to specify which cells are visible. It could be Open, Closed, {cells indices}, or even {} to show no cell.


That is not the case in general:


Issues




  1. Inner CellGroupData expression are transparent to parent's visibility spec:


    CellGroupData[

    { Cell[...]
    , Cell @ CellGroupData[...]
    , Cell[...]
    }
    , {2}
    ]

    I'd expect the structure above to show only and exactly what Cell @ CellGroupData[...] contains.


    It is not the case, the outer CellGroupData can't handle nested structure this way and just goes into deeper CellGroups which is unintuitive and contradicts CellGroupData documentation.


    Try yourself



    Notebook[
    { Cell @ CellGroupData[
    { Cell["1", "Text"]
    , Cell @ CellGroupData[
    {Cell["2-1", "Text"], Cell["2-2", "Text"]}]
    , Cell["3", "Text"]
    }
    , {3}
    ]
    }

    , CellGrouping -> Manual
    , ShowGroupOpener -> False
    ] // NotebookPut






  1. Visibility spec problem for single cell CellGroupData


    But if the group contains only one cell the {} visibility spec does not work:



    Notebook[{
    Cell @ CellGroupData[{ Cell["Group 1", "Chapter"] }, Open],
    Cell @ CellGroupData[{Cell["Group 2", "Chapter"]}, {}]
    },
    CellGrouping -> Manual
    ] // NotebookPut

    Add a second cell to the second group and it will disappear!









  1. Cell @ CellGroupData as a first cell in Cell @ CellGroupData


    When the first cell in a group contains another CellGroupData then the parent CellGroupData is confused.


    Not only {} will still show whole group but even giving specific {1} cell position fails.


    Notebook[{
    Cell @ CellGroupData[{ Cell["Group 1", "Chapter"] }, Open],
    Cell @ CellGroupData[
    { (*Cell["","Text"],*) (*uncomment this cell and everything is ok*)

    Cell @ CellGroupData[{
    Cell["Group 2", "Chapter"], Cell["Group 2", "Text"]
    }]
    , Cell["text", "Text"]
    }
    , {2}
    ]}
    , CellGrouping -> Manual
    ] // NotebookPut


    enter image description here








  1. Deletion of CellGroups in Editable -> False notebook


    You can delete each cell one by one, even those from the cell group. But if you try to delete after selecting group bracket you will get a beep and won't be able to delete it.


    CreateDocument[
    { Cell @ CellGroupData[{

    Cell["1", "Text"]
    , Cell["2", "Text"]
    }]
    , Cell["2", "Text"]
    }
    , CellGrouping -> Manual
    , Editable -> False
    ]

    Whatever editable means, this is at least inconsistent.







Further reading


related to cell structure



Questions


How to understand cell groups behavior? Seems detached from 'cells framework' for me. Not to mention a minimal documentation.


Classification of faced 'issues' will be appreciated.



Answer





[...] Thank you for consolidating all of the issues to a single StackExchange article. I have confirmed the behavior you are reporting in each of the four issues. I will add a link to this StackExchange article in the developers report I originally filed. [...]


[CASE:3918002]



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...