Skip to main content

performance tuning - Distance between two line segments in 3-space


I need to compute the distance between two line segments in a project. After googling, I found this algorithm and used it to implement a Mathematica version:


distSegToSeg[{p1_, p2_}, {q1_, q2_}] :=
Module[{small = 10^(-6), u, v, w,
a, b, c, d, e, D,
sc, sN, sD,
tc, tN, tD},

u = p2 - p1;
v = q2 - q1;
w = p1 - q1;
a = u.u;
b = u.v;
c = v.v;
d = u.w;
e = v.w;
D = a*c - b*b;
sD = D;

tD = D;
If[D < small,
sN = 0; sD = 1; tN = e; tD = c,
sN = b*e - c*d;
tN = (a*e - b*d);
If[sN < 0,
sN = 0.0; tN = e; tD = c,
If[sN > sD, sN = sD; tN = e + b; tD = c;]]];
If[tN < 0,
tN = 0;

If[-d < 0,
sN = 0,
If[-d > a,
sN = sD,
sN = -d; sD = a]],
If[tN > tD,
tN = tD;
If[-d + b < 0,
sN = 0,
If[-d + b > a,

sN = sD,
sN = -d + b; sD = a]]]];
sc = If[Norm[sN] < small, 0, sN/sD];
tc = If[Norm[tN] < small, 0, tN/tD];
N[Norm[w + sc*u - tc*v]]
]

The code is not in good Mathematica style, and it's very slow. Do you have any idea to make this faster? Do you have a better way to compute the distance between two line segments in 3D?



Answer



You can easily see that if the nearest approach of the two infinite lines does not fall within both segments then you must calculate the nearest distance of all four end points to the other segment.



 pointsegdis[{seg_, pointlist_}] := 
Module[{u = Subtract @@ seg, mean = Plus @@ seg/2},
{#, (mean - u Sign@# Min[1, Abs@#]/2) &@(-(2 ( # - mean).u )/u.u) } &
/@ pointlist ]
segsegdis[s1_, s2_] := Module[{u, v, w, d, t1, t2},
{u, v, w} = Subtract @@ # & /@ {Sequence @@ #, First /@ #} &@{s1, s2};
If[(d = u.u v.v - (v.u)^2) != 0 &&
Abs[t2 = 2 (u.u v.w - u.w v.u)/d + 1] <= 1 &&
Abs[t1 = 2 (v.u v.w - v.v u.w)/d + 1] <= 1,
Plus @@ (#[[1]] (1 + {1, -1} #[[2]] )) /2 & /@ {{s1, t1}, {s2, t2}} ,

First@SortBy[Flatten[pointsegdis /@ {{s1, s2}, {s2, s1}}, 1],
Total@((Subtract @@ #)^2) &]
] ] ;

{s1, s2} = RandomReal[{-1, 1}, {2, 2, 3}];
connect = segsegdis[s1, s2];
Graphics3D[{Line /@ {s1, s2}, {Red, Line[connect]}}]

enter image description here


This is several orders of magnitude faster than Minimise or FindMinimum



 testcases = RandomReal[{-1, 1}, {100, 2, 2, 3}];
(aa = Norm[ Subtract @@ segsegdis[#[[1]], #[[2]]] ] & /@ testcases) //Timing // First
(bb = First@
Minimize[{ Norm[(#[[1, 1]] (1 - t1)/2 + #[[1, 2]] (1 + t1)/2) -
(#[[2, 1]] (1 - t2)/2 + #[[2, 2]] (1 + t2)/2) ] ,
{-1<=t1 <= 1 , -1 <= t2 <= 1}}, {t1, t2}] & /@ testcases) // Timing //First
(cc = First@
FindMinimum[{
Norm[(#[[1, 1]] (1 - t1)/2 + #[[1, 2]] (1 + t1)/2) -
(#[[2, 1]] (1 - t2)/2 + #[[2, 2]] (1 + t2)/2) ] ,

{-1 <= t1 <= 1 , -1 <= t2 <= 1}}, {t1, t2}] & /@ testcases) // Timing // First


{0.015600, 12.620481, 2.714417}



verify all three give the same result to reasonable numerical precision


 Max[Abs[aa - bb]] -> 5.82532*10^-10
Max[Abs[aa - cc]] -> 2.25578*10^-6

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

plotting - How to draw some 2D curves in a 3D plot?

I want to plot several 2D curves ( Sin[x] at y=0 , Cos[x] at y=1 ) in a 3D plot, what function should i use? f[x_, y_] := Piecewise[{{0, y 0}, {Sin[x], y == 0}}] g[x_, y_] := Piecewise[{{0, y 1}, {Cos[x], y == 1}}] Plot3D[{f[x, y], g[x, y]}, {x, 0, 10}, {y, 0, 10}] doesn't work. Any ideas? Answer ParametricPlot3D[{{Sin[u], 0, u}, {Cos[u], 1, u}}, {u, 0, 20}, BoxRatios -> 1, PlotRange -> {{-2, 2}, {-.5, 2}, {0, 20}}] === update - general thoughts === I've seen the comments to this question and a few other approaches to the waterfall (or wire) plot are given in this question: Plotting several functions . Also I cannot not mention one of my favorite Mathematica blogs - Archery with this post on the story of discovery of 1st pulsar and an its infamous graphics - code is given in the post: