Skip to main content

graphics3d - Creating 3D dice


How to create an image of a 3D die from the 2D images?


enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here


enter image description hereenter image description here enter image description here


There is an example in the Documentation Center


enter image description here



I tried enter image description here


but it doesn't work.



Answer



By using a cube with rounded corners, from this answer, and by applying the images as "stickers" onto the sides of this cube, the dice can be made to look a little bit more realistic. The black border does not translate well to a 3D visualization, so I hid it by fiddling with the vertex coordinates.


faces = Import /@ {
    "http://i.stack.imgur.com/FdfMj.png",
    "http://i.stack.imgur.com/Qv7w6.png",
    "http://i.stack.imgur.com/WayOQ.png",
    "http://i.stack.imgur.com/mgjkA.png",
    "http://i.stack.imgur.com/qa5bK.png",

    "http://i.stack.imgur.com/T8szh.png"
    };

polygons = With[{eps = 0.01, k = 0.05}, {
    {{k, k, 0 - eps}, {k, 1 - k, 0 - eps}, {1 - k, 1 - k, 0 - eps}, {1 - k, k, 0 - eps}},
    {{k, 0 - eps, k}, {1 - k, 0 - eps, k}, {1 - k, 0 - eps, 1 - k}, {k, 0 - eps, 1 - k}},
    {{1 + eps, k, k}, {1 + eps, 1 - k, k}, {1 + eps, 1 - k, 1 - k}, {1 + eps, k, 1 - k}},
    {{1 - k, 1 + eps, k}, {k, 1 + eps, k}, {k, 1 + eps, 1}, {1 - k, 1 + eps, 1 - k}},
    {{0 - eps, 1 - k, k}, {0 - eps, k, k}, {0 - eps, k, 1 - k}, {0 - eps, 1 - k, 1 - k}},
    {{1 - k, k, 1 + eps}, {1 - k, 1 - k, 1 + eps}, {k, 1 - k, 1 + eps}, {k, k, 1 + eps}}

    }];

(* roundedCuboid: https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/49313/drawing-a-cuboid-with-rounded-corners *)
roundedCuboid[p0 : {x0_, y0_, z0_}, p1 : {x1_, y1_, z1_}, r_] := {
   EdgeForm[None],
   Cuboid[p0 + {0, r, r}, p1 - {0, r, r}],
   Cuboid[p0 + {r, 0, r}, p1 - {r, 0, r}],
   Cuboid[p0 + {r, r, 0}, p1 - {r, r, 0}],
   Table[Cylinder[{{x0 + r, y, z}, {x1 - r, y, z}}, r], {y, {y0 + r, y1 - r}}, {z, {z0 + r, z1 - r}}], 
   Table[Cylinder[{{x, y0 + r, z}, {x, y1 - r, z}}, r], {x, {x0 + r, x1 - r}}, {z, {z0 + r, z1 - r}}], 

   Table[Cylinder[{{x, y, z0 + r}, {x, y, z1 - r}}, r], {x, {x0 + r, x1 - r}}, {y, {y0 + r, y1 - r}}], 
   Table[Sphere[{x, y, z}, r], {x, {x0 + r, x1 - r}}, {y, {y0 + r, y1 - r}}, {z, {z0 + r, z1 - r}}]
   };

sticker[img_, coords_] := With[{eps = 0.92}, {
   EdgeForm[None],
   Texture[img],
   Polygon[coords, 
    VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{eps, eps}, {1 - eps, eps}, {1 - eps, 1 - eps}, {eps, 1 - eps}}]
   }]


Graphics3D[{
  White, roundedCuboid[{0, 0, 0}, {1, 1, 1}, 1/20],
  MapThread[sticker, {faces, polygons}]
  },
 Boxed -> False, Lighting -> "Neutral"
 ]

Mathematica graphics


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more