Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - How to represent a continuous monotonic phase of Airy functions?


Note: In this question I am concerned only with real-valued variables and functions.





DLMF, §9.8 Airy Functions, Modulus and Phase, formula $9.8.4$ defines the phase of Airy functions: $$\theta(x)=\arctan\frac{\operatorname{Ai}x}{\operatorname{Bi}x}.$$ The corresponding Mathematica definition is


θ[x_] := ArcTan[AiryAi[x]/AiryBi[x]] 

Apparently, in this form the phase has a countable infinite number of jump discontinuities for negative values of $x$. I need to construct a Mathematica expression that represents a continuous monotonic version of the phase $\theta(x)$ (let's name it $\vartheta$), where all pieces between discontinuities are properly shifted and stitched, as shown on the following graph: Phases


One approach would be to get the derivative of $\theta(x)$: $$\theta'(x)=-\frac1\pi\frac1{\operatorname{Ai}^2 x+\operatorname{Bi}^2 x},$$ so that all information about jumps is lost, and then consider the definite integral: $$\vartheta(x)=\frac1\pi\int_x^\infty\frac{dz}{\operatorname{Ai}^2 z+\operatorname{Bi}^2 z}.$$ Or, in Mathematica notation:


1/π Integrate[1/(AiryAi[z]^2 + AiryBi[z]^2), {z, x, ∞}]

Unfortunately, Mathematica leaves this integral unevaluated, even if an explicit value for the boundary $x$ is provided.




Is it possible to write a closed-form Mathematica expression, possibly containing special functions, that represents the continuous monotonic phase $\vartheta(x)$?




Answer



Short story


$$ \vartheta(x) = \arg \left[(\operatorname{Bi}x+i \operatorname{Ai}x)e^{-\frac{2}{3} i (-x)^{3/2}}\right]+\frac{2}{3} \operatorname{Re}\left[(-x)^{3/2}\right] $$


Update: I see that you want use only real functions, so you can expand this as


$$ \vartheta(x) = \begin{cases} \arctan\frac{\cos \left(\frac{2}{3} (-x)^{3/2}\right) \operatorname{Ai}x-\sin \left(\frac{2}{3} (-x)^{3/2}\right) \operatorname{Bi}x}{\sin \left(\frac{2}{3} (-x)^{3/2}\right) \operatorname{Ai}x+\cos \left(\frac{2}{3} (-x)^{3/2}\right) \operatorname{Bi}x}+\frac{2}{3} (-x)^{3/2} & x<0 \\ \arctan \frac{\text{Ai}(x)}{\text{Bi}(x)} & x\geq 0 \end{cases} $$


Update 2: You can replace $-x$ by $(|x|-x)/2$ to get rid of the piecewise.


Long story


$$ \theta(x) = \arctan\frac{\operatorname{Ai}x}{\operatorname{Bi}x} = \arg(\operatorname{Bi}x+i \operatorname{Ai}x) $$



In the complex plane


ParametricPlot[Through@{Re, Im}[I AiryAi[x] + AiryBi[x]], {x, -100, 0}, PlotRange -> All]

enter image description here


There are a lot of turns arond the point $(0,0)$.


We know asymptotics of $\operatorname{Ai}x$ and $\operatorname{Bi}x$ at $x\to -\infty$


$$ \mathrm{Ai}(x) \sim \frac{\sin \left(\frac23(-x)^{\frac{3}{2}}+\frac{\pi}{4} \right)}{\sqrt\pi\,(-x)^{\frac{1}{4}}}, \quad \mathrm{Bi}(x) \sim \frac{\cos \left(\frac23(-x)^{\frac{3}{2}}+\frac{\pi}{4} \right)}{\sqrt\pi\,(-x)^{\frac{1}{4}}} $$


Therefore, let us multiply $\operatorname{Bi}x+i \operatorname{Ai}x$ by $\exp(-\frac{2}{3} i (-x)^{3/2})$


ParametricPlot[
Through@{Re, Im}[(I AiryAi[x] + AiryBi[x]) Exp[-I 2/3 (-x)^(3/2)]], {x, -100, 0},

PlotRange -> All]

enter image description here


Less then one turn!


After this we need to add the phase


$$ \arg \exp\left[\frac{2}{3} i (-x)^{3/2}\right] = \frac{2}{3} \operatorname{Re}\left[(-x)^{3/2}\right] $$


Finally,


θ[x_] := ArcTan[AiryAi[x]/AiryBi[x]]

phase[x_] := Arg[(I AiryAi[x] + AiryBi[x]) Exp[-I 2/3 (-x)^(3/2)]] + Re[2/3 (-x)^(3/2)]


Plot[{θ[x], phase[x]}, {x, -5, 5}, PlotRange -> All]

enter image description here


Real version of phase:


phaseRe[x_] := 
Piecewise[{{ArcTan[
AiryBi[x] Cos[2/3 (-x)^(3/2)] + AiryAi[x] Sin[2/3 (-x)^(3/2)],
AiryAi[x] Cos[2/3 (-x)^(3/2)] - AiryBi[x] Sin[2/3 (-x)^(3/2)]] + 2/3 (-x)^(3/2),
x < 0}, {ArcTan[AiryBi[x] , AiryAi[x]], x >= 0}}]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.